Snipers in DC
Tuesday, October 15, 2002 by ToeJo | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
I live 45 minutes outside of DC. This sniper stuff really ticks me off. I've never seen anything like this. Anyone think it's al-Qaida? I don't know, but I hope they catch the SOB soon!
 |
|
Page 8 of 10 | |
|
|---|
Aqua.
Reply #142 Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:16 PM
Reply #142 Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:16 PM
Ballistics tests have confirmed it. The sniper has been caught!
Aqua.
Reply #143 Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:33 PM
Reply #143 Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:33 PM
Who wants to bet that Maryland will drop their moratorium on executions specifically for this pair?
Aqua.
Reply #145 Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:30 PM
Reply #145 Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:30 PM
What's your cup of tea? Hanging, firing squad, burning at the stake....
Peff
Reply #146 Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:32 PM
Reply #146 Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:32 PM
Stoning, I think...It seems only fair for those who would target children for money.
Jafo
Reply #147 Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:54 PM
Reply #147 Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:54 PM
Neutering with a rusty razor blade...
Or....
We have the odd hungry croc or two in the NT...seems there was a shortage of American tourists...they had to dine on German instead.
Or....
Glory sakes....how 'bout 'shooting' them.
Call it poetic justice.
Just don't tell them where or when, and do it long-range....
Or....
We have the odd hungry croc or two in the NT...seems there was a shortage of American tourists...they had to dine on German instead.
Or....
Glory sakes....how 'bout 'shooting' them.
Call it poetic justice.
Just don't tell them where or when, and do it long-range....
Aqua.
Reply #149 Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:34 PM
Reply #149 Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:34 PM
Of course, we could always draw & quarter them, I seem to recall from history books that was practiced for much less serious crimes.
goodmorphing
Reply #150 Friday, October 25, 2002 2:19 AM
I had been wondering why there was so much police protection at their arraignments.... I think I know now.
Which book was it that had them rehabilitating criminals, until they really loved life and society and had a full and promising future ahead of them... and then they shot them (reasoning that taking something of no value from someone is missing the point somehow)? 1984?
um.... bakerstreet? I admit, I am not too sure of your reference to Everquest or Norrath -- but for sure I know about the rest of it. I'm just hoping you are doing OK. In my book, you're one of the good guys.
goodmorphing would hate to think that these creeps are OK (and probably enjoying their notoriety) and someone who cares about stuff is not!
this spelling is brought to you by iespell.... 
Reply #150 Friday, October 25, 2002 2:19 AM
I had been wondering why there was so much police protection at their arraignments.... I think I know now.Which book was it that had them rehabilitating criminals, until they really loved life and society and had a full and promising future ahead of them... and then they shot them (reasoning that taking something of no value from someone is missing the point somehow)? 1984?
um.... bakerstreet? I admit, I am not too sure of your reference to Everquest or Norrath -- but for sure I know about the rest of it. I'm just hoping you are doing OK. In my book, you're one of the good guys.
goodmorphing would hate to think that these creeps are OK (and probably enjoying their notoriety) and someone who cares about stuff is not!
this spelling is brought to you by iespell.... 
wombat_1
Reply #151 Friday, October 25, 2002 2:21 AM
Reply #151 Friday, October 25, 2002 2:21 AM
What happened to 'innocent until proved guilty'?????
Bloody lynch mob mentality as usual.
Bloody lynch mob mentality as usual.
joetheblow
Reply #152 Friday, October 25, 2002 5:32 AM
Reply #152 Friday, October 25, 2002 5:32 AM
I have to admit it would seem that this guy did it. Everything is matching up. (Unless somebody really screwed up the ballistics). I can't fatham why he would do it. He does not seem crazy at all, he looks like a jerk though. Even the 17 year old looks ok. Even in the bad new story photo he does not look like the other mass murderers.
It just seems really strange to me. To many things do not add up. You take a kid to shot people? I want to hear the words from his mouth. I need him to say something.
And your right wombat_1, it is innocent until proven guilty. I want to know what is going on with this whole story. It doesn't make sense.
