ObjectDock VS YZDock

Tuesday, January 6, 2004 by EvilCartman | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk

topic
First Previous Page 2 of 2 Next Last
connor_roberts
Reply #21 Thursday, April 15, 2004 2:21 AM
well I also have a 415mb library of all my OSX copyrighted icons so I know how to make Aqua Dock look 10 times better than OD, but like i said, use whatever you want. I prefer the performace and functionality and look of AD over OD since for OD requires you to download stuff to use on it, instead of just using existing icons and rendering them nicely
PixelPirate
Reply #22 Thursday, April 15, 2004 2:40 AM
Why don't you get a Mac when you seem to think it's so much better? This is a customization site, we like to customize our PC's including the dock - so why spend time making it look like another system? OD is perfect as an alternate quick launch.
AndreasV
Reply #23 Thursday, April 15, 2004 5:35 AM
Aqua Dock is a shameless rip off of Y'zDock with modified resources. So, basically it's Y'zDock and Y'zDock may no longer be distributed. Object Dock is still alive (and is much smoother on my machine when doing animations than Y'zD.).

And btw, Y'zDock does use GDI and GDI+ instead of DirectX. MobyDock is the one that is using DirectX.
[Message Edited]
Apocalypse_67
Reply #24 Thursday, April 15, 2004 6:47 AM
i was just trying to be nice and give you guys a better program that what you all have.


Thank you Mr Connor. Thank you, thank you, thank you so much for taking the blind fold off of our eyes and guiding us to the light.

Please dude, just about everyone here knows of the existance of other programs. Most have try or are using other program instead of OD. So dont come here posting about how your oppinion and your "programing" knowledge are more validated .
Sput
Reply #25 Thursday, April 15, 2004 9:13 AM
connor_roberts -

Object dock is jumpy and grainy when changing magnifications. I hate Object dock


Have you thought of checking your video drivers, since I've been using OD for a good while (on and off) on 2 machines. On one, its as smooth as silk because the video card and drivers are up to the job, on the other, the pathetic old video card and drivers make it jumpy and look poor. I wouldn't blame OD for that though as that machine just isn't happy with it.

I've read your other comments on the other threads, and all you're "claims" to be an expert, but when the experiences of others disagrees with your wild assertions, maybe it's time for you to re-assess the strength of your evidence and accept that (as with a lot of software) milage varies depending on your requirements and platform.

Personnaly, if I want an Aqua-ish launch and task bar, then OD works for me....I'm not looking for it to be look or behave exactly like Apple's, and being skinnable and relatively configurable, OD meets my requirements. On suitable hardware/software it runs like a charm, I've never had crashes caused by it, it's hosted (written?) by a company I've come to respect through using their other software, and it's free. Seems like a winner all round in my book.

Of course, if your particular set up works better with something else, that's entirely up to you - that's the joy of skinning isn't it, to be able to decide how things look and work on your own set up?
Orion
Reply #26 Thursday, April 15, 2004 9:36 AM
Where's the task bar? It's (AquaDock) useless (to me) with out it.
c242
Reply #27 Thursday, April 15, 2004 9:39 AM
connor_roberts : As already stated : AquaDock IS Y'ZDock blatantly ripped (if not really stolen). Get Your facts right before promoting any software and talking crap like this. I have had all 3 docks on my system and ObjectDock was the one to stay. Now You can guess why ?
[Message Edited]
Lotherius
Reply #28 Thursday, April 15, 2004 6:29 PM
Regardless of what's better, what's stolen or not, I don't think anyone has the right to hold ObjectDock's bugginess or lack thereof against StarDock (although it would be nice if that update I keep seeing would not fail every time!).

Fact: Stardock gives ObjectDock away for FREE and does not offer official support for it. They can leave it is buggy as they want, it doesn't matter - you didn't pay for it. If, on the other hand, it's ObjectBar's bugs you want to complaina bout - that's different. They expect money for that.



Powered by SkinBrowser!
SelfExiled
Reply #29 Thursday, April 15, 2004 9:12 PM
Yawn, I'm getting sleepy with this topic. But, when is the next version of ObjectDock coming out. Please, less memory usage and fix the leaks. Thank you.
Frogboy
Reply #30 Thursday, April 15, 2004 10:11 PM

Me thinks he's never changed the ObjectDock settings. There are various quality settings in it.

I'm not sure why he thinks we should sweat it. Oh no, he's dissing one freeware program over another.

Apocalypse_67
Reply #31 Thursday, April 15, 2004 10:32 PM
Not only dissing but also promoting a ripped program
yrag
Reply #32 Thursday, April 15, 2004 11:06 PM
It's probably just me, but every now and then I enjoy a little moronic entertainment..



Powered by SkinBrowser!
eieio
Reply #33 Thursday, April 15, 2004 11:13 PM
Well, maybe a little late to contribute to the topic ... what a novel idea
but I installed Object Dock right after getting here. Haven't taken it off since. Put it on my machine at work. Great program and does what I need it to.

Ironically, I downloaded Y'z Dock right before it .. ah .. disappeared, but somehow never got around to installing it.
SelfExiled
Reply #34 Friday, April 16, 2004 12:31 AM
I really like Object Dock myself. I just wish that I could use it more. I would like it to be a permanent addition to my desktop. But, it uses too much memory. Sure, there are better settings that slightly improve the memory usage, but at the loss of visual quality. Maybe if it used more of the DirectX drawing methods, and less of the GUI drawing methods, it would probably be better.

Also, it tends to continue to use memory, until you have none. And it locks up sometimes or lags terribly. This is especially true with all the great additions available to it. Such as the Weather Object. Come on everyone, sure Obj. Dock is good, but it has quite a way to go.

It is just like the BootScreen. They are both great programs, don't misunderstand me. But, they are still in the development stages. The problem is that when they are both fully developed, I doubt if they will still be freeware.
[Message Edited]
SelfExiled
Reply #35 Friday, April 16, 2004 12:35 AM
Also, I would never use YZ Dock. I'm stuck/struck with Stardock Programs. I'll just wait for the next version of Object Dock and hope it gets better.
moshi
Reply #36 Friday, April 16, 2004 9:32 AM
so you prefer a program that has a memory leak and would never use one that does not? that´s .... erm ... kinda hard to understand.
paxx
Reply #37 Friday, April 16, 2004 11:23 AM

I have no memory leak problem with Object Dock, then again, I don't use the weather docklet. I think the leak comes from the Weather object, not the dock program itself. I could be wrong though.

Object Dock runs without much problems for the need I have. And I can't think of a dock being of any use without a taskbar. It's a must have.  Only one bug I have: the apps in the taskbar sometime won't restore when clicked, I have to Alt-Tab to bring them back. But that's relatively minor and it doesn't happen very often.

Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

  • Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
  • Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
  • Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
  • It's simple, and FREE!



web-wc01