Misc Icons Versus Objectdock Versus IconPackager
Better moderation and guidelines needed
Friday, September 30, 2005 by WebGizmos | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
I'm curious as to why the "Objectdock" library is being flooded with submissions from the "Misc Icons" library that clearly are not "Misc Icons?" Shouldn't these be two different libraries? They are both starting to look the same lately. And doesn't "Misc" mean just that...misc...as in the odd icon? It seems that whole Icon packages are either broken down, or not packaged and submitted as "Misc Icons" instead of them being packaged and submitted as a package to the "Iconpackager" library, which if you look through the library of "Objectdock" you can see there is nothing "Misc" or odd about many of these icons...since they could easily make up a whole package. It's as if I'm watching Mormegils icon tutorial all over again.
 |
|
Page 8 of 8 | |
|
|---|
WebGizmos
Reply #142 Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:24 PM
Ok then...we'll wait and see.
Reply #142 Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:24 PM
| The test for this will be the DreamScenes stuff |
Ok then...we'll wait and see.
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
|
|
Page 8 of 8 | |
|
|---|
Reply #141 Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:01 PM
The test for this will be the DreamScenes stuff (dream.wincustomize.com) to see how people like it, what we can learn from it, and make it applicable for ObjectDock, DesktopX, etc.