GUI Replacer > Should Stardock have a look at this proggie ????
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 by tcmiller | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
Found a GuiReplacer program and looking at the possibilities it might be something Stardock should have a look at. I can replace more than the 6 AVI's we now have with WB and there is much more.
http://guireplacer.edot.ch/board/index.php?act=idx
Regards,
TCM
[Message Edited]
Reply #2 Tuesday, November 16, 2004 4:11 PM
- You can select what file will be hacked (change explorer.exe, but no
shell32.dll).
- You can select will wmp9 or winamp or any other program will hacked.
- You can do module for only winamp! More program supports coming!
- Lot's of fixes and good error handling...
- Better windows integration, program will be integrated to windows system.
and it will emulate as Microsoft program, then it will not have so much
hacking problems and WFP problems.
- Better UI, for GUIR!
Looks to me like it's an automated way to do what the StyleXP folks have done manually since the beginning. All it does is replace resources in binary files. So, you can change the toolbar icons and such but it would require you to do this seperately for everything. Doesn't even come close to competing with anything WB does.
Reply #3 Wednesday, November 17, 2004 2:53 AM
Regards,
TCM
BTW: I'm sticking with WB !!
Reply #4 Wednesday, November 17, 2004 8:06 AM
Reply #5 Wednesday, November 17, 2004 8:34 AM
| then it will not have so much hacking problems |
No, thankyou....not when 'customer service/assistance' is expected....
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!







Reply #1 Tuesday, November 16, 2004 3:55 PM