Is it justified?
Monday, January 13, 2003 by @shu | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
They are hell bent on taking unilateral action against a nation that is already destroyed by hunger and poverty, even after the UN weapons inspectors have found nothing. Doesn't this make their actions suspect?
Elsewhere, the N. government openly admits to having a nuclear weapons program, but no action is taken against them. The mere possibility of taking action too does not cross the mind of the very same leaders who threaten to blow Iraq into oblivion. Is it due to the fact that N. Korea possesses the capability to retaliate, or the fact that N. Korea does not have any oil reserves to quench the thirst of these oil guzzling, 'developed, first world' countries?
Reply #22 Monday, January 13, 2003 11:20 PM
As far as UK is considered, the less said, the better. It acts like US's sister concern and is being run along the same lines.
And if these posts are inflammatory, I plead guilty as charged because I believe in the concept of freedom of speech protected by the American Law (if I am not wrong).
Reply #23 Monday, January 13, 2003 11:46 PM

Reply #24 Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:08 AM
I admit that people suffered tremendous, unspeakable hardships under the Taliban, but do you think that the US presence has stopped the starvation deaths in that impoverished nation or that the US presence will stop the infighting between warlords in Afghanistan?
Reply #25 Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:14 AM
I'm not even sure why I'm bothering to respond to you anymore because you're just a rabid anti-USA everything. As the UN relief missions whether the US action has helped. The Taliban was preventing UN food aid to reach many parts of Afghanistan for political reasons. Now food is able to be delivered anywhere.
I wasn't aware that the US has been in "all the wars". Nor was I aware that the War of 1812, Civil War (to name two) were fought apparently on some sort of alternative plain of existence.

Reply #26 Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:28 AM
That is exactly what I am talking about, UNILATERALISM. The UN has sent its weapons inspectors and the decision of action against Iraq should be based on the UNSC decision. The US invokes UN charters as and when it likes, while blatantly ignoring its directives in many others.
And I was taking of all the wars after the 1940's. I apologise for not being specific, but hasn't the US, overtly or covertly, been a part of all of them? (And where the US has missed out, GB has stepped in to fill its shoes).
Don't you think that France, Russia have as many enemies?
Reply #27 Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:32 AM
No, you simply have no idea what you are talking about. You are not just slightly off on many of your facts and histories but utterly wrong with regards to the facts and histories in questions.
It is like debating with someone who is convinced that the moon landings never took place.

Reply #29 Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:41 AM
I hate to see these political disussions on a skin site.

Reply #30 Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:43 AM
Reply #31 Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:53 AM
I am not what you think I am, I do not belong to either side. Everything is not black and white. If u'd known me, u'd have seen me hating 'them' more than you do. But, I have been taught to think for myself, beyond the written word.
I was aggrieved by 911, I had an acquaintance in the Second Tower, but my heart bleeds equally for the innocent victims of the US war on Afghanistan. And I shudder to think what will happen if this is repeated in Iraq. Let them clean up their own mess, or let UNSC authorise action. Do not let the blood of innocent Iraqis on your hand for a few oil wells.
Reply #32 Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:56 AM
One of my most intense studies was of the holocaust…
War, death, destruction…it’s always going to be ugly, horrible and terrifying…but out of many wars there have been borne many freedoms and liberties to many people…
There are still primitive tribes in Africa and other continents where life and death are a constant tribal war and a struggle just to exist…
Are we better than those primitives? In many ways yes…because we communicate, we try to delineate peaceful talks between leaders and we try to establish fairness with peace talks etc. and even with our “BIG GUNS” we sure as heck don’t EVER want to “HAVE” to use them “EVER” because we KNOW BETTER. But give a 3rd world country a nuke…or a country/providence run by a dictator who can