Ratings are a JOKE!
Monday, January 26, 2004 by PoulanZ | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
This rating system is so corrupt. I submitted an Icon(Adobe CS) 1/21/04 an recieved the infamous "6" then sign in today and notice that it's been downgraded to a "4", 5 days later. PLEASE!! What a joke. The system is pathetic here and everyone knows it. Get rid of the "Ratings" and let the members decide on their own whether they like it or not. Until I see a change, I refuse to submit any of my hard work and time to this caos.
Reply #62 Tuesday, January 27, 2004 3:51 PM
spring cleaning anyone?
[Message Edited]
Reply #63 Tuesday, January 27, 2004 3:53 PM

Reply #64 Tuesday, January 27, 2004 4:09 PM

Reply #65 Tuesday, January 27, 2004 4:30 PM
Chas...one problem is that each time a skin is updated it attracts more attention and therefore usually more ratings....now if the skin was originally OK and had a '8'...then you made it brilliantly perfect but someone was not overly thrilled and gave it a '4' then though it had 'improved' as a skin the rating would now be a '6'.
It happens....and can be annoying, but generally the more times a skin is rated the more 'accurate' the median becomes...
Reply #66 Tuesday, January 27, 2004 4:31 PM
Chas...one problem is that each time a skin is updated it attracts more attention and therefore usually more ratings....now if the skin was originally OK and had a '8'...then you made it brilliantly perfect but someone was not overly thrilled and gave it a '4' then though it had 'improved' as a skin the rating would now be a '6'.
It happens....and can be annoying, but generally the more times a skin is rated the more 'accurate' the median becomes...
Reply #70 Tuesday, January 27, 2004 4:47 PM
and I won't light myself on fire. I have done that before and it was not very entertaining...at least to me.
Reply #71 Tuesday, January 27, 2004 4:51 PM
i am going to make a bootskin about you travis, can i?
Reply #72 Tuesday, January 27, 2004 7:37 PM
| I do my homework before I open my mouth and risk making myself look like a fool. I'm not directing anything at you, trying to flame you, and or otherwise trying to just be an [explitive deleted]. |
That was a personal attack Horizon..Blah
Not submitting to this site, or withdrawing work from this site doesn't make me a lesser artist, nor does it make me a fool or an explitive deleted.
And it is not "fine arts" what I do.
What I wanted to point out is that constructive criticism together with a low mark is a far better way than giving low ratings only.
Read my earlier posts in this thread please.
[Message Edited]
Reply #73 Tuesday, January 27, 2004 7:40 PM
**sigh**
Reply #74 Tuesday, January 27, 2004 7:46 PM
Jacob....when people may not know you they are likely to seek info such as checking submitted works, etc and will likely jump to [incorrect] conclusions.
It's difficult maintaining an online personna that remains consistent to all so that assumptions are not jumped-to...
BTW....'expletive', not 'explicitly'....

Reply #75 Tuesday, January 27, 2004 7:53 PM
It's "Edit Thread", it's "Edit Thread"...
And I stand corrected: "expletive"
[Message Edited]
Reply #76 Wednesday, January 28, 2004 2:06 AM
When I said "I do my homework before I open my mouth and risk making myself look like a fool." It means exactly that, "I" means "I", I doesn't mean you, nor does it refer to "you", you is not a synonym of I, contains none of the same letters, is pronounced differently, and has a very different meaning. "I" didn't say anything about "you" being less of an artist than "you" stated. Nor did "I" call "you" a fool, or an [expletive deleted]. Please note that the word "I" is being used in that sentence, not "you."
Your constructive critism is a good idea, but how many people here can really give out useful critiques instead of just comments.
Most of the people here do not understand the difference between "what they like" and "what works"
[Message Edited]
[Message Edited]
Reply #77 Wednesday, January 28, 2004 2:20 AM

Reply #78 Wednesday, January 28, 2004 3:37 PM
wow, im dizzy.
i also think that when a person rates, they should be required to put a comment (that is appropriate) along with the rating...

Reply #79 Wednesday, January 28, 2004 4:06 PM
ratings are meant to be anonymous, no? at least to everybody but the people in charge. unless you feel that you need to comment on the skin, I really see no reason to force and comment with a rating. If anything that would discourage ratings, something there is already to few of.Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!







Reply #61 Tuesday, January 27, 2004 3:45 PM
Styl-X Design will now shut up, knowing he is demanding an expensive thing; time