Extra cost to develop and supprt a custom solution that is unlikely to bring in revenue  . .  I can't see that happening.  Not a bad idea though.  I like seeing new ideas.

I don't see this conversation as elitism (unless its by the screenshotters).  It's about putting forth good quality work that supports the sponsor of the site's goals.

Of course you wouldn't!

People are coming in here with formulated opinions and saying what they want.

I'm speaking from hard cold facts, dates, times and places, yet you question my replys and not the others who are presenting bald-headed lies.

Why is that?

You can't twist this, not with me.

Curtis . . that's not elitism.  That's a response to the  flood of back-patting submissions  There is a difference.

I do not believe that any of the admins or moderators are anti-screenshot . .  but I, for one, get irritated by what I see as misuse.  While I don't blame any clique for the decline of the screenshot gallery, where the same clique could have improved the situation they chose not to.

See my list above of what should make a featured shot (reply #77).  Posting a shot of something unique or new makes good sense.  Posting a desktop that is functional because of Stardock products makes sense.

Zubaz, I have been doing a Classic Hot Rod series of screenshots to show off I.R.Braniac's Slider blind. Here's an example of one.
[WWW Link
Is this along the lines of what you mean. Would Vista gadgets be the same as SD apps?
I have been posting 1 or 2 a day and was going to end after I had posted 10

Call it what you want, but I call it encouragement Aaron, and that's a difference

It seems to me that it's hard to pick a daily screen shot to showcase the SD apps from the plethora of screen shots, when the majority are either sloppy looking,don't match, show few applications, or just dont showcase skinning well as a whole.

Please before any body gets disgruntled let me explain. The featured shot is a SS that needs to embody the best skinning has to offer, it has to jump off the page and say to the viewer "DAM you need this!!!" Why ? because it is not just seen here, it is featured on many of the SD family sites Including the SD main home page. So it has to represent our community and SD in the best possible light it can..I see no problem with this as,you always lead with your best foot. Looking at the SS section many would not fit the criteria Zubaz posted. Like wallpapers, the SSOTD must be heavily moderated to keep the standards high..

If your SS gets Featured, its not just a deal... it is the hugest deal and the highest honor a Non skinner can get, as it was chosen as the best of the best,and deemed worthy of representing WC as well as Stardock corporation to the World. Flooding the SSOTD with mediocre screens, just to keep it a daily occurance, would detract from the massive honor being featured is meant to be.

I know I my self have at times been puzzled with the Amount of some peoples uploads within a weeks time..some had upped 5-6 in a week..."for those who are doing that or have in the past" did you really only use it 1 day and get bored?.. did you really take the time to perfect it? (my A Tribute SS took 5 years from start to finish to complete).This one took 3 mo's of work to get it where it is. Generation
not to mention the custom ports and mods I Built my self in most of my SS.

Im not trying to showboat, but trying to convey that theres more be being a true Screen shotter than just slapping them out like burgers at a restaurant. Quality over quantity.

I realize that some are just having fun and not intentionally flooding the SS library. I say good for you.Have fun. But with that, it is getting harder to sort through the SS section to find that one of a kind SS to be featured as best of the best....so don't be getting on the mods for not having it change daily.

"Carguy"... your series is attempting to showcase a skin set and not just willy nilly uploading, IMO this does not fall in to the category of what I/the others have been talking about..

The SSOTD has been moved to a higher level of status it takes the best of the best, to get featured .. with this new status .. We need to step up to meet the challenge offered to us..

This administrator believes screenshots of Windows customization in action a valuable tool and pivotal to the skinning game/industry.

There IS no better way to 'champion the cause' of skinning.

The Wincustomize 'Screenshot of the Day' was never ever actually seen to be literal as it almost never altered on a daily basis.  Maybe 'Featured Screenshot' really WOULD address the issue of the frequency of change.

Zubaz's list of prerequisites is spot on.  The actual intent of this featured shot is to provide a 'recent' working example of Stardock's/Wincustomize's GUI modification in action ..... something that would/will appeal and attract the novice.

For a very long time there have been one or three uploaders who tended to FLOOD the section with 50 permutations at a time with maybe nothing more than the wallpaper changing.....hardly inspirational.

I must dash....it's Xmas day here...more to follow...

Me too - just got back from celebrating bringing in xmas day, gallon of beer etc...

At last, someone actually suggests a solution.

No need - this is the kind of input being sought. Having thought about it, I support your suggestion. We can still feature screenshots without either ratings or downloads. Though as Zubaz says, it may not be cost effective.

More input please!

That's the second time you've said that. Sorry mate, but this is not your forum... It belongs to everyone. Just like the screenshot gallery is not your gallery (that is how you are coming across).

You need to have a rethink. Are you willing to address the issue at hand, or are you going to continue concentrating on your own perceived issues? This isn't about you. It's not about an 'us and them' (there is no us and them, just a community with a common interest in desktop customization), it's about finding practical solutions to real problems.

At the end of the day, if you want more screenshots featured, then upload screenshots which showcase customization. It's a simple equation, but one which most appear to be failing at the basic level.

 

More tomorrow when I've recovered from a long night.

Actually it's the fourth time, but whos counting?

This bald headed lie right here made it us against them my friend and I just didn't ignore it. It's funny how well things are taken out of context though. But no, I'm not going to let you or nobody else just walk in here and lie like that, not on me and not on my friends. So sorry to you too partner.

There are several misconceptions in here, yet my words are the ones getting yanked on.

I've been addressing this since April and here we are in December, this is not a personal agenda, it doesn't twirl my beenie Sir!

I asked a simple question and all hell break loose, like "how dare you ask". So pardon me if I speak my mind like everyone else in here is doing.

Curtis . . still not proposing anything you can do.
Not commenting on HG's suggestions or Jafo's feedback.  No mention of my list of "featured" criteria.

No one is trying to twist, lie, or attack you or your friends.  I think you're reading what you want into this. (But then . . you'd expect me to say that, right?  )

Bringing up the perceived issue is great . . trying to find a solution is even better. 

• CarGuy1 . . I wouldn't' say that Vista sidebar gadgets qualify.  They are not SD Products.  I think core is WB, icons, and dock or DX gadget.  Less than that would have to be extra-ordinary.
• Leo, I like your idea of limiting the number of screenshot submissions.  Two a month per member seems reasonable.

All the proposed suggestions are good ideas and worthy of some thought by the higher ups for possible implementation.

Heh . . take a look at that

 

looks great.. I.R. and them did a killer job...

Now that ain't your every day plain old desktop. Excellent job I.R.   

Ah, yes....real life [tm]  gets in the way.....had to dash to pick up my mother to take to my sister's [first Xmas without my father] ....definitely more important than the frequency of a screenshot change...

I often wonder exactly how much of a thread and its content people bother to read before adding comment themselves.  So often salient points are seemingly ignored as they're never later mentioned/referenced.

There was a time in the past where the 'screenshot of the day' was fairly frequently changed [not daily].  If you investigate the meaning/intent of the phrase 'of the day' it does NOT mean it must be of only that ONE day and thus MUST be new each day.

Later the 'sotd' has been changed less frequently still as the single proviso of its choice is that it MUST promote Stardock's skinning aps in particular...being both attractive and explanatory, and not just 'some new upload by whomever'.

It has always been a thorny point that a few of the specifically 'only screenshot' uploaders have blessed the site with copious quantity and little quality, so much so that more often than not the truly WORTHY shots are lost in the flood.  Very few 'outsiders' even understand what the uploader of such a flood even gets out of doing so.  Moderators typically see it as just 'more crap to deal with' rather than their being in the front row of the 'wow look at this new stuff - show'.

My first real involvement with screenshots and their making/displaying was to do with skinners' "works in progress", or queries like "HTF do you fix this image bug?" - tools of a skinner's trade.  Or creating screens depicting what a new [LS] shell theme looked like...so if people downloaded it and installed....hopefully they'd emulate it.

When non-skinners [but users] upload the screenshots they can easily be 'wow...look at that lot as a collection [suite] ...great choice' ....but that's well and good if there's one ver....but less than good when 20 variations are uploaded as if no-one 'got it' the first time.  That simply dilutes the 'innovative'...

Re 'Rat Pack' ....it'd be a close call as to whether that term was first coined on 'the other side of the moderation fence' or by the 'Rat Pack' members themselves....

There was a collective 'bunch' who gravitated towards screenshotting who appeared to be oblivious to the idea that 'less is more' and appeared to want to dominate the gallery through 'flooding' it.  This isn't something that NEEDS to be legislated against....but rather something that could preferably be 'grown out of'. 

There are actual screen-capture proggies out there in the wild that can auto-capture the desktop at any time interval....[as long as you have harddrive space].  Flood the gallery with those and we'd really 'need to talk'. ....

 

Like Wom's idea of renaming it to Featured Screenshot........to be updated at Moderators discretion

Like the idea of limiting the number of screenshots to three per month per member........

I would leave the 'ratings' in as it adds interest and allows people to participate.......monitor any alleged abuse and deal with it accordingly........

Do away with with download numbers as it does not really mean anything......

Cp, or anyone else for that matter......How do you feel about this? Is there anything you would like to suggest or see implimented.........

We have some good suggestions so far. Changing the name to Featured Screenshot works well and could be implemented easily. Doing away with ratings and download counts is excellent - but would mean a site coding change and isn't really on. Limiting the numbers of uploads would also work and maybe get people to have a serious think about what they were uploading - but how could this be implemented?

Another suggestion would be to put all but the best screenshots to Personal Pages only. What do people think of that?

Oops

I, for one, think posting the guidelines is a great idea.

Informal poll: How many people knew of these guidelines?

I'm betting not many ... I know I don't recall ever seeing them posted anywhere.


I'd also bet that the more info that is posted about what 'should' go into submissions (and not necessarily limited to screenshots; some of the other gallerys could possibly use a little guidance); the less "irritating" submissions the mods would see ... and consequently a higher caliber of shots would be available to pick from for the 'chosen shot'.