Artical in CPU magazine explains something interesting about XP refresh rates and eye strain.
Sunday, March 16, 2003 by IPlural | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
By default without making use of the tweaking software that comes with most driver cd's, XP
will not allow your refresh rates to exceed 60 which can and does cause headaches, eye strain,
blurred vision, etc after a period of time looking at the monitor. From what the artical states
you should set your refresh for monitor and videocard to at least 75 - 80 to save your eyes.
Higher if they will allow it, you have to use a utility to do this, and you also have to make
sure it loads on boot up as Windows XP will return the registry settings to the default of 60
on the next boot...
thought if anyone was noticing issues like this, it might make a difference for you..
Reply #22 Sunday, March 16, 2003 12:27 PM
I tried that RefreshForce app, and had a totally unreadable monitor.

Reply #23 Sunday, March 16, 2003 1:15 PM

You know what you could do, CompUSA, Best Buy and the others have the display models on the shelves for a certain time period, and then go through them and clean them up, give you an in house service contract and sell them way below sticker price. When we started out we picked up some Compaq servers like that for our internal use and they worked great, still do though they were sold to a friend for his hosting startup a couple of years ago...
anyway, just a possibility, I've seen 17 inch Sony flat screen monitors go for under $100.00 when they were going off the shelf in a new cardboard box for over $400.00
That was a while back, but...

Reply #24 Sunday, March 16, 2003 1:21 PM
Reply #25 Sunday, March 16, 2003 1:35 PM
(Version: 1.10)
RefreshForce universally and permanently fixes the Windows 2000/XP refresh rate problem on ANY variation of graphics cards, monitors, or drivers!!! No messing around, no hassle, it WORKS and it's SIMPLE!
Completely fixes the Windows 2000/XP refresh rate problem
Functions regardless of graphics card, and driver versions
One-time execute, no reboot required, and no background program
Ability to push Plug & Play monitor drivers over 85Hz
Support for systems with multiple display adapters
Automatic backup facility
Sophisticated and unique display optimization technology
Ability to actually lower refresh rates as well as increase them, if software causes display corruption
and...
It's freeware!
http://www.pagehosting.co.uk/rf/

Reply #26 Sunday, March 16, 2003 1:57 PM
That said - I've never had any problems with refresh rates resetting to 60 on the 19" monitor attached to my Radeon 8500 upstairs. I went it, set them all at 75Mhz, and I've been happy since. (Honestly, there's little benefit to your eyes pushing it higher than the 75-80 range, and as your refresh rate gets higher, your image quality starts to suffer.)
Reply #27 Sunday, March 16, 2003 2:33 PM
even in that artical they said later on that between 75 - 80 was best, because above that the human eye can not discern any difference and it does lower the MTF... *snap* click, Hhhhhhmmmmmm.... what the hell? seen that more than once years back, when there actually WAS a reason for screen savers...

now all they do is eat resources and not give them all back when they restore the desktop!

Reply #28 Sunday, March 16, 2003 9:48 PM
www.majorgeeks.com/article.php?sid=1457&cat=22
Reply #29 Sunday, March 16, 2003 9:52 PM
Ya gotta have the 'http://' in front...

Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!







Reply #21 Sunday, March 16, 2003 9:32 AM
someone wrote a virus that actually was done to prove that you could kill a monitor with one buy screwing the refresh rates, that was around 1988 if I remember correctly...