About English, in English.

Sunday, April 13, 2003 by AJBlue98 | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk

Hi. So that you know, I'm from the US.


>i got a small doubt in English...since most of u r from the Americas and the Eu, i think you can help.
>
>1. possible
"Possible" means "can happen."


>2. probable
"Probable" means "likely to happen."

>
>ok, suppose u say that:
>Possibly, it is Mr.X who might win the race
>Probably, it is Mr.Y who might win the race

You wouldn't say that. "Possibly" and "probably" are never to be used along with the words "may," "might," "do," "does," "did," "could," or "would."

In English, saying the same thing twice in one sentence is grammatically incorrect. (That's called being "redundant.")

"Must" and "should" are also never used with "possibly" or "probably," because the sentence would make no logical sense.


The proper way to phrase your sentences is like this:

Mr. X probably will win the race.
Mr. Y possibly will win the race.
or
Mr. Z {may, might, can, could, would or should} win the race.

One should only use "should" if he means "probably," and only use "might" or "could" if one doubts that he will.

One can also put "probably" or "possibly" at the beginning of the sentence, as long as it is set off by a comma, but not at the end; sentences in English end only in nouns (people, places, things, or ideas), verbs (actions), or pronouns ("he," "she," "it," "you," "I," "they," "ye," "we," etc..).

"Will win" is one verb, and the two words that form it should never be separated. This goes for all verbs beginning with "to," "has," "have," "had," "may," "might," "must," "do," "does," "did," "can," "could," "will," "would," "shall," and "should."

I hope that answers your question, Lord Vimal!

-AJBlue98

Powered by SkinBrowser!
First Previous Page 1 of 2 Next Last
Jafo
Reply #1 Sunday, April 13, 2003 10:59 PM
Pedantry is alive and well and living in the guise of AJBlue98....
Jafo
Reply #2 Sunday, April 13, 2003 11:03 PM
Possibly 'must' is the word you are seeking.

Used in one sentence, gramatically correct and makes sense too....
Jafo
Reply #3 Sunday, April 13, 2003 11:29 PM
Oh....forgot.
Would have been more appropriate to have all this in Lord Vimal's thread, rather than creating another one....
paxx
Reply #4 Monday, April 14, 2003 5:07 AM
Hehehe, funny:

> One should only use "should" if he means "probably," and only use "might" or "could"
> if one doubts that he will.

Does "should" mean "probably" in that sentence?
I believe "should" can also be an imperative, meaning "must".
craeonics
Reply #5 Monday, April 14, 2003 6:06 AM
"Should" is never "must". Anyhow, what the? What's this all about?
Koasati
Reply #6 Monday, April 14, 2003 7:45 AM
As Jafo pointed out, you really shouldn't have started a new thread to answer Lord Vimal's question. You should have answered within the original thread.................
Or maybe I should start a new thread to tell you this....
BoXXi
Reply #7 Monday, April 14, 2003 9:27 AM
Half past three!
IPlural
Reply #8 Monday, April 14, 2003 11:31 AM
Jafo, would that be meticulousness or arrogance?



Powered by SkinBrowser!
Bangkokboy
Reply #9 Tuesday, April 15, 2003 12:20 PM
what's the fuss? nobody said "had oughta".
KarmaGirl
Reply #10 Tuesday, April 15, 2003 12:39 PM
But, I speak "American" not "English"
Biscuits, crackers, pudding, cake, custard, etc. all have different "English" meanings than they do in "American"....
Bangkokboy
Reply #11 Tuesday, April 15, 2003 2:35 PM
KG - your list of words having different meanings in England is far from complete.
KarmaGirl
Reply #12 Tuesday, April 15, 2003 3:33 PM
psstttt...bkb....that's what the "etc." (meaning etcetera) was for. Obviously, I could spend all day listing words that we use differently. But, I was hungry, so I stuck to the first food words that came to mind
Ingui
Reply #13 Tuesday, April 15, 2003 3:55 PM
After I readed this and knowed what it was about, I feeled it to be gooder if it was putted in the original thread (now that I learnt "possible" and "probable", ima go work on Irregular verbs)
Jafo
Reply #14 Tuesday, April 15, 2003 4:40 PM
'meds' is a good example of differing meanings..
voo
Reply #15 Tuesday, April 15, 2003 4:51 PM
You dont want to learn the Voo langauge then heh

The trouble with Scotland is that it's full of Scots. Perhaps the time has come to reinstitute an old custom.
Fuzzy Logic
Reply #16 Tuesday, April 15, 2003 5:05 PM
Biscuits, crackers, pudding, cake, custard, etc. all have different "English" meanings than they do in "American"....

They have different meanings in Yorkshire than they do in English

Biscuits: Group of 'dim' people
Crackers: Group of nice looking ladies
Pudding: Force applied. i.e. "not enough pudding" = under strength
Cake: Mud stuck to your shoes
Custard: Someone who is "thick" (stupid)

Powered by SkinBrowser!
Fuzzy Logic
Reply #17 Tuesday, April 15, 2003 5:12 PM
And for the original question...

Possibly = I've not even thought about it.
Probably = Thought about it but I'm not going to do it.

Powered by SkinBrowser!
Bangkokboy
Reply #18 Tuesday, April 15, 2003 6:58 PM
is food ever just food in the UK??
Jafo
Reply #19 Tuesday, April 15, 2003 7:02 PM
'food' is NEVER 'food' in the UK....English cuisine is an oxymoron....
Chip butties, anyone?....
Bangkokboy
Reply #20 Tuesday, April 15, 2003 7:13 PM
i don't know what that is, but no, thank you.

surely potatos are safe to order in england?

Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

  • Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
  • Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
  • Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
  • It's simple, and FREE!



web-wc01