...to partition or not to partition...
Wednesday, November 24, 2004 by Essencay | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
So now I'm gonna move my drives to her pc and install the seagates in mine.Since the beginning of my PC experience I've always partitioned my drives down to manageable size partitions, just a left over habit from when Win95 could only handle 2GB partitions. So here are my options...
1. ghost my old drives over to the new drives and use partition magic to stretch the drive partitions afterwards.
2. start afresh and then transfer data files over after my OS is fully installed.
I'm leaning towards no.2, time consuming, but that's not an issue. Question is, should I partition the new drives or not? Also, since I am a sole user on XP Home edition, what benefit does NTFS give me over FAT?
Thanks in advance
Reply #2 Wednesday, November 24, 2004 5:22 PM
NTFS vs FAT is all about stability/security of the system.
Fat is primitive in comparison....only downside to NTFS is that it's 'generally' invisible [the drive] to Dos or Win 9x, etc.
I use Drive Image 7 to create a second bootable OS drive....in caddies so I can switch over quickly if there's an OS 'fragging'.  The 2 drives I use are a 60 and an 80 gig....so both have a 20 gig OS partition to facilitate Imaging.
Otherwise I prefer multiple physical drives.....cos partition or not, if a drive has a mechanical failure ALL data is made from unobtainium irrespective.
BTW...both OS drives access the third Data drive...and that work data is backed up to the OS drive's second partition.  Good old redundancy backups...
 
Reply #3 Wednesday, November 24, 2004 5:35 PM
Reply #4 Wednesday, November 24, 2004 5:51 PM
As far as partitions, it may be good from an organizational standpoint to have separate OS and Data partitions.
Reply #5 Wednesday, November 24, 2004 10:00 PM
Absolutely!! Completely forgot about that.. Give your OS a 10 or 15 GB partition (if you're also installing apps there) and keep all of your data on another partition. This GREATLY reduces your exposure should XP go awry. I never had this happen but you can never be too careful. Actually, using a registry editor or an easier way is using TweakUI for XP, you can store your My Documents, My Music and other default XP folder on the other partition as well to make sure you don't lose that data in case of a disaster.
NTFS vs FAT is all about stability/security of the system.
I'd say cluster size is a big one as well.. I mean with new larger drives, I certainly don't want to lose 16,000+ bytes of my harddrive to the hundreds or thousands of tiny little files that windows creates all over the place. Granted, it's less important on a daily basis than the stability/security but I'd still say it's a factor.
Reply #6 Wednesday, November 24, 2004 10:23 PM
| Wife's harddrive is busting at the seams (20GB) so I went out to get her something bigger and ended up getting myself two 120GB seagates 'cause they were only $60 each after rebates So now I'm gonna move my drives to her pc and install the seagates in mine. |
I'd smack you upside you're head... If you did that to me!

[Message Edited]
Reply #8 Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:25 PM
| So now I'm gonna move my drives to her pc and install the seagates in mine. |
technicians perogative

Reply #9 Thursday, November 25, 2004 3:35 PM
Reply #10 Thursday, November 25, 2004 3:55 PM
Reply #12 Thursday, November 25, 2004 4:38 PM

Reply #14 Friday, November 26, 2004 2:12 PM
Reply #15 Friday, November 26, 2004 2:28 PM
Reply #16 Friday, November 26, 2004 2:37 PM

I installed two new drives...formatted each with three partitions and NTFS...installed XP Home as a fresh install...set up everything the way I want it on the c: partition and now I'm trying to make a backup of it, before I start installing other software and SP2. The only thing that is different with this than my old setup is that I'm using NTFS instead of FAT32. Drive Image thinks there's a disk manager on the MBR and the version of Drive Image I have supports NTFS...so I am at a loss.
Reply #17 Friday, November 26, 2004 2:47 PM
Reply #18 Friday, November 26, 2004 2:49 PM
Reply #19 Friday, November 26, 2004 3:08 PM
Reply #20 Friday, November 26, 2004 5:46 PM
Drive Image 7 is the one you should be using.....images the OS drive on the fly.
2002 won't do that and also does not handle NTFS as well as you'd like it to.  I had the same messages in an older Drive Image.
DI7 is totally pain-free by comparison [2002 is bundled with it].
If you grab it online [as I did] be ready for a big download [400+ meg] ...
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!







Reply #1 Wednesday, November 24, 2004 5:18 PM
Good Luck!