Tech memory question. I need some input please.
Sunday, December 21, 2003 by jarget | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
Thanks
Reply #2 Sunday, December 21, 2003 2:08 PM
| #1 by Sir Tech Cat - 12/21/2003 2:05:38 PM I think it would depend on how you use your computer. If you don't run a lot of applications at the same time, then I don't think it would make a difference. If you do a lot of multitasking, then I think it might make a difference. |
I'd be doing some multitasking but not heavy and I would be running a few Desktop enhancements i.e. Windowblinds,WindowFX,DesktopX,Hoverdesk sometimes all at the same time.
Reply #3 Sunday, December 21, 2003 2:18 PM
Reply #4 Sunday, December 21, 2003 2:18 PM
Reply #5 Sunday, December 21, 2003 2:29 PM
Also, what yrag said is correct. I run 1Gb of PC4000 with no virtual memory...speedy
.Reply #6 Sunday, December 21, 2003 2:35 PM
Reply #7 Sunday, December 21, 2003 3:16 PM
Don't know if it's true....but someone once told me an investment in more memory will speed up your machine more than spending it upgrading your CPU.
Reply #8 Sunday, December 21, 2003 3:20 PM
I have a question concerning memory also...........
I presently have 512 Megs of RAM DDR266 PC2100.
When I have programs such as Paint Shop Pro, SkinStudio, or Opera minimized, and I restore them, they are slow to respond for a short time. Is this a memory issue? Would more RAM help? Is there anything I can do until I can afford a couple of new sticks of 512. I once had the Virtual memory on a seperate HD, but that didn't seem to make any difference.

Reply #9 Sunday, December 21, 2003 3:40 PM
Had to take XP off it and put Win98 back on 'cause it was doing what Koasati's computer was doing and worse. You might try shutting down any unnecessary background services until you can get more memory. If you go to Google and search "WinXP Services" you'll find a million and one answers to what services are unnecessary that Windows turns on by default.Reply #10 Sunday, December 21, 2003 3:49 PM
Reply #11 Sunday, December 21, 2003 3:50 PM
Something that I do at times is defrag memory so it returns the small spaces of free memory which is marked as used because a program has used only a few bits of the whole sector of ram. Defraging allows all the little parts to be put into contiguous order so you have less little chunks of free ram that your system can not use.
Also, when defragging memory it removes DLL's which are not in use anymore because the application was closed yet Windows holds them as cached in memory for faster loading the next time you run the application.
More RAM is always good without a doubt and you will always see a gain in system performance when you add RAM. Free disk space is also something that helps because all applications swap to disk, which is where a ram disk comes in handy for certain types of applications...
But even RAMdisks demand as much RAM installed as you can afford or if price isn't an issue having the system filled to the gills will always be best...
Reply #12 Sunday, December 21, 2003 4:00 PM
This guy was on The Screensavers T.V. show, I think it was last week. He has put alot of time in figuring this stuff out. I've disabled alot of services using his advice without any problems on my pc.
Reply #13 Sunday, December 21, 2003 4:07 PM
Thanx essencay.... that's one of the first things I do after a fresh install of XP, but I'm going to take a look at that link and see if I've missed anything. 
John, I figured that was what was happening.
I have the option of defragging memory from my HvD CPU/RES monitor, but I was never sure if using it was a good idea. I'll be using more often now.
Adding more RAM is something I've planned to do for a while......... just waiting for business to pick up (the wife says, groceries come first
)
Thanx guys! 

Reply #14 Sunday, December 21, 2003 4:34 PM

Reply #15 Sunday, December 21, 2003 6:20 PM
Doesn't matter what you have or how you use it it'll always not be fast enough...
1 gig PC3200 DDR400fsb Dual channel for 800 throughput matched to 800fsb CPU and MoBo...
Reply #16 Sunday, December 21, 2003 8:31 PM

Reply #17 Monday, December 22, 2003 2:35 AM

I've spent too much money this past month.

Thanks for all the input peeps.
[Message Edited]
Reply #18 Monday, December 22, 2003 2:53 PM
with any cpu i recomend at least 512 meg of ram 1.0gig is better, specially with a resource hog like xp....any thing below 512 meg of ram and it will seem to run slower...basically cause the less available ram there is the more the os has to casche in the swap file on the hard drive.. and we all know that a hdd is way slower than ram...
also if u get 1 gig of ram and over u can reset the pageing or swap fil to a minimal size so the majority of it is set to ram...this increses pc responce time significantly...
id also recomend a v card with atleast 128 meg of ram... most new progs use more intense graphics , which will make your pc seem to lagg if u have a smaller video card ....
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!







Reply #1 Sunday, December 21, 2003 2:05 PM