Notifications of non-accepeted works
Friday, May 2, 2003 by GreyTata | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
I wonder why, but when our works - and I mention specifically "wallpapers" - are accepted (???) by "moderators", we receive an automated email message saying that a particular design was accepted and ...bla,bla, bla.
However I think that also, when they are not accepted (???) , we should receive an automated email message saying exactly that.
It would spare us a lot of time and the surprise - sometimes a bad one - of when we go to the " My skins" page, those works that were " awainting aproval " just disapeared from the list.
Besides, would be a little more polite from Wincustomize side.
Reply #2 Friday, May 2, 2003 1:17 AM
Reply #5 Friday, May 2, 2003 1:19 AM
Reply #6 Friday, May 2, 2003 1:20 AM
Reply #7 Friday, May 2, 2003 1:25 AM
Reply #8 Friday, May 2, 2003 1:26 AM

Reply #9 Friday, May 2, 2003 1:49 AM
One can self-question why their works were not accepted but being rude, is stupidity.
May be we - specifically wallpapers authors - may not agree with the guidelines that moderators use to accept or not our works, ( I do not agree ) but the rules are set and we have to stand by them.
However, since automated notifications do not allow responses, the issue of abuse is overcomed.

Reply #10 Friday, May 2, 2003 2:35 AM
I personally am not fazed by idiots venting their spleens in sub-human invective....but others were justifiably upset by the constant abuse.
Since the change in policy, life for the admins is somewhat 'happier'...;_
Reply #11 Friday, May 2, 2003 3:20 AM
I am an administrator also in another site/forum, ( sport related ) people do not agree with me (I was insulted once or twice but solved the problem very easily - simply banished the ofenders from thr site ) but I know that as I cannot please do everybody, I am in a fragile position . So, good and common sense are the keywords.For both sides
I still think that even so~, non accepted works should receive an automated notification.
Tell me, what's the difference ( in terms of abuse and insulting )of getting an automated notification or when we go to "My skins" and see that our works waiting for aproval just disapeared ? The agravation for the author is the same.
The difference is that at least, the process of sending a notification is a little bit more polite.

Reply #12 Friday, May 2, 2003 3:51 AM
This is not about a 'difference of opinion' or simple abuse...it's about bruised egos that refuse to accept a decision made by another person, irrespective of reason or qualification.
Invariably, the less puerile antagonist will post a 'why me?' thread similar to this....usually after his own ego is bruised.
The fact of the matter is that there is a finite 'space' allocation for wall content on what is intended as a skinning site, where walls are an adjunct and not the prime directive.
Not all walls will be accepted. They will be subject to selection. If an author has a query about the reason for a particular work being removed he can always send a polite email, however, with the large number of works submitted it is quite impractical to compose a tome of detailed post mortem on everything rejected.
More and more I, for one, am increasingly impressed with the 'quiet acceptance' of some artists whose work so frequently does not pass muster, yet neither criticizes nor complains, just continues to submit.
Call him the 'quiet achiever', but he is more deserving of detailed explanation and help than those many others whose waking moments are engrossed in spit and moan...

Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!







Reply #1 Friday, May 2, 2003 1:17 AM