US is going to war tomarrow... dang...
Sunday, March 16, 2003 by IPlural | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
Reply #1462 Tuesday, April 8, 2003 3:39 AM
Vegetarianism has a number of sources, one being religious (for instance in Buddhism one tries to disconnect oneself from the world by living sober) or social ("oh, those poor piggies"). But as long as man is still born with four teeth used for tearing meat, this crae will continue to eat it.
But the trouble with these things is, what you may find best for people, may not be what they feel. So what to do then? Force them to adopt your principles? Or convince them somehow (which could be a slow process)?
Reply #1463 Tuesday, April 8, 2003 5:47 AM
NEAR NAJAF, Iraq (AFP) - A facility near Baghdad that a US officer had said might finally be "smoking gun" evidence of Iraqi chemical weapons production turned out to contain pesticide, not sarin gas as feared. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20030407/wl_mideast_afp/iraq_war_wmd_030407175243
Alberto Fujimori´s CountryXXX was Peru btw.
Reply #1464 Tuesday, April 8, 2003 5:49 AM
criminally minded countries"
I agree with you!, Heck why stop at the middle east? Lets just blow up the whole planet!!
Then for sure, we'll have peace,
Reply #1465 Tuesday, April 8, 2003 6:13 AM
Fujimori, one very odd dude that one!
Nice "WMD" post BTW!
Strange pre-occupation this thing with Sarin and 'Mustard Gas', Sarin is WW2 chemistry and Mustard Gas dates back to 1915.
paxx, done and dusted. Might be the only way we'll get some sleep!

Reply #1466 Tuesday, April 8, 2003 6:47 AM
Reply #1469 Tuesday, April 8, 2003 7:02 AM
Report: U.S. Finds Missiles with Chemical Weapons
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A47645-2003Apr7.html
Reply #1470 Tuesday, April 8, 2003 7:04 AM
Reply #1471 Tuesday, April 8, 2003 7:08 AM
I see the post makes you sign up
ok
the article goes like this:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. forces near Baghdad found a weapons cache of around 20 medium-range missiles equipped with potent chemical weapons, the U.S. news station National Public Radio reported on Monday.
NPR, which attributed the report to a top official with the 1st Marine Division, said the rockets, BM-21 missiles, were equipped with sarin and mustard gas and were "ready to fire." It quoted the source as saying new U.S. intelligence data showed the chemicals were "not just trace elements."
It said the cache was discovered by Marines with the 101st Airborne Division, which was following up behind the Army after it seized Baghdad's international airport.
Reply #1473 Tuesday, April 8, 2003 7:15 AM
A tyranical governement for his own people, sure, but not a threat for any other country it seems.
Xerraire, I'm waiting to see that news confirmed in other news site. So far, nothing.
Reply #1474 Tuesday, April 8, 2003 7:20 AM
I don't think so
The link that moshi had I think is an entire different article, and indeed are drums full of pesticide.
Reply #1475 Tuesday, April 8, 2003 7:22 AM
Reply #1476 Tuesday, April 8, 2003 7:28 AM
I looked for other sources in "print" for that article.
I don't blame you for wanting much confirmation. Its a good way to be, on that we can agree.
I found a few:
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/abs_news_flash_article.asp?FlashOID=7858
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=395118
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/news/040703_NW_toxicfind.html
Reply #1477 Tuesday, April 8, 2003 7:38 AM
btw: i´m a threat to world peace as well. chlorine is pretty easy to create with the chemicals at the university lab

Reply #1478 Tuesday, April 8, 2003 7:39 AM
Reply #1479 Tuesday, April 8, 2003 7:45 AM
my desk is hazzard to the world as well then.
At an arms reach, I have nail polish remover (makes my eyes water every time), scissors, and a rather vicious looking letter opener shaped like a Toledo Sword.
You, we, make light, but the fact that Saddam used chemicals on his own people isn't funny. Nor that he tortured and killed them either.
I am not saying that is our entirely our responsibility, But I do ask then, if not us, then who?
I like peace, but if innocents are dying, what is the asnwer then?
Reply #1480 Tuesday, April 8, 2003 7:52 AM
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!








Reply #1461 Tuesday, April 8, 2003 1:38 AM
Africa is a golden example of what happens when part of the world evolves past a primitive practice (colonialism) and simply leaves. The same could be said for Southeast Asia. As crea says, in order for 'Peace and Coexistence' to prevail there, it would have to be imposed. We are too evolved for that, so our ex-colonies are... better for it?
Nah. Peace and Coexistence, once again, are the products of care, not carelessness. The UN wants to rebuild Iraq after we are done, will we get blamed when they wander off, like they have everywhere else? Damned if ya do, damned if ya let someone else do... We are taken to task for ongoing troubles in Afghanistan, and yet a stronger hand would be the dreaded 'nation building'.
**
I got into an argument with a vegetarian once. I can comprehend the need to avoid meat for health reasons (though I doubt the soundness of the practice). This person, though, was totally against meat as a food source because it required killing an animal. I wondered out loud whether lions would be better off if they did so too, and the vegetarian wholeheartedly agreed with the idea. Not only was it morally wrong for us to eat animals, it was morally wrong for the lion too. The lion just wasn't 'evolved' enough to notice. That concept is so foreign to me that it is really beyond comprehension.
Where do ideals like this come from? At what point are we bettered by finding the normal working order of nature distasteful? Maybe natural processes evolve to unrecognizable equivalents, but I am troubled by any need to cast them off completely before their time, whether it be war or my rare steak...