What do you guys think about the educational system?
Tuesday, July 29, 2003 by joetheblow | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
I think it sucks. I have done research to prove it.
It is way to focused on a teacher/student head of the class stand point and mainly has memorization, reading, and writing with a dash of math on the side.
As important as those things are, there are more ways to learn and evryone learns differently.
Did anyone in thier school learn anything about teamwork? How about collaberating on projects?
The US system in piticular was designed in the late 1800's and ealry 1900's. That was when all you really needed to do was work on a assembly line.
21 century, many social scientist, educators, and the idea of children learning differently than adults later; The same system.
Why is that? Why can learning be more hands on?
Anyone agree or disagree?
http://www.thememoryhole.org/edu/school-mission.htm
Not a good link but its ok for discussion.
Reply #2 Tuesday, July 29, 2003 10:12 PM
I am all for the portfolio system. It is not easy, but you learn more and you might actually like it. Plus it is at your own pace.
Reply #3 Tuesday, July 29, 2003 10:17 PM
Funny, College is easier then because of this (although its tough in the beginning cause your used to some one else on your back instead of yourself) and grad school is the best because of this. I'm learning more now then I ever did. The strange thing is I'll finish faster at the pace I am going

Reply #4 Tuesday, July 29, 2003 10:26 PM

Reply #6 Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:32 AM

Reply #7 Wednesday, July 30, 2003 2:54 AM
[Message Edited]
Reply #8 Wednesday, July 30, 2003 3:19 AM
Reply #9 Wednesday, July 30, 2003 6:36 AM
Those schoolgirl days...
Of biting nails and holding hands are goh-oh-on...
[OK, so it's done from memory]...
Reply #10 Wednesday, July 30, 2003 7:12 AM
I think the school system and what you get out of it has a couple main factors:
1) Where the school is (which effects student to teacher ratio)
2) How involved the parent(s) are with the child.
I live in a small community that has lots of interaction with the kids. There are also very small classroom sizes and advanced classes in high school.
But, teaching doesn't end at school. The parents involvement in the process is needed.
i would not home school (past the obvious reason that I work) because I have an only child and I feel that social learning is an extremely important factor. You have to deal with people in unpleasant situations all the time. The diversity of public schools also teaches how to interact socially.
Reply #11 Wednesday, July 30, 2003 7:17 AM
Is it because kids are dumb?
Parents don't take an active part in a child's education? (I think I might honestly have been the last real generation of this.)
Teachers REALLY hate their jobs because they get paid crap these days?
I've seen the Mass graduation exam (I have a nephew in High School) at my old school. Its the most rediculous test known to man, to fail it, you'd have to be illiterate.
And IMO if a kid can make it through school illiterate like apparently happens, then the teachers should be fired for not picking up on it.
The US education system needs some serious revamping. There's just too many new issues popping up that the current system can't handle, between the ever increasing peer pressure on kids, to the blatant fact that teachers just don't care anymore. Or the fact that parents have to work harder these days so they just don't have as much time for their kids as it used to be in the past.
Reply #12 Wednesday, July 30, 2003 10:39 AM
| #11 by Doomgaze - 7/30/2003 7:17:13 AM ....Or the fact that parents have to work harder these days so they just don't have as much time for their kids as it used to be in the past. |
I really think that this plays a major role. When I grew up, it was normal for Moms to stay home or to only work part time. It seems like the norm is now a two income family, which allows for less time for everything. You end up with a lot of latch key kids and parents who are too tired to pay attention when they get home (it's hard enough just to get dinner on the table some days.) (BTW, in case anyone wondered, I am not into Women's lib in the slightest... but don't get me started on that one.....)
Reply #13 Wednesday, July 30, 2003 10:57 AM
Although some of the places I've been on the boat (from the Chesapeake up to Canada) cruising was worth far more of an education than any schooling was.
My parents beleived in going places and learning things... Lots of trips to museams, places like Mystic Seaport in CT, to as far as having been an assistant instructor in Outward Bound, and racing sailboats for far too many years.

Reply #14 Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:03 AM
because there is no way that we could have afforded to travel around, sail or even take many trips to local interests. But, my Mom was always at home when I got home from school and always made sure we got our homework done and always asked "what did you do today?" We also spent the entire summer at the local beach (which was a large lake fed by Lake Michigan) which was cheap but gave us something to do (was really cold, too!).Reply #15 Wednesday, July 30, 2003 2:46 PM
What amazes me is that there have been many studies and conclusions for that matter on how children learn yet it has not been translated to the school system.
I said it before and I'll say it again; The school system focuses to much on memorization and timed tests.
==============================
Education is not about spitting back out data that was instructed by a 'teacher'.
Aslo there is to much focus on the teacher and not enough on the students helping each other out. Working in groups, answering each others questions in class, real field trips, writing more often is more key then making more tests.
I think what will help the system is a change from structured teacher/student classes to children/student (after a specific grade maybe) centered education where the student is the facilitator more than the teacher.
Self-Study: Be in charge of their own studies to a point
Group-Study: Work in teams to discover more than what would be found alone
Srtuctured-Study: Be taught in a way that puts it into memory because you don't want/need to understand why it is (or the theory or it), you just need to know it.
Ex.
E=MC^2
DNA
History of Physics
This is why I think portfolio style education will work for most (and other can get more structured education if they want).
Reply #16 Wednesday, July 30, 2003 6:18 PM
Reply #17 Wednesday, July 30, 2003 6:25 PM
Reply #18 Wednesday, July 30, 2003 6:26 PM
Reply #19 Wednesday, July 30, 2003 6:32 PM
Reply #20 Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:55 PM
Take it from a teacher by trade, I've taught in both the public and the private sector. Yes, the education system would seriously need some updating. The lecture structure dates from way back in ancient Greece, and while it might have been the best way before is not the case now.
But there a will to change. Computers are making their way into the classrooms, but unfortunately there is a lot of resistance coming from both the parents and the teachers.
There has been some reform attempts. For example, in Quebec, there is one on the table right now. A big one too. The whole system would change if/when it comes in place. The governement suggests to "projectize" the subjects. Meaning, instead of learning things for for the sake of learning, to insert the whole curriculum into a project, mixing many subjects into the project. Give the learning a reason to be. Another part of reform affects the sacred report cards. It is asked that report cards now be qualitative, not quantitative. Be objective oriented. Instead of having a percentage, detail in the report cards what were the objectives of the semester and how they were achieved by the student. Where did he/she fail? Where should he improve? Think about it, if you pass your grade with a 60% average, that means that you did not understand 40% of what was tought to you. Yet, you are going to go into the next grade, where it will be assumed that you learned everything fromt he previous grade. You are not going to understand some news things because they are directly linked to your knowing some of the 40% of things you didn't understand. So, you will pass this grade with 60% again if you're lucky. Now you didn't understand 40% of one grade and 40% of the other grade, it all accumulates, but you keep graduating. Anyway, reforms are suggested but they are often received very negatively by both the teachers (mainly the older ones) and the parents. Teachers complain that they weren't trained for that new system, that it will bring extra work. Understandable in a way since, contrarely to common belief, teachers work darn hard. 60 to 70 hours weeks is not uncommon (counting class preparation and corrections). Another resistance come from the parents who often think competively. They don't want to know how good their kid is doing with the objectives given, they want to know how good he is doing compared with his classmates. They want a number. They want 80%, 90%. They don't want to read 5 pages of details explaining where the kid did good and where he could improve.
Yes, our education system needs to evolve. Yes it needs a major revision. But the problem is that people are stuck in the old ways. It's hard to break away from what you are used to.
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!









Reply #1 Tuesday, July 29, 2003 9:42 PM
I like taking in straight knowledge, im in the higher classes in my school so i can avoid these "higher learning" inconviences, this is a students view on the system, it was fine how it was...