What is the different between jpeg and jpeg 2000
Wednesday, September 1, 2004 by joetheblow | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
Other than the fact that its the latest iteration of jpeg. Who has used it and why? I am about to download a plug-in that allows FireFox to view 2000. (along with Netscape)
What do you guys and web developers think?
What do you guys and web developers think?
craeonics
Reply #2 Wednesday, September 1, 2004 3:08 AM
Reply #2 Wednesday, September 1, 2004 3:08 AM
And since it isn't integrated into browsers by default (patent issues), it isn't going anywhere either. It's not necessarily lossless, by the way.
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG2000
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG2000
joetheblow
Reply #3 Wednesday, September 1, 2004 12:54 PM
Reply #3 Wednesday, September 1, 2004 12:54 PM
I see... thanks for the commentary. It would seem png is where its at.
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
Reply #1 Wednesday, September 1, 2004 2:11 AM