I get the money part though... they needed to get away, and live high off the money.
It just seems really strange to me. To many things do not add up. You take a kid to shot people? I want to hear the words from his mouth. I need him to say something.
And your right wombat_1, it is innocent until proven guilty. I want to know what is going on with this whole story. It doesn't make sense.
I get the money part though... they needed to get away, and live high off the money.
Aqua.
Reply #155 Friday, October 25, 2002 11:36 AM
Reply #155 Friday, October 25, 2002 11:36 AM
wombat, I think that the ballistics and his own admission proves his guilt.
Bangkokboy
Reply #156 Friday, October 25, 2002 11:50 AM
Reply #156 Friday, October 25, 2002 11:50 AM
They don't prove his guilt , until it's been properly sorted in court.
BTAIM, if we were innocent until proven guilty, then you would never feel a policeman's handcuffs on your wrist until after you had been tried and convicted by a court. And we all know that's not true.
BTAIM, if we were innocent until proven guilty, then you would never feel a policeman's handcuffs on your wrist until after you had been tried and convicted by a court. And we all know that's not true.
joetheblow
Reply #158 Friday, October 25, 2002 6:52 PM
Reply #158 Friday, October 25, 2002 6:52 PM
I think that addmission stuff doesn't mean he is guilty. It just means he said he is. Even now the Central Park Joger case where I believe 4 or 5 young boys said they were guilty... but now it looks like somebody else did it.
So it is still innocent until proven guilty. I personally think he looks very guilty indeed, but I am not a jury. It would seem that they caught him. No shootings since. Everything seems to be ok now.
This still seems so strange to me. Why did he do it? And take a young child along for the ride? Why keep killing? Then why give the police the info to catch you?
It would seem they have thier man. And if they have the evidence, the jury will convict.
So it is still innocent until proven guilty. I personally think he looks very guilty indeed, but I am not a jury. It would seem that they caught him. No shootings since. Everything seems to be ok now.
This still seems so strange to me. Why did he do it? And take a young child along for the ride? Why keep killing? Then why give the police the info to catch you?
It would seem they have thier man. And if they have the evidence, the jury will convict.
Peff
Reply #159 Friday, October 25, 2002 7:29 PM
Reply #159 Friday, October 25, 2002 7:29 PM
Joetheblow....I'm sorry, but that's bull! Juriies are made up of people like you and me...so you ARE the jury. The american justice system is flawed to say the least. When a killer(s) can be aquited on a technicality (even though all evidence points to their guilt...just watch Law and Order sometime) something is not right. If he said he did it, then I believe he did (even without taking into account the ballistics evidence, the setup in the car for firing from the trunk, etc...).
The central park jogger case is a different matter altogether. The 5 'boys' gave confessions under extreme duress....which they later recanted. Although I agree a jury trial is a necessity, I think that in this case it is a waste of taxpayer money. The evidence and confession should speak for itself and the sick bastard should be executed in public. I dare say that your attitude would be different if the victims had been your loved ones (heaven forbid).
The central park jogger case is a different matter altogether. The 5 'boys' gave confessions under extreme duress....which they later recanted. Although I agree a jury trial is a necessity, I think that in this case it is a waste of taxpayer money. The evidence and confession should speak for itself and the sick bastard should be executed in public. I dare say that your attitude would be different if the victims had been your loved ones (heaven forbid).
wombat_1
Reply #160 Friday, October 25, 2002 8:53 PM
Reply #160 Friday, October 25, 2002 8:53 PM
Law and Order???
Why not the Simpsons or maybe Dallas??
A bloody TV series (good or not) is fine basis for another 'expert opinion' of the Legal System!
If the system is flawed this would be one good example.
JHCoaC!!!!!
Why not the Simpsons or maybe Dallas??
A bloody TV series (good or not) is fine basis for another 'expert opinion' of the Legal System!
If the system is flawed this would be one good example.
JHCoaC!!!!!
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
|
|
Page 8 of 10 | |
|
|---|
Reply #141 Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:57 PM