Dumping old stuff
old windowblind stuff
Saturday, May 19, 2007 by mschleisner | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
Reply #2 Saturday, May 19, 2007 1:49 PM
There are 4,075 WB skins here right now.
You are listed as a current customer, which gives you, for the Stardock apps you have purchased, free unlimited downloads without having to subscribe to WC.
Reply #3 Saturday, May 19, 2007 6:24 PM
Reply #4 Saturday, May 19, 2007 6:33 PM
Reply #5 Saturday, May 19, 2007 7:20 PM
I've taken several of my older skins down including a couple of Windowblinds. For me it was a matter of quality. My first few attempts just weren't up to par.
Having said that, a LOT of the older stuff just doesn't fit that category. When they were posted they were "State of the Art"
For those who like to track downloads, pulling off a Windowblind can really effect their total.
Reply #6 Saturday, May 19, 2007 7:57 PM

Reply #7 Saturday, May 19, 2007 11:49 PM
As for older skins, I think they're better off being updated and added as new entries, keeping the older ones for posterity and history.
Reply #8 Sunday, May 20, 2007 12:00 AM
You said it for me. Oldies but goodies. Some of them are irreplaceable. Unique. Still work on WB 5.5 I like going back to when I first found this community and running some themes just to remember what was really eye-catching and innovative way back when. Resort, rearrange, etc. No dumping.
Reply #9 Sunday, May 20, 2007 12:08 AM
mschleisner seems there's about 3700 you haven't tried yet by your numbers. Stardock more than likely won't be taking down old skins anytime soon as content is the catalyst around which the site revolves. New WB's are submitted almost daily..stay on page 1 and you'll never have to stress on older work.
Reply #10 Sunday, May 20, 2007 12:01 PM
Reply #11 Sunday, May 20, 2007 12:12 PM
This may be true but there are still people out there using older Windows OSes, some still using 95. The numbers are maybe not that large for them but the older skins are needed by these users.
Reply #12 Sunday, May 20, 2007 12:48 PM
Reply #13 Sunday, May 20, 2007 1:26 PM
And that is by choice, as the name implies CursorXP is for XP only, WindowBlinds is not.
Yes there are many talented people here but to make a complete with all the bells and whistles WB can take 40 to 80 hours.
Reply #14 Sunday, May 20, 2007 4:13 PM
at the VERY least.. some.. months.
Reply #15 Sunday, May 20, 2007 5:36 PM
I could rant on but why bother...this person wouldnt understand.
Reply #16 Sunday, May 20, 2007 6:56 PM
I remember old days of skinning when features consisted of titlebar and frame, borders, buttons, radio and check buttons. Those was so easy. Ah old days...
Reply #17 Sunday, May 20, 2007 7:26 PM
Reply #18 Sunday, May 20, 2007 7:31 PM
Reply #19 Sunday, May 20, 2007 9:11 PM
I have several wb that are old. But they still work well on XP. One of my favorite skinners from the past is starone. She was definately a skinner a head of her time. She has a unique style and wonderful talent that cannot be denied. As well as other from the past.
Reply #20 Tuesday, May 22, 2007 7:09 AM
There are a # of golden oldies that I use as well....on XP...And remember that to new people they are not *old...had a WB made in 2001 on my machine, friend saw it & loved it & couldn't believe how it *old it was
It is a pleasure to be able to stroll through those old skins....any kind & see the original ideas & styles that were being used. I use many old skins from a variety of programs....
agreed
It's My Secret
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!







Reply #1 Saturday, May 19, 2007 1:34 PM
Instead of dumping it, why not just ignore it?