Some of us could all go to Jail soon...
N/A
Monday, January 9, 2006 by Baby Face Nelson | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
What's up with this crap...
 |
|
Page 1 of 3 | |
|
|---|
47songs
Reply #2 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:14 PM
Reply #2 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:14 PM
"Some could go to jail, but if only some go to jail then all cannot"
There's nothing fuzzy about that logic!
There's nothing fuzzy about that logic!
aimzzz
Reply #3 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:18 PM
Reply #3 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:18 PM
Pretty annoying-- what's did you say your real name is? 
Sleeping Dragon
Reply #4 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:18 PM
Reply #4 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:18 PM
...all of us could some go to jail soon. ...all of us could some jo to gail soon. ...some of us could all. ...all of us could all... ...some of us could some jo to gail. hmmm
sleep is what I need.
sleep is what I need.
Bichur
Reply #6 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:24 PM
Reply #6 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:24 PM
whatha?
this is the 2nd post I've seen about this
y'all are directing this at me, aincha?
I'll be watching you.....
this is the 2nd post I've seen about this
y'all are directing this at me, aincha?
I'll be watching you.....
Sembetu
Reply #7 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:45 PM
Reply #7 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:45 PM
If I choose to annoy someone on-line in a publicly accessible forum, and I choose to withold my personal information when I do so, I will not hide in fear.
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constituion provides me protection from this kind of tyranny:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
1. I have the right to freely express my thoughts and expressions, including in an on-line forum, blog or newsgroup etc., and the onus is only upon the owner of the avenue of delivery to require any nature of disclosure.
2. I have the right to protect my identity, particularly from the government, if I did not, the Government's desire to have access to Public Library records arbitrarily would have been upheld. I can choose to be anonymous to protect my freedom from tyranny.
3. This is also clearly covered by freedom of the press. Since when do I have to disclose that I am the author of a book, for instance, that flames a given administration? I don't. I can simply author it under a pen name as Anonymous, or even better, a fake name, if I so choose.
This is really ridiulous, and I am waiting for the first government official to come busting down my door for annoying you with this rant.
Sembetu
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constituion provides me protection from this kind of tyranny:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
1. I have the right to freely express my thoughts and expressions, including in an on-line forum, blog or newsgroup etc., and the onus is only upon the owner of the avenue of delivery to require any nature of disclosure.
2. I have the right to protect my identity, particularly from the government, if I did not, the Government's desire to have access to Public Library records arbitrarily would have been upheld. I can choose to be anonymous to protect my freedom from tyranny.
3. This is also clearly covered by freedom of the press. Since when do I have to disclose that I am the author of a book, for instance, that flames a given administration? I don't. I can simply author it under a pen name as Anonymous, or even better, a fake name, if I so choose.
This is really ridiulous, and I am waiting for the first government official to come busting down my door for annoying you with this rant.
Sembetu
Fuzzy Logic
Reply #8 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:48 PM
Reply #8 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:48 PM
Most of us aren't in the US so will be ignoring it anyway. I plan to be just as annoying as ever...
TYCUS
Reply #9 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:52 PM
hehe..., some persecution delirium?
Reply #9 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:52 PM
| I'll be watching you..... |
hehe..., some persecution delirium?
47songs
Reply #10 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:52 PM
I'm looking forward to it.
Beth
Reply #10 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:52 PM
| I plan to be just as annoying as ever |
I'm looking forward to it.
Beth
47songs
Reply #11 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:52 PM
I'm looking forward to it.
Beth
Reply #11 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:52 PM
| I plan to be just as annoying as ever |
I'm looking forward to it.
Beth
Morpheous416
Reply #12 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:52 PM
Reply #12 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:52 PM
This would be used for actual threats against an individual, or possible threats to harm someone else...not for simple annoyances.
TYCUS
Reply #13 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:56 PM
i have to agree with you..., if Bush keeps this law, then where is goin to be the "This is a free country", words?
Reply #13 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:56 PM
| The First Amendment to the U.S. Constituion provides me protection from this kind of tyranny |
i have to agree with you..., if Bush keeps this law, then where is goin to be the "This is a free country", words?
aimzzz
Reply #14 Monday, January 9, 2006 2:01 PM
Not as written-- whatever the intent, it will be thrown out somewhere in the appeals process because it's too vague
Reply #14 Monday, January 9, 2006 2:01 PM
| This would be used for actual threats against an individual, or possible threats to harm someone else...not for simple annoyances. |
Not as written-- whatever the intent, it will be thrown out somewhere in the appeals process because it's too vague
WebGizmos
Reply #15 Monday, January 9, 2006 2:11 PM
Reply #15 Monday, January 9, 2006 2:11 PM
These kind of frivolous laws really "Annoy" me, it "threatens" my freedom of expression and will cause great "harm" to my way of expression. I think the perpetrators of this law need to be jailed! Immediately!
Sleeping Dragon
Reply #16 Monday, January 9, 2006 2:27 PM
Reply #16 Monday, January 9, 2006 2:27 PM
I don't know. There is a little bit to be said for accountability. Of course, I don't want anyone to know my true name, but it would be nice to know others. I could put ads in the newspapers selling their car for $100 and not tell them. Their phone would ring off the hook. Or sign up for 500 magazine subscriptions in their name.
ahhhhhhh memories.
ahhhhhhh memories.
gooberbean28
Reply #18 Monday, January 9, 2006 2:51 PM
Reply #18 Monday, January 9, 2006 2:51 PM
So thats where my car went! SD sold it,it WAS only worth a $100! Could you send me at least $50 of it?
Sleeping Dragon
Reply #19 Monday, January 9, 2006 3:16 PM
Sorry, I had to spend it on a bunch of Viagra someone bought in my name and I still owe on.
Reply #19 Monday, January 9, 2006 3:16 PM
| Could you send me at least $50 of it? |
Sorry, I had to spend it on a bunch of Viagra someone bought in my name and I still owe on.
WebGizmos
Reply #20 Monday, January 9, 2006 4:03 PM
Reply #20 Monday, January 9, 2006 4:03 PM
So SD...how IS that Viagra working out for you? Hey! It wasn't me! Really it wasn't!
Hey! It wasn't me! Really it wasn't! Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
|
|
Page 1 of 3 | |
|
|---|
Reply #1 Monday, January 9, 2006 1:00 PM
Some could go to jail, but if only some go to jail then all cannot