Why Was Longhorn 5203 Removed?

Tuesday, July 26, 2005 by Sventekoz | Discussion: WindowBlinds

Does anyone know why this skin has been removed from the site? Is there a problem with it we should know about?
First Previous Page 3 of 4 Next Last
dj_cityboy
Reply #41 Friday, July 29, 2005 11:13 PM
Well thats pretty crapper for those of you that didnt get it.......sorry but it is wicked! Kol did a wicked job....i tried to find it the other night on the site and i couldnt find it for the life of me.....
crappy part is i still cant get the "Glow" min/max/close buttons i have Windowblinds 4.5...but as far as glows go i got nuthin?? any guesses would be nice!

cityboy
Quarkmachine
Reply #42 Friday, July 29, 2005 11:32 PM
It's still up at DeviantArt, just downloaded it myself. If it's so good MS has to throw a hissy about it, then I figured I should grab it!
_TAPPER_
Reply #43 Saturday, July 30, 2005 12:24 AM
Yeah, how dare they protect their own copyrights!


Well said! If they can't ask for copwrighted material to be removed no one else should be able to either. Consider this the next time someone modifies one your own skins and uploads it. Maybe it should not be removed either.
artweasloh
Reply #44 Saturday, July 30, 2005 3:38 AM
ohh. would they also request mine to be removed? ohhhh.... im kinda unnerved. really. i have my fingers crossed. i hope they won't. i will die if they will
artweasloh
Reply #45 Saturday, July 30, 2005 3:40 AM
-----double post: edited-----------
wait. there is one thing more. i wasn't able to download kol's LH5203 . so, if anyone is generous enough, please email me. plsplspls.... i am dying to have it thanks in advance... Email
PurrBall
Reply #46 Saturday, July 30, 2005 6:08 AM
cityboy, you have to have the latest windowblinds 4.59 beta on sdc to have glowies.
artweasloh
Reply #47 Sunday, July 31, 2005 4:40 AM
Thanks to JF for the email.

oh in case you don't know yet, WC removed the skin but Deviantart did not. hmmm. just discovered that today...
zdnet333
Reply #48 Sunday, July 31, 2005 5:00 AM
Fuzzy Logic
Reply #49 Sunday, July 31, 2005 5:09 AM
Unfortunately DA is now being run by a bunch of kids in jackboots. I doubt if they care about copyright
artweasloh
Reply #50 Sunday, July 31, 2005 6:28 AM
Unfortunately DA is now being run by a bunch of kids in jackboots. I doubt if they care about copyright


oh. i forgot about that little info. no wonder LH5203 was not removed(just a speculation. might not be the real reason ).
PurrBall
Reply #51 Sunday, July 31, 2005 6:59 AM
Jafo
Reply #52 Sunday, July 31, 2005 7:24 AM

It won't have been removed from Devart as yet because the administration there are too busy removing each other instead.

It'd be poetic justice if Microsoft lawyered-up on them unbeknownst and bit them in their corporate bum....

Sventekoz
Reply #53 Sunday, July 31, 2005 7:51 AM
So, the two IT pariahs of the moment slugging it out! Where can we find a ringside seat?
Lotherius
Reply #54 Sunday, July 31, 2005 9:42 AM
What's MS going to do when the new Windowblinds comes out supporting Vista-like transparenscies? If they're this paranoid about the Vista look getting out into the public pre-launch, then they probably won't like the next WB release at all.
werewolf
Reply #55 Sunday, July 31, 2005 10:03 AM
Stardock is a 'Certified Gold Partner' or 'Gold Certified Partner' (whatever) with MS, so, once the OS goes gold, I doubt there will be any problems.
Frogboy
Reply #56 Sunday, July 31, 2005 4:53 PM

I have restored the skin.  While I agree that Microsoft has every right to request the removal of the skin, they do not have the right to selectively enforce that right.  That is, they can't simply ask us to remove it but not request the other sites to do so as well.  I had informed Microsoft we would not agree with selective enforcement again.  It's been nearly a week and they still have done nothing.  The skin is available in countless forms (including .msstyles) on various websites.  And while Kol's is the closest to the Windows Vista look and feel, there are countless other similar skins that have been available for motnh.

If they are serious in their concern over skins inspired by the Windows Vista look & feel remaining off the net, we'll be happy to oblige them.  But we're not going to be the only skin site that doesn't have it simply because we're friends with Microsoft and thus are more familiar with what's happening on WC.

During the "Whistler" beta in May of 2001, we were working on a version of WindowBlinds then called WindowBlinds XP.  During that beta, we had figured out how to get WindowBlinds to apply .msstyles WITHOUT having to patch any DLLs. It was a clean "native" way of doing it (ironcially, the person at Stardock who figured this out now works at Microsoft but that's another story).  Microsoft requested that we take this ability OUT of WindowBlinds because they did not want third-party msstyles due to support and branding concerns at the time.  We complied with Microsoft's wish.  4 months later, Style XP was released by a new company called TGT Soft.  Not only did Microsoft not do anything to try to stop them, but they allowed TGT Soft to falsely claim that Microsoft supported what they were doing.  Only months later, on a web post, did a Microsoft spokesperson -- on deviantART, state that they did not want to see third-party .msstyles but it was too little too late.

To make a long story short, Stardock, which owns this site, is not going to suffer through selective enforcement again.  We abided by Microsoft's wishes during the Windows XP beta and the result has been 3 years of hacked uxthemes, msstyles advocates falsely claiming WindowBlinds is "bloated" (even though it's essentially identical in implementation to uxtheme except with more features and HW acceleration) and of course TGT Soft.

TexasJoe
Reply #57 Sunday, July 31, 2005 5:25 PM
Yeah! Stop messing with Stardock!
Sventekoz
Reply #58 Sunday, July 31, 2005 6:35 PM
Without wanting to seem a little "sucky" - Brad, your courage and commitment to customers and the skinning community in this instance is another reason why I will always support Stardock and its products. Well done!
bakerstreet
Reply #59 Sunday, July 31, 2005 6:57 PM
I agree with you, Brad. If anyone who has read what I have written on the subject, I differ heavily with being selective in terms of this. If Microsoft has a stance on "look and feel", they need to bite the bullet and enforce it across the board, instead of winking at some and threatening others.
PriyanPhoenix
Reply #60 Sunday, July 31, 2005 6:58 PM
Absolutely. Microsoft are just worried that people will quickly discover that these new "innovations" in Vista are actually possible on XP without a significant loss of system resources (I'm making the natural assumption that the next WindowBlinds release works well!).

Stardock should keep doing as they've always done: releasing great new features that work NOW, not in the grim darkness of the far future...

Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

  • Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
  • Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
  • Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
  • It's simple, and FREE!



web-wc01