Shell Replacement

goodby explorere.exe

Friday, December 16, 2005 by Kevison | Discussion: Community

Has anyone done a review on replacement shells? I was wondering if there was a better shell other than the explorer.exe found with XP.
Gregory2001
Reply #1 Friday, December 16, 2005 1:39 PM
Litestep.
thomassen
Reply #2 Friday, December 16, 2005 2:03 PM
AstonShell ... many many more.

go to www.shellcity.org and you'll find a huge list.
Kevison
Reply #3 Friday, December 16, 2005 2:58 PM
go to www.shellcity.org



great! thanks for the response!
William / Quist
Reply #4 Friday, December 16, 2005 7:24 PM
I'll go even one step further.....if you have tried other shell replacements, which one would you recomend and why?

Posted via WinCustomize Browser/Stardock Central
Jafo
Reply #5 Friday, December 16, 2005 7:28 PM
Litestep, because it's the oldest and most enduring...and the sky's the limit when it comes to adaptability.  It was originally a shell for Win 95 ....because 98 hadn't even been released then...
tjesterb
Reply #6 Friday, December 16, 2005 8:50 PM
Jafo likes Litestep?

Whoda' thought it?

Seriously, I agree w/Jafo here. LS probably has the best track record, and you're more likely to find documentation and support for it than newer shells.

(Jafo, do you get conflicts with Object Dock under LS?)
thomassen
Reply #7 Friday, December 16, 2005 8:54 PM
Yup Litestep is very solid. But I think Aston is as well. Thought that isn't free, mind you. However I tried it a couple of years ago and I found it very interesting. However I was more compelled by DX and Objectbar even though they aren't really shells.

I know I have tried quite a few others, but I'm poor with names and that was two three years ago. I suppose I'll remember if I dropped by shellcity again and had a look.
Kevison
Reply #8 Tuesday, December 20, 2005 7:16 AM
my question is how stable are these replacements? I have (sometimes still do) use BB4WIN and it works relatively well.
thomassen
Reply #9 Tuesday, December 20, 2005 12:46 PM
The thing is I never used these shell replacements for long. But Litestep should be one of the most stable ones.
scorpio-logic
Reply #10 Tuesday, December 20, 2005 12:59 PM
The stability of the two shell-replacements you are talking about is up to the authors. I'd go with litestep. With it you can do just about everything you'd want, if you know what you want. Works well.
Der-Rickster00001
Reply #11 Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:51 AM
My Question is how compatable are these shells with the various components of Object Desktop?...Could some plz elaborate...thx...
Kevison
Reply #12 Wednesday, December 21, 2005 12:36 PM
My Question is how compatable are these shells with the various components of Object Desktop?


I would think they would be compatible enough. As I understand shells, it still has to operate under the constratints of a windows environment(OS) so.. wb should work. I remember playing with WB and BB4WIN and it seem to work.
CerebroJD
Reply #13 Wednesday, December 21, 2005 2:23 PM
DesktopX.
Kevison
Reply #14 Friday, December 23, 2005 8:03 AM
I think a nice shell replacement would be one that read my mind then did what I really wanted it to do... or was I thinking of my wife.. darn!

Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

  • Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
  • Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
  • Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
  • It's simple, and FREE!



web-wc01