We've been had again!
Remember the bailout?
Thursday, November 6, 2008 by kenwas | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
For those following the great $700B bailout plan, it would appear that we have been had again. First, Paulson was going to buy "toxic assets from the banks. That was changed to a plan to give loans to the banks with oversite and strings attached. None of that happened. What did happen was the government simply bought non-voting shares of stock in the banks and the banks are free to do with the cash whatever they wish. There are no strings attached, not even a requirement to begin lending again. Ergo, Fannie Mae will be using part of the funds to retain defense attorneys for the very executives that created the problem in the first place. Not only are we giving them these funds without strings or oversite, we are now paying the defense fees of the executives. It would appear that we have been had again.
Reply #2 Thursday, November 6, 2008 5:40 PM
They have bought and are buying the stock. They are non-voting shares and no legal way that I know of to track the funds and control the use. The defense fund for Fannie Mae was on the radio today. I forget which station.
Reply #5 Thursday, November 6, 2008 5:57 PM
Like I said I heard it on the radio not sure what station. I heard it again on a Fox News bit with Judge Napolitano. Whether it is true I have no way of knowing but it was not posed as a dem or rebublican blame issue but rather a legal issue. I would be truly happy to hear that it is not true however!
Reply #6 Thursday, November 6, 2008 5:59 PM
Hope you are including both parties in this. ![]()
Reply #7 Thursday, November 6, 2008 6:24 PM
Reply #8 Thursday, November 6, 2008 6:28 PM
And we will contunie to be had because we are all on the FAILBOAT! ![]()
Reply #9 Thursday, November 6, 2008 6:29 PM
a bit of cut and paste
Meanwhile, the Washington Post reports major US banks are on pace to spend more than half their bailout money on rewarding their shareholders. The thirty-three banks are set to receive some $163 billion in government bailouts. Half of that sum would go toward paying off shareholders over the next three years. The Bush administration touted the bank bailout as necessary to resume lending. But Treasury officials say the banks would never accepted loans if they weren’t allowed to redistribute dividends to shareholders. Democratic Senator Charles Schumer of New York is calling for the suspension of dividend payments at bailed-out banks.
Reply #10 Thursday, November 6, 2008 7:31 PM
I think there's got to be a way to stop this. I really can't believe this. This is causus belli if true.
Not to detract from the thread but Detroit automakers are asking for money too.
Reply #11 Thursday, November 6, 2008 7:40 PM
That's why I keep my money in Canadian banks...that and the fact that I'm Canadian. ![]()
Mind you I'm looking at buying shares instead of putting money in the bank as 8% in dividend returns beat's a 4% bank account.
Reply #12 Thursday, November 6, 2008 7:54 PM
The whole situation was bad to begin with.
Mind you. we are counting here on the media to be reporting facts here, which at times does get us into trouble.
If this is true though, just how much do these people think the tax paying working stiffs (yes, that would be the rest us) are willing to put up with?
How's that saying go 'Fool me once shame on me, fool me twice...........'
Reply #13 Thursday, November 6, 2008 10:21 PM
Sure was.... and I predicted this precise scenario! There was no way those greedy bastards were going to do the right thing with the bailout money... it was always going to go on themselves before fixing up the mess the pricks made in the first place.
It should have gone out as mortgage relief so that struggling home buyers could make their repayments to the banks and keep their homes... but no, that's socialism and NOT the American way.
What Crap... the rich stay rich/get richer, and richer... and the average joe gets screwed again...and again... and again... and when will somebody say "fuck the big banks, let 'em go under and let's start again"
Reply #14 Friday, November 7, 2008 12:01 AM
I wish I had lot's of mony because I'd by a lot of the foreclosed home's at a third of the price. Then turn around and sell it back to the original owner at that rate plus costs and say 5% then hold the initial mortgage. People would actually have a mortgage they could pay. Actually surprised that no body has jumped on that.
Reply #15 Friday, November 7, 2008 12:37 AM
Jeez. When it rushed though, I knew it was bad.
This is a mistake from both parties.
Reply #16 Friday, November 7, 2008 3:15 AM
Why so?. It is the same people doing the oversite!
Reply #18 Friday, November 7, 2008 5:52 AM
Sure did....
Sure was.... and I predicted this precise scenario!
Again, the relief/aid/rescue package is going to the wrong people... not those who desperately need it.
![]()
Reply #19 Friday, November 7, 2008 6:45 AM
Business as usual Starkers. And I agree....I'd love to see Wall street crash and burn. Wouldn't effect me one bit. I'm so poor now I can't even see bottom to reach up to anyway.
Again...Business as usual Starkers. Oh...and yes...I did see that coming...I was just kidding. ![]()
Reply #20 Friday, November 7, 2008 7:01 AM
What Crap... the rich stay rich/get richer, and richer... and the average joe gets screwed again...and again... and again... and when will somebody say "fuck the big banks, let 'em go under and let's start again"
Business as usual Starkers. And I agree....I'd love to see Wall street crash and burn. Wouldn't effect me one bit. I'm so poor now I can't even see bottom to reach up to anyway.
Again, the relief/aid/rescue package is going to the wrong people... not those who desperately need it.
Again...Business as usual Starkers. Oh...and yes...I did see that coming...I was just kidding.
It wasn't just starkers...but let's start a protest movement. I'm on the phone to my representative like SOONEST!
I'm just gonna ask her one question: "You wanna keep your job?"
Believe me....and the media as well CNN MSNBC...the works! No whining! Action needed! Please get on the horn!
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!








Reply #1 Thursday, November 6, 2008 5:25 PM
Ken, this is horrendous if true. I know that the idiots can't do anything right, but this wrong? Is it irreversible or can things be rectified? As I understood it, a commission type agency was to be set up to keep oversight.
I find it hard to believe that the same lack of oversight which contributed to this mess is still at work (or still not at work).
This is a real shocker. I had read that the money would be phased in fairly slowly, and that one or two bodies would be overssing it. Have you heard different?