Star Trek Thread
Monday, September 22, 2003 by kona0197 | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
OK anyone who is a Trekkie can post logical stuff here I guess. I just had a stupid question. Has anyone noticed that UPN quit showing DS9 at night?
 |
|
Page 2 of 2 | |
|
|---|
Chris
Reply #23 Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:47 AM
Reply #23 Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:47 AM
I may be wrong about this, but I read somewhere that TNT (now Spike TV) would start airing DS9 in 2004 or 2005. I'm not sure what the rationale for such a late date is, unless it's syndication rights won't be up for grabs again until then, perhaps?
[Message Edited]
[Message Edited]
Fuzzy Logic
Reply #24 Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:49 AM
I've fixed it! Your bicycle should run fine now...
[Message Edited]
Reply #24 Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:49 AM
I've fixed it! Your bicycle should run fine now...
[Message Edited]
kona0197
Reply #25 Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:07 PM
Reply #25 Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:07 PM
thanks cheif. remind me to nuy you smoe blood wine!
kona0197
Reply #26 Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:09 PM
(damn spelling)
Should read thanks chief, remind me to buy you some blood wine!
Reply #26 Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:09 PM
| thanks cheif. remind me to nuy you smoe blood wine! |
(damn spelling)
Should read thanks chief, remind me to buy you some blood wine!
Fuzzy Logic
Reply #27 Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:09 PM
Sounds like you've been at the blood wine already
Reply #27 Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:09 PM
| thanks cheif. remind me to nuy you smoe blood wine! |
Sounds like you've been at the blood wine already
GhoS
Reply #28 Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:59 PM
Reply #28 Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:59 PM
I really wanted to see "Enterprise" succeed for a couple reasons. One is because I have thoroughly enjoyed Trek through the years although not DS9 as much, but that is more due to it airing at times I couldn't watch, and too lazy to tape lol. Another reason though is because I liked Scott Bakula's earlier work, especially Quantum Leap. But this series has not done it for me. I find the stories less than compelling, and they seem to drag along. Archer has been made to not be as strong in making decisions at times, and no real characters that stand out.
Although it was a good idea to go back in time story-wise, it just doesn't work because our tech was so poor in the 60's, the series that should come after "Enterprise" as far as chronologically, looks like something from our recent past, not our near future. I believe they would have been better served having a series based on Vulcan or Klingon characters. Now that would have been a departure. Instead "Enterprise" is messing up the timeline.
And its apparent that this show isn't doing as well, as I just read today they will be adding to the title of the show. It will become know officially as "Star Trek: Enterprise" . Not sure when that takes effect though.
Can't wait to see Adam's work as he puts so much effort into it and has an attention to detail
[Message Edited]
Although it was a good idea to go back in time story-wise, it just doesn't work because our tech was so poor in the 60's, the series that should come after "Enterprise" as far as chronologically, looks like something from our recent past, not our near future. I believe they would have been better served having a series based on Vulcan or Klingon characters. Now that would have been a departure. Instead "Enterprise" is messing up the timeline.
And its apparent that this show isn't doing as well, as I just read today they will be adding to the title of the show. It will become know officially as "Star Trek: Enterprise" . Not sure when that takes effect though.
Can't wait to see Adam's work as he puts so much effort into it and has an attention to detail
[Message Edited]
Fuzzy Logic
Reply #29 Friday, September 26, 2003 8:33 AM
Scanning this thread for intelligent life...indications negative at this time.
Reply #29 Friday, September 26, 2003 8:33 AM
Scanning this thread for intelligent life...indications negative at this time.
Fuzzy Logic
Reply #30 Friday, September 26, 2003 8:42 AM
Sybok: "Spock, could this be Heaven"
Spock: "I believe it is - but i thought it would have a more ethereal name than Wincustomize..."
Reply #30 Friday, September 26, 2003 8:42 AM
Sybok: "Spock, could this be Heaven"
Spock: "I believe it is - but i thought it would have a more ethereal name than Wincustomize..."
Fuzzy Logic
Reply #33 Friday, September 26, 2003 11:32 AM
"Why am I wearing clothes this tight? It's not logical..."
Reply #33 Friday, September 26, 2003 11:32 AM
"Why am I wearing clothes this tight? It's not logical..."
Aqua.
Reply #34 Friday, September 26, 2003 3:05 PM
Reply #34 Friday, September 26, 2003 3:05 PM
Of course it's logical! It does not waste any space and you do not have to worry about it getting caught on something.
On a planetary surface such as Vulcan, environmental conditions mandate loose flowing clothing, but on a cramped starship, efficiency is paramount.
Of course.... there's the effect of reducing the efficiency of male crew members working around her
On a planetary surface such as Vulcan, environmental conditions mandate loose flowing clothing, but on a cramped starship, efficiency is paramount.
Of course.... there's the effect of reducing the efficiency of male crew members working around her
Jafo
Reply #35 Friday, September 26, 2003 5:11 PM
Reply #35 Friday, September 26, 2003 5:11 PM
Aqua....get a grip....it's purely a ratings booster.....'hey check out me chest'.....but pity about the hair-do....that's a shocker....
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
|
|
Page 2 of 2 | |
|
|---|
Reply #21 Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:46 AM
Inside leg measurement anyone?