1024 & 1280. Who uses more?

Wednesday, November 19, 2003 by Stupendous Man | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk

In looking at DX Themes I have noticed that *most* themes are for reso's of 1280+ and the authors generally say that the only ones using 1024 are people with 15" monitors or laptops.

So, my question is: Of the people using DX Themes, which is the greater number, 1024 or 1280? Has there already been a poll done on this and what was the result. If not, could that be considered for a future poll.

Sign me 'Just Curious'
First Previous Page 2 of 3 Next Last
Orion
Reply #21 Wednesday, November 19, 2003 8:24 PM
At work I use 2560x1024. At home it's 1280x1024.
sig101
Reply #22 Wednesday, November 19, 2003 8:26 PM
I've had 19" and 17" monitors and I'ved use 1024x768 for years. This was not the default resolution for my monitors (the defaults settings were 800x600 even on my newest---one year old---monitor, go figure) but it's a comfortable size for me.
Phoon
Reply #23 Wednesday, November 19, 2003 8:31 PM
Here is some statics on Screen Resolutions from our WinCustomize Logs:1: 1024 x 768 (53%)2: 1280 x 1024 (18%)3: 800 x 600 (13%)4: 1152 x 864 (7%)5: Other (unspecified) (9%)


Based on my DX themes, the 1280x1024 themes have been vastly more poplular. On one particular theme, I made 2 identical versions. One of them is 1024 and the other is 1280. The 1280 got a higher rating and holds double the amount of downloads as the 1024.

It took me a bit to get used to 1280 on my 19" monitor, but now that I am used to it, 1024 looks gigantic and is uncomfortable.

Now an example of a flip side...
DaWebMassa's Warehouse theme... the higher res theme donned a 10 rating while the 1024 counterpart earned a 9. However in the download stats, the 1024 has had slightly better results.

Make your own judgement call, but I'd say go at it in 1280x1024 if you are comfortable viewing it yourself.

kona0197
Reply #24 Wednesday, November 19, 2003 11:28 PM
why do you guys like the higher resulutions? If i use 1024 x 768 I have to squint to read the screen.
Cavanaugh
Reply #25 Wednesday, November 19, 2003 11:39 PM
umm 2 21" monitors at 1600x1200



Powered by SkinBrowser!
Raithe
Reply #26 Thursday, November 20, 2003 1:57 AM
Oh Jafo, not Mitsubishi! I cringe when I hear Mitsubishi, but thats another story, you don't find the 1024x768 too over exagerated on that 19"?

Who said anything about being bigger for the sake of it - I am sure that you didn't buy that 19" because it came standard with your computer?

When I purchased my 19" it was with one thing in mind - more viewing area! In fact, over the past year I have come to see that purchasing ever growing monitors sizes is futile! Its become my personal belief that power-users should in fact relie on dual monitors to increase work efficiency but then again I have always been a little crazy when computers are concerned!
gef
Reply #27 Thursday, November 20, 2003 2:17 AM
17" monitor - 1280x1024. Perfect for me.
horiz0n
Reply #28 Thursday, November 20, 2003 2:17 AM
I use 1280x1024 on my desktop LCD, 1600x1200 on my dell laptop, and 1600x1024 on my apple powerbook, (widescreen)
digital_k
Reply #29 Thursday, November 20, 2003 2:59 AM
1024/768 here also.
Flamedog
Reply #30 Thursday, November 20, 2003 3:36 AM
I use 1600x1200 and I love it. At work I use 1280x1024 because it doesn't support any higher.
Styl-X Design
Reply #31 Thursday, November 20, 2003 3:42 AM
I use 1280, when working on a design or a website I hate low resolutions.
Jafo
Reply #32 Thursday, November 20, 2003 6:03 AM
Raithe...I upped to the 19" because it can be pushed to 1600x1200 at 75 hz....[or 1280x1024 at 85hz]....so when setting multi-res LiteSTEP themes I can actually finally test the 1600 without killing a monitor...
Stumpy
Reply #33 Thursday, November 20, 2003 6:26 AM
Wow! - You mean there is a higher resolution than 640x480



Powered by SkinBrowser!
Venomized
Reply #34 Thursday, November 20, 2003 8:38 AM
I use 1600x1200 @ 85 hertz on my 19" Dynaflat...It's ok for me
B1uesummers
Reply #35 Thursday, November 20, 2003 11:10 AM
1024 is too big while 1280 is too small. I use the inbetween 1152 on my 19" monitor. A big reason why my friends don't use 1152 is because they don't have that resolution option.
kona0197
Reply #36 Thursday, November 20, 2003 11:24 AM
I will say it again - why do you people insist on using such big res? The bigger the res, the smaller things get. I find it hard to read anything on my screen at 1024 so I like 800x600.
gef
Reply #37 Thursday, November 20, 2003 12:33 PM
17" monitor at 1280x1024 - perfect for me.
gef
Reply #38 Thursday, November 20, 2003 12:36 PM
17" monitor at 1280x1024 - perfect for me.
Aleatoric
Reply #39 Thursday, November 20, 2003 12:40 PM
Kona,

The things may be smaller (even though there's room for some changes in font size and the like), but I can read everything quite nicely at 1600x1200. I can also get a lot more on a give page (document or web page, etc.).

People have different comfort levels with visual abilities, so what works best for you is cool

I know people who have 640x480 on a 21" monitor. I can read text on that screen from 20 feet away
Raithe
Reply #40 Thursday, November 20, 2003 2:25 PM
Jafo,

That was my point - the average joe will just purchase the standard size monitor that comes with a computer but an artist or power-user has a need and will purchase as much as he or she can to be more productive.

Kona,

Listen to Aleatoric, perhaps he says it the best.

Damn it always seems that when I say something its never quite clear enough! Chalk it up to my own stupidity, I guess

Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

  • Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
  • Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
  • Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
  • It's simple, and FREE!



web-wc01