Why would they reject these wallpapers?
Sunday, January 11, 2004 by JCSCustomize | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
HERE THEY ARE:
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-10/417774/red-lightning.jpg
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-10/417774/matrix.jpg
NOTE: The matrix wallpaper has an exactly 86% quality loss to save space on my account and the redlighting one has an exactly 25% quality loss.
Reply #2 Sunday, January 11, 2004 5:35 AM
And stop creating several threads on the same subject, you'll just annoy everyone
Reply #3 Sunday, January 11, 2004 5:38 AM
Reply #4 Sunday, January 11, 2004 5:38 AM
Reply #5 Sunday, January 11, 2004 5:41 AM
Reply #6 Sunday, January 11, 2004 6:20 AM
)
Reply #7 Sunday, January 11, 2004 6:21 AM
If you wish a public discussion you may have one.....the original submissions can be reviewed and critiqued in the public spotlight, though that is rarely the best course of action...
As to 'lot of people'...currently there are 892 members logged in. Yes, this is a large site....
Reply #8 Sunday, January 11, 2004 6:47 AM
Matrix one is too common....there are plenty just alike in the library already....though in this case the max res appears to be 800x600 which is simply too small for modern use computers and the huge text is both distracting and poorly executed.
The Lightning one is equally as common a topic as leaping dolphins and about as equally done to death....and perhaps too simplistic to be popular.
As for the third as yet unapproved...When someone spends literally hundreds of dollars on Photoshop, surely it is not just so you can make groovy lens flares. The proggy is just a 'little' more powerful and capable than that...
Reply #9 Sunday, January 11, 2004 7:00 AM
Reply #10 Sunday, January 11, 2004 7:50 AM
As for "I'm only using Photoshop" .... some of the really talented people here (certainly not me!) turn out great work using MS Paint!
G'Day Jafo .... I gather the 'Photographic Section' is hiding in the 'Bootskin' library?
Reply #11 Sunday, January 11, 2004 8:17 AM
| When someone spends literally hundreds of dollars on Photoshop |
"IF" they do that Jafo ... "IF" they really do spend the money .... they get a pretty good manual to kick-start the proggie.
I'm just a cynic ...
Reply #12 Sunday, January 11, 2004 8:17 AM
Reply #13 Sunday, January 11, 2004 8:48 AM
horiz0n....yes, Helder's work is something special. Whenever a person 'claims' his own work is brilliant and peerless I just direct them to works by Nuvem [and others] for the sake of comparison.
Generally you then must have a pretty big head to continue to assert 'brilliance' in the face of such example...
Reply #14 Sunday, January 11, 2004 9:34 AM
Reply #16 Monday, January 12, 2004 2:27 AM
I do however consider bold and underlining as a means to emphasize certain words when using messaging systems such as this, as that is undoubtedly what they're there for
Reply #17 Monday, January 12, 2004 2:44 AM
| This is the standard you should be aiming for |
Do all the wallpapers here consist of graphical images? I appreciate their talent. It is quite brilliant (I couldn't possibly imaging creating something like that!) but my tastes lie in real beauty, images of the world as it really is, so I certainly hope that isn't wincustomizes only standard for wallpapers.
My current wallpaper:
http://www.webshots.com/g/13/96-sh/43341.html
Though because it is webshots, it will probably change by tomorrow because their photos are quite breathtaking and never stop coming!
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
Reply #1 Sunday, January 11, 2004 5:31 AM