Online copyrights...
Wednesday, April 16, 2003 by Duff Lite | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
Reply #2 Wednesday, April 16, 2003 1:49 PM
If I recall the time limit used to be something like 70 years after the death of the original artist, though that was challenged by Disney and a few others recently and the US congress was given the right by the supreme court to extend that period. How long they can do it will be determined by further litigation, no doubt...
You can register a work with the office as well, for a fee. All the details for the US are here: http://www.loc.gov/copyright/
Reply #3 Wednesday, April 16, 2003 1:49 PM

Reply #4 Wednesday, April 16, 2003 2:03 PM
All you can really do is register. You are protected regardless, whether you do or don't, it just makes it a lot easier to prove.
Reply #5 Wednesday, April 16, 2003 2:08 PM
Reply #6 Wednesday, April 16, 2003 2:33 PM
Example, how are the works here copyrighted if they are?
Reply #7 Wednesday, April 16, 2003 2:35 PM

Reply #8 Wednesday, April 16, 2003 2:36 PM

Reply #9 Wednesday, April 16, 2003 2:39 PM

Reply #10 Wednesday, April 16, 2003 2:49 PM
Reply #11 Wednesday, April 16, 2003 2:54 PM

Reply #12 Wednesday, April 16, 2003 3:05 PM
Reply #13 Wednesday, April 16, 2003 3:12 PM
Reply #15 Wednesday, April 16, 2003 3:19 PM
I have mailed many manila envelopes using only the little brass thingy to keep it shut. What would prevent me from reopening it at a later date, sliding in a hand-typed screenplay for a popular movie, and sealing it with the glue seal? What would prevent a monolithic corporation to accuse me of doing that if the screenplay *was* original? The postal service makes no claims about the integrity of the envelope, so they really can't testify as to what was in it when they postmarked it.
Sure, someone may have presented that as *part* of their case, but the attorney for the other side would have to be pretty dim if he or she let them get away with it.
Reply #16 Wednesday, April 16, 2003 3:23 PM

Was done via Registered mail...[in Oz]...

Reply #17 Wednesday, April 16, 2003 3:28 PM
If the postage thing *is* true, some one with malicious intent could cost companies a lot of money in legal fees, whether they won or not. I just checked, and I have more than a dozen unsealed manila envelopes postmarked prior to 1995. I used them before major magazines started accepting electronic submissions, and it appears I never licked the glue...
I would really like to see the transcripts from a copyright case that used a postmark for evidence.
Reply #18 Wednesday, April 16, 2003 4:35 PM
Also, when sending something by registered delivery (at least in this country) they stick a large sticker on the package with the date, etc. on. If you requested that they stuck it over the seal of the envelope, I'm sure that would be sufficient. I believe they modify the design of those stickers every year or so too, specifically to prevent fraud.
Reply #19 Wednesday, April 16, 2003 4:38 PM

Reply #20 Wednesday, April 16, 2003 5:01 PM
I'll see what I can dig up with the US postal service. I'm willing to bet that they'll say that they can't verify an envelope hasn't been opened and resealed after delivery, registered or not. IF they can't verify the seal, then they can't say that the work was in it when it was mailed.
On the other hand, if they take responsibility for verifying the integrity of the seal or envelope, then they open themselves up to liability when someone abuses the system. I don't think they would do that. I get letters with torn envelopes pretty often.
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!







Reply #1 Wednesday, April 16, 2003 1:46 PM