Newsflash - Saddam captured!
Sunday, December 14, 2003 by Fuzzy Logic | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
News just out that Saddam Hussein has been captured in Iraq. Tune in to your local news station for live reports.
[Message Edited]
[Message Edited]
 |
|
Page 6 of 12 | |
|
|---|
Tech-Cat
Reply #102 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:13 PM
Reply #102 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:13 PM
I am a conservative and rather than being influenced by conservative media, instead I just find them saying exactly what I am thinking. Face it, a Democratic president would do nothing to fight terrorism. Clinton did nothing to fight terror all the eight years he was in office. I hold Clinton partially responsible for 9/11.
kongit
Reply #103 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:14 PM
Reply #103 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:14 PM
My mind is free from politics. I for one don't care for Bush either. He is a decent president (I think Clinton was a better one). I haven't studied up on the other canidates yet so I don't have an opinion if bush should stay in office.
I am glad Saddam was found, I didn't enjoy us going to war with Irag, but I understood its necessity, and it wasn't weapons of mass destruction. As it stood the UN was willing to keep Saddam in power even though he was almost the antiphony of the UNs ideal.
I am glad Saddam was found, I didn't enjoy us going to war with Irag, but I understood its necessity, and it wasn't weapons of mass destruction. As it stood the UN was willing to keep Saddam in power even though he was almost the antiphony of the UNs ideal.
kona0197
Reply #104 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:15 PM
Reply #104 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:15 PM
Then I as a fellow citzen am ashamed of you.
All you conservatives and liberals do is fight about the issues and nothing gets done.
Hence the reason I stand alone.
All you conservatives and liberals do is fight about the issues and nothing gets done.
Hence the reason I stand alone.
macrobaye
Reply #105 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:15 PM
AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA
I'm sorry, Tech Cat, but I just lost ALL respect for you. Take that Sir from your name and bend over, because you just shot yourself in the foot.
Clinton had no previous knowledge that 9/11 would happen. DUBYA did! It's that simple.
Reply #105 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:15 PM
| I hold Clinton partially responsible for 9/11. |
AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA
I'm sorry, Tech Cat, but I just lost ALL respect for you. Take that Sir from your name and bend over, because you just shot yourself in the foot.
Clinton had no previous knowledge that 9/11 would happen. DUBYA did! It's that simple.
Orion
Reply #106 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:15 PM
You can't get more right-wing than me, but even I can't make that leap...
Reply #106 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:15 PM
| I hold Clinton partially responsible for 9/11. |
You can't get more right-wing than me, but even I can't make that leap...
IPlural
Reply #107 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:16 PM
Reply #107 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:16 PM
Oh hell Tech Cat if Bill Clinton had presented a need to invade Iraq or anyone else before 9/11 took place people would have freaked...
Republicans would have snapped and Congress would have been struck even stupider than they have been since 9/11...
Republicans would have snapped and Congress would have been struck even stupider than they have been since 9/11...
Tech-Cat
Reply #108 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:17 PM
Wow, are you one of those nutcases that believes in a joint Bush and Israel conspiracy to let 9/11 happen?
Reply #108 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:17 PM
| Clinton had no previous knowledge that 9/11 would happen. DUBYA did! It's that simple. |
Wow, are you one of those nutcases that believes in a joint Bush and Israel conspiracy to let 9/11 happen?
Aqua.
Reply #109 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:20 PM
Reply #109 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:20 PM
Well, apparently I'm more liberal than many of you, and even I admit that part of the blame falls on Clinton.
No, he didn't know it was going to happen, but it happened, in part, because of his policies.
I also hold Bush to be partially responsible, but I reject the line of thinking that he knew about it beforehand. Do you have any idea about the sheer vast number of false terrorist threats we find about every single day? One true one is a needle in a great big haystack, especially when you're not specifically searching for it.
No, he didn't know it was going to happen, but it happened, in part, because of his policies.
I also hold Bush to be partially responsible, but I reject the line of thinking that he knew about it beforehand. Do you have any idea about the sheer vast number of false terrorist threats we find about every single day? One true one is a needle in a great big haystack, especially when you're not specifically searching for it.
kona0197
Reply #110 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:21 PM
Reply #110 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:21 PM
Hey Tech - dosen't feel to good does it? At least I am not to bold in my political statements.
Change your views and free your mind.
I hope the next president is better than Bush.
At least when Clinton was in Office he created more jobs than Bush did.
Change your views and free your mind.
I hope the next president is better than Bush.
At least when Clinton was in Office he created more jobs than Bush did.
macrobaye
Reply #112 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:22 PM
obviously you haven't read the news...
Bush was given information in a CIA memo that predicted terrorist activity sometime during the week that 9/11 happened! I'm not saying he conspired with Israel. He's just a moron.
I guess it took him until 9/12 to finish reading it
Reply #112 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:22 PM
| Wow, are you one of those nutcases that believes in a joint Bush and Israel conspiracy to let 9/11 happen? |
obviously you haven't read the news...
Bush was given information in a CIA memo that predicted terrorist activity sometime during the week that 9/11 happened! I'm not saying he conspired with Israel. He's just a moron.
I guess it took him until 9/12 to finish reading it
macrobaye
Reply #113 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:23 PM
hahahaha Kona I agree, but let's take that out of context for a sec....
hhahahahah he definatle created more JOBS
Reply #113 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:23 PM
| At least when Clinton was in Office he created more jobs than Bush did. |
hahahaha Kona I agree, but let's take that out of context for a sec....
hhahahahah he definatle created more JOBS
Peff
Reply #114 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:24 PM
@ Travis.....that, he did!!! Doubt if dubya's ever had one!!
Reply #114 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:24 PM
@ Travis.....that, he did!!! Doubt if dubya's ever had one!!
Tech-Cat
Reply #115 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:24 PM
Good point about the needle in the haystack thing. I wonder how Bush can be held responsible to any degree if he did not know 9/11 was going to happen and he was only in office for almost nine months when 9/11 happened. Don't also forget that Sore/Loserman through a fit about Florida which slowed down the transistion of power. Bush came into office less prepared than the average new president because of all the legal wrangling from the Sore/Loserman camp who's lawyers were the same lawyers that tried to take down Microsoft.
Reply #115 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:24 PM
| I also hold Bush to be partially responsible, but I reject the line of thinking that he knew about it beforehand. Do you have any idea about the sheer vast number of false terrorist threats we find about every single day? One true one is a needle in a great big haystack, especially when you're not specifically searching for it. |
Good point about the needle in the haystack thing. I wonder how Bush can be held responsible to any degree if he did not know 9/11 was going to happen and he was only in office for almost nine months when 9/11 happened. Don't also forget that Sore/Loserman through a fit about Florida which slowed down the transistion of power. Bush came into office less prepared than the average new president because of all the legal wrangling from the Sore/Loserman camp who's lawyers were the same lawyers that tried to take down Microsoft.
Tech-Cat
Reply #116 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:27 PM
Presidents don't create jobs. I would have to say that Clinton is partially responsible for the lose of jobs since he made a deal with China that put more sweat shops there taking jobs from home. Also, it's important to remember that the economy started going bad before the end of Clinton's last term. Also, 9/11 was an event that was a blow on the economy too.
Reply #116 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:27 PM
| At least when Clinton was in Office he created more jobs than Bush did. |
Presidents don't create jobs. I would have to say that Clinton is partially responsible for the lose of jobs since he made a deal with China that put more sweat shops there taking jobs from home. Also, it's important to remember that the economy started going bad before the end of Clinton's last term. Also, 9/11 was an event that was a blow on the economy too.
IPlural
Reply #118 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:28 PM
Reply #118 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:28 PM
Orion 
It takes a bit of looking through history and all but the root of terrorism pretty much sits in the lap of foreign policies over the years which disenfrachised numourous peoples from a number of social systems throughout the world. It wasn't just the US or any one nation which played a hand in it's evolution but every nation that has delt with others off their respective borders as a means of personal and national gain...
For instance, during WWII the Japinease had done a lot of research into Bioweapons which they used against the Chinese in occupied territory. They weaponized Anthrax, Plauge and a couple of other things. The Plauge was introduced with Fleas and thousands were killed from it, they also did human experiments and even did this to US Pows.
When the war ended for them we rushed to the enternment camp/pow prision and we gathered all the information and research papers and we also nabbed the head scientist and camp leader (same person) and wisked him to the USA under our protection. The Russians demanded we turn the guy in for the War crimes trials because he had also gotten hold of some Russains and they didn't want us to have him working for us either. We refused tot run him over and it got pretty heated, but in the end the son of a gun lived a nice happy life until his death in the good ol USA creating a number of WDM's.
England has played at similar things, France, all nations to some extent, but few as blatantly.
My point is...
Blaming Clinton is to simplistic, hence Inane...
It takes a bit of looking through history and all but the root of terrorism pretty much sits in the lap of foreign policies over the years which disenfrachised numourous peoples from a number of social systems throughout the world. It wasn't just the US or any one nation which played a hand in it's evolution but every nation that has delt with others off their respective borders as a means of personal and national gain...
For instance, during WWII the Japinease had done a lot of research into Bioweapons which they used against the Chinese in occupied territory. They weaponized Anthrax, Plauge and a couple of other things. The Plauge was introduced with Fleas and thousands were killed from it, they also did human experiments and even did this to US Pows.
When the war ended for them we rushed to the enternment camp/pow prision and we gathered all the information and research papers and we also nabbed the head scientist and camp leader (same person) and wisked him to the USA under our protection. The Russians demanded we turn the guy in for the War crimes trials because he had also gotten hold of some Russains and they didn't want us to have him working for us either. We refused tot run him over and it got pretty heated, but in the end the son of a gun lived a nice happy life until his death in the good ol USA creating a number of WDM's.
England has played at similar things, France, all nations to some extent, but few as blatantly.
My point is...
Blaming Clinton is to simplistic, hence Inane...
Tech-Cat
Reply #119 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:29 PM
FDR was also a socialist and created the national debt problem we have today.
Reply #119 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:29 PM
| FDR created lots of jobs |
FDR was also a socialist and created the national debt problem we have today.
Peff
Reply #120 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:30 PM
Reply #120 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:30 PM
Didn't he also create the temporary federal income tax?
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
|
|
Page 6 of 12 | |
|
|---|
Reply #101 Sunday, December 14, 2003 10:11 PM
I'm not a liberal...
even if you'd like to slap that on me with your paint brush... it doesn't make it anymore a fact
Try reading USNew which is NOT Liberal or Conservative