Military Action Begins..
Thursday, March 20, 2003 by Frogboy | Discussion: WinCustomize News
Reply #2 Thursday, March 20, 2003 7:04 PM
Reply #3 Thursday, March 20, 2003 7:11 PM
Reply #4 Thursday, March 20, 2003 7:15 PM
Reply #5 Thursday, March 20, 2003 7:42 PM
thank you for expressing those sentiments. I happen to believe that this military action is wrong at this point in time. However, we must think of the troops and all who are being affected and pray for them daily
Reply #8 Thursday, March 20, 2003 9:18 PM
Here is a very interesting article to read.
Sunday March 16, 2003
The Observer - United Kingdom.
Deep roots of Bush's hatred for Saddam
The determination in Washington to confront Saddam goes back more than a decade. The men who are now President Bush's key advisers have long advocated regime change in Iraq. This is how their beliefs became the driving force behind the administration
Twelve years ago, in the aftermath of the first Gulf war, the two men who would become the key players in driving the US towards a second war against Iraq sat down to collect their thoughts. They were Dick Cheney, now Vice-President of the United States, and Paul Wolfowitz, presently Deputy Secretary for Defence.
What they wrote would form the basis of US policy today.
For the full story:
http://www.observer.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12239,914925,00.html

Reply #9 Thursday, March 20, 2003 9:53 PM
Reply #10 Thursday, March 20, 2003 11:59 PM

Reply #11 Friday, March 21, 2003 1:16 AM
Reply #12 Friday, March 21, 2003 5:35 AM

Why attacking iraq ?
-> There is an hundred other countries with dictators , a lot as more armed and more dangerous that sadam who was being disarmed by UN !
-> USA has just 10 years oil stock
-> 90% of the administration have worked into big oil corporation such as Enron (the Hawks)
-> Iraq is the second biggest oil stock after... Saudi Arabia
-> SO why by so urged to do war ?
-> With all the money spend to do this -> why we don't put 1000 inspectors or more and continue in a way where Sadam was destructing his own arms !
-> Why not letting them 6 months more, with all the inspectors and satellite which watching them, Iraq can do nothing (and all the american & british army) !
-> 75% of the people (and states) of the world, 50% of the americans are against, USA discredit them and don't listen just a word or an idea of them.
I'm so angry and sad... It's a shame for USA & UK !
You will say i'am an anti-american, no I'm totaly anti-bush-administration, anti-TonyBlair
-> Turc parliament is not for sale, even if it is 26 billions $
-> It was the biggest demonstrations in London since World War II, but Blair discredit it...
-> Colin Powell lie to UN council by presenting false proof (satellite photo). Like in the Gulf War when USA present false photo to Saudi Arabia to unload the army on their territory.
Reply #13 Friday, March 21, 2003 5:36 AM
Sylvio
Reply #16 Friday, March 21, 2003 11:00 AM
Reply #17 Friday, March 21, 2003 12:09 PM
After Gulf war, the was embargo, i don't comment it...
Then there was the food oil exchange.
Then some company were implented in Iraq, Sadam doesn't want US company, it is right, i can understand him because US was in war against him.
I'm totaly aigainst dictators like Sadam.
But, because US has no interest in Iraq, because USA has only 10 years of oil stock, because Iraq has 100 years stock at least... There is a war.
Before Irak attack kuwait in 90's, US army was in gulf some month ago. They do the war to protect their interest in Kuwait.
Since some months US army was in gulf... I know their will be a war since some month...
They don't want a pacific way, they want to control Iraq just to install oil company in a "country of liberty" (= without Sadam) which permit them to do it.
UN & many countries know that. And then they say "No, we don't want this war", we don't want the control of USA over the world policies just for oil. Iraqi men were killed in 90's.
Then 50% of Iraqi have less than 15 years old !
Sadam gives all people over ~12 years old guns and put them on the front... Who will US army killed ? Sadam or this children ?
Today we know some american and british soldier were killed ? Then I supposed that some of these Iraqi were killed too. But no people know how many are being killed at this time in the desert.
American doesn't know a lot about it, because patriots american just listen Bush saying "trust me, i will protect you against the demon and blablabla... god bless america (and go bless the others ?)".
Bush is an Hawk... Bush just want oil... Bush say he will protect america... Bush attack Iraq... Bush will install a American governement for 6 month in Iraq (and why not a UN governement ??)... American oil corporation will come back in Irak...
Arab people hate more and more america, they are not stupid, they know what want america. They are fed up to be killed, to have war, to be poor, for their oil...
Terrorism is an easy way... sadam is not bin laden... but bin laden is still here. Bush know the risk, but he prefer oil. It is the way, he protect you. And a big part of american don't see that. And it is dangerous for Europe too, we are close from middle-east.
I don't attack america, I'm with american who prefer Iraqi than oil,
i'm with arab people too.
I hate Bush, Blair, Sadam, Sharon and Poutine.
Reply #18 Friday, March 21, 2003 12:13 PM
http://www.bretzelforbush.com
Reply #19 Friday, March 21, 2003 12:24 PM
already there in force. That way there wouldn't have been any oil fields on fire that would take months, and possibly lives, to put
out and have been enviornmental nightmares.
Here are some links to the reasons we are in Iraq right now.
Iraq's tortured children - BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/from_our_own_correspondent/2058253.stm
See men shredded, then say you don't back war - Times
Online http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3284-614607,00.html
The Iraqi connection (to 9/11) - UK Guardian http://www.observer.co.uk/focus/story/0,6903,591439,00.html
IRAQ Systematic torture of political prisoners - Amnesty International http://web.amnesty.org/ai.nsf/print/MDE140082001?OpenDocument
UK Govt dossier decribes torture, rape and killing in Iraq - The New Zealand Herald http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3007499&thesection=news&thesubsection=world
Reply #20 Friday, March 21, 2003 2:04 PM
I think the Bush administration is right and i hope the threat of Saddam is removed with as few innocent lives lost as possible.
In regard to the french They rejected any final resolution even before saddam did. Who are the French to dictate or lecture about foriegn policy The British and American forces saved thier deriares in ww2.
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!








Reply #1 Thursday, March 20, 2003 7:03 PM