The Skin Review

Wednesday, July 28, 2004 by Hus | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk

I have an idea I want to run by you guys. I want to start a group that will rate and review skins. Now, not just your random rating and comment, a very thorough review, with detailed explanations as to why, what, where and when. Also, it MUST require atleast 3 very knowledgeable people. Each person being an expert in his/her field, thus being able to give a better explanation. Here's an example...

We would rate a skin on categories...

Originality
Graphics
Assembly

First person would rate the overall skin design and it's originality. The 2nd person would be a graphics expert, and thus be able to rate the graphics quality properly. The 3rd person would rate on how the skin was put together, if any bugs, etc, so that person must be efficient in building skins. Average the 3 ratings and you get the final rating. We could do it weekly, like the Weekly Review and highlight one skin, and give it the rundown.

If you guys want to try and do something like this, post your thoughts. I figured we would first start out with Windowblind skins and branch out from there. So for a well-rounded review, we would need a Skin-Studio expert, and a graphics expert. I would be the "Originality" expert...

This is just the base idea, if it does get off the ground, we would probably make a JoeUser account and post links in the comments section of the skins we rate. Maybe once the new WC is here, we could have it right here on WC.
44 Reply 4 Referrals
First Previous Page 1 of 3 Next Last
CerebroJD
Reply #1 Wednesday, July 28, 2004 7:33 PM
Good idea. Although, I think a fourth, Overall Feel judge would need to be in there. That would really be something neat to have. I, personally, would find a detailed review on a skin I made very helpful.

Question: Would the author be contacted for permission to review the skin in question?

Hus
Reply #2 Wednesday, July 28, 2004 7:50 PM
Why would we need permission to rate and review a skin? We can all do that now without it...

CerebroJD
Reply #3 Wednesday, July 28, 2004 7:51 PM
Well yeah, but if were gonna totally go gung-ho on it, the author might not be too happy if we really got nit-picky on it. No big deal...I know I wouldnt care.

Constructive critisism taken to the max!

Keila
Reply #4 Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:03 PM
I think it is a very interesting idea. I tend to not rate on most things because I will not do it without a comment and if I do not like something I tend not to comment. I know, it's not the best way to do things because it does not help authors improve but I just am that way.
I would not be acceptable for WB "IMO" because I have only done a few. I would though be more then qualified for rating CursorXP under any of the categories.

CerebroJD
Reply #5 Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:08 PM
I'm not stellar at any of the three that you mentioned Hus, but I would be good at giving an overall opinion of the feel of the skin, and summarizing the results of the the judges.

MindlessPuppet
Reply #6 Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:13 PM
As skinning becomes more popular and commercial it's only obvious that it will be put under review. Video game authors and movie producers don't have say in who reviews what, so yeah. I like the idea. I for one would like to volunteer to fill the roll of the originality reviewer.

This would be especially useful if WC2k5 supports premium suites, it'd help give users a better idea what they are spending their money on when they buy.

Essencay
Reply #7 Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:18 PM
Just my two cents....I think this is an idea with merit, but I leave you with this....offer to do an in-depth review and to send it via email in the skin's comments. It'll save you time, knowing which folks don't want to bother or don't really care what others think and focus your attention on skinners that do want constructive feedback to help improve their skills.

Essencay
Reply #8 Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:19 PM
premium suites
are another thing...in depth reviews of those should be made public....allows the masses to understand the quality they're getting

CerebroJD
Reply #9 Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:22 PM
Organix = Originality (didnt you do Demenaecons too? )

Good point on the premium suites...that would definately be a plus for those.

Hus
Reply #10 Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:34 PM
Essencay, while skinners may or may not want constructive criticism, the downloaders would sure like to know also. It's great if the skinners do appreciate the review, but it's not a necessity. Constructive criticism is a rare thing now-a-days, so if they don't like the review...they should make a better skin next time.

I'll be keeping notes of who wants to try it out. I'll let the thread live for a while before picks are made...it will give me some time to work on the fine details.


Frogboy
Reply #11 Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:35 PM
This is a really good idea.

CerebroJD
Reply #12 Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:56 PM
Approval from the top! Nice...

voo
Reply #13 Wednesday, July 28, 2004 9:12 PM
Hippy and myself spoke about this when we saw MacThemes does the same thing with fully skinned kits.

Have a look see how they do it
http://www.macthemes.net/reviews/themes.php

They do more or less as Hus said on his first post.
Something I was hoping the next WC would do hopefully... so who knows what will happen.

Koasati
Reply #14 Wednesday, July 28, 2004 9:20 PM
Great idea Hus........ if I may make a suggestion, You might consider having more than one 'expert' in each category. Not only would this help keep the reviews as unbiased as possible, but also you won't find yourself up a creek if someone is unavailable for a time. You know "Real Life", computer probs, etc.... 



Powered by SkinBrowser!

CerebroJD
Reply #15 Wednesday, July 28, 2004 9:24 PM
Real Life


*gasp* Speak of this no more, it is blasphemy.

Hus
Reply #16 Wednesday, July 28, 2004 9:40 PM
Koasati, that's a very good point you made. I was just thinking about that myself, so expect to see lots of different expert reviewers. Now all we need is more volunteers.

I'm gone for the night, so if anyone want's to volunteer, just post here or you can email me. The address is in my profile.
[Message Edited]

WOM
Reply #17 Wednesday, July 28, 2004 10:16 PM
I tend to look at the comments to see if there is something wrong, not working or somethings left out or not skinned. Thats only if I'am thinking about downloading it. Other than that I really don't care what the comments say. If I like it and it works I'll download it. If After I DL it and it's what I want, I'll keep it and rate it. If Its not what I expected I'll still rate it. I don't rate many windowblinds as I don't download many.



Powered by SkinBrowser!

elvee
Reply #18 Wednesday, July 28, 2004 10:46 PM
It is good to see something like this to come together...but how would this effect the new proposed "Rank Via Weight System" that was talked about some time ago?



Powered by SkinBrowser!

CerebroJD
Reply #19 Wednesday, July 28, 2004 10:51 PM
I think a new user would have to be created, and promoted to something like Journeyman status. Then as a group, a rating would be decided upon, and the leader of the committie(sp) would go make the "official rating" for the skin. A link would also be posted to the in-depth analysis of the skin.

Oooh, I've got a name for the group: The Masters Guild

yrag
Reply #20 Wednesday, July 28, 2004 11:02 PM
It's "committee", Honey and what you propose already exist it's called the Government

Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

  • Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
  • Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
  • Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
  • It's simple, and FREE!
Login
First Previous Page 1 of 3 Next Last

Home | About | Privacy | Upload Guidelines | Terms of Service | Help
Copyright © Stardock Corporation. All Rights Reserved.


web-wc01