Political Poll
Friday, October 15, 2004 by harrison1701 | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
Bush or Kerry?
Where is the "None Of The Above" option? That's what I would choose.
Where is the "None Of The Above" option? That's what I would choose.
 |
|
Page 2 of 7 | |
|
|---|
Island Dog
Reply #22 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:01 PM
I wasn't trying to single out France. I don't hate France, but I do not consider them an ally.
Reply #22 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:01 PM
| Funny how I named four countries, but you only mention France. There is something fascinating about the hatred some Americans have towards France. Not that I care, I'm not from France. |
I wasn't trying to single out France. I don't hate France, but I do not consider them an ally.
NightTrainthedark
Reply #24 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:09 PM
Reply #24 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:09 PM
I understand your point completley paxx. My point is only that noone is perfect. Anyone put under a microscope is going to come away looking bad (except catherine- zeta jones). 
paxx
Reply #25 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:10 PM
Reply #25 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:10 PM
Well, the current Canadian governement doesn't even have the majority. They won't last a whole mandate that's pretty sure.
Sure PEI is not as important as Paris. But it's right next door not accros the ocean. How is it that you are so knowledgable and know not only what PEI is but how much population it has, and yet somebody who is supposed to represent you knows a lot less than you do? Shouldn't your leader be at least as competent as you, if not preferably more?
Heck, why do I know that Providence is the capital of Rhode Island? It's small and and it's one state out of 50. Yet, I - an average Joe - know about it. And yet your country's biggest ambassador doesn't know what PEI is - one province out of only 10.
kona0197
Reply #26 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:12 PM
Reply #26 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:12 PM
I will not vote for Bush. Simply because he is a liar. Bush Stated we went to Iraq because Iraq had WMP. Now we found out that no such weapons existed when in fact over 1000 of our troops have died. Top that off with the fact it was proven Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. They have all died for what? Because of Bush's sick plan to want to control Iraq. We should have been looking for Osama instead of Saddam. To this date he roams free after all those people were killed in 9/11. >
NightTrainthedark
Reply #27 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:16 PM
Reply #27 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:16 PM
Kona, sometime this November Osama will be found. Bet on it!
Bet on it!
kona0197
Reply #28 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:17 PM
Reply #28 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:17 PM
yeah I know... and gas prices will drop as well and Bush will take all the credit. 
Koasati
Reply #29 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:19 PM
No, he did not lie........ he was using intelligence that was supported world wide. Kerry said the same thing, so did Edwards, and Kennedy, and many others. Stop buying into the propaganda from the Micheal Moore's (now there's a realy liar for you), and think for yourself. Bush said Iraq was a "gathering" danger. Kerry and Edwards both said Iraq was an "Eminent" threat, but now they claim Bush said what they said, but they never said what they said........ they make me dizzy.
[Message Edited]
Reply #29 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:19 PM
| I will not vote for Bush. Simply because he is a liar. Bush Stated we went to Iraq because Iraq had WMP. |
[Message Edited]
Keila
Reply #30 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:20 PM
Reply #30 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:20 PM
I can see that this is going to turn into a debate and not a very good one.
Have we not found in the past that political discussions do not go well on this board.
Have we not found in the past that political discussions do not go well on this board.
Koasati
Reply #32 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:23 PM
Reply #32 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:23 PM
Why are so many concerned weather Saddam had anything to do with 9/11 anyway.......... that's just a smokescreen from the Dems. This is the War on Terror, not the war against on those that had something to do with 9/11 directly.
kona0197
Reply #33 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:33 PM
Reply #33 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:33 PM
I do think for myself, thank you. But what Bush should have done as soon as he found out there was no reason to be in Iraq he should have pulled the boys out. Granted Bush was using messed up Intel on the situation but I still think we should have spent more resources on Osama then Saddam and Iraq. AND Bush has not created any jobs.. I see that every day here in Oregon. Unemployment lines are long and jobs are very short. And the Gas prices need to be dealt with as well.
As far as Micheal Moore - Haven't seen his movie or read anything he wrote yet.
As far as Micheal Moore - Haven't seen his movie or read anything he wrote yet.
Koasati
Reply #34 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:46 PM
Reply #34 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:46 PM
Bush did not create the recession, and he certainly had nothing to do with the one million jobs lost after 9/11, or the problems that it caused with the economy. I watched my business die on 9/12, and it didn't get better until after the Bush tax cuts. 1.6 million jobs created in the last 13 months, is not no jobs created. Gas proces have more to do with new world demand, and the fact that, thanks to the left, we don't have enough refinery capacity here in the US. We could ship in 3 times as much oil and it would make no difference. We're at maxmimum refinement capacity now.
Island Dog
Reply #35 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:55 PM
Kerry also "lied" about WMD. Along with most democrats including Hillary Clinton, Ted Kennedy, and John Edwards. Are they "liars" also?
Also, there are troops right now looking for osama. Just because it doesn't make the news doesn't mean it isn't happening.
It's really up for debate if any President creates or loses jobs. Just because unemployment lines are long doesn't mean no jobs have been created.
Reply #35 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:55 PM
| I will not vote for Bush. Simply because he is a liar. Bush Stated we went to Iraq because Iraq had WMP. Now we found out that no such weapons existed when in fact over 1000 of our troops have died. Top that off with the fact it was proven Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. They have all died for what? Because of Bush's sick plan to want to control Iraq. We should have been looking for Osama instead of Saddam. To this date he roams free after all those people were killed in 9/11. |
Kerry also "lied" about WMD. Along with most democrats including Hillary Clinton, Ted Kennedy, and John Edwards. Are they "liars" also?
Also, there are troops right now looking for osama. Just because it doesn't make the news doesn't mean it isn't happening.
| AND Bush has not created any jobs.. I see that every day here in Oregon. Unemployment lines are long and jobs are very short. And the Gas prices need to be dealt with as well. |
It's really up for debate if any President creates or loses jobs. Just because unemployment lines are long doesn't mean no jobs have been created.
Island Dog
Reply #36 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:58 PM
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5526897986
Reply #36 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:58 PM
| Kona, sometime this November Osama will be found. Bet on it! |
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5526897986
Watson
Reply #38 Friday, October 15, 2004 3:41 PM
Reply #38 Friday, October 15, 2004 3:41 PM
kona, are you under the blind deception that NOBODY is looking for Osama, ok, and what of the probably 1/4 of the forces in Afghanistan who can't say a word to anyone about anything they're doing because that is exactly what they're doing, looking for Osama. Just because you don't look on the news and have someone there proclaim they just saw 10 ARMY Special Forces soldiers walking through the woods yelling "Osama, Olly Olly Oxen Free!" Doesn't mean it's not happening.
[Message Edited]
[Message Edited]
MadDeez
Reply #39 Friday, October 15, 2004 3:55 PM
Reply #39 Friday, October 15, 2004 3:55 PM
well, i delivered my absenteee ballot today. i cast a write-in vote for joseph biden. in my opinion, he's much more qualified to lead this country. it's just too bad bubba bill can't run for re-election. i'm a registered democrat but have always voted for the person, not the party. i can't stand it when somebody says he/she voted a straight ballot
i'm a registered democrat but have always voted for the person, not the party. i can't stand it when somebody says he/she voted a straight ballot
Essencay
Reply #40 Friday, October 15, 2004 4:18 PM
Reply #40 Friday, October 15, 2004 4:18 PM
Funny how the folks who have put themselves in harm's way and their families have a more positive outlook about the economy and Iraq.... http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/10/15/military.poll.ap/ ....and Bush. I know it's a poll, but this isn't just 3 to 4 percentage points here.
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
|
|
Page 2 of 7 | |
|
|---|
Reply #21 Friday, October 15, 2004 2:00 PM
Say you are having a business lunch with a potential client or business partner. You meet him at the restaurant and greet him with a smile. Then you ask "So, how's youre lovely wife Lynda doing?"... Oops, his wife's name is Janet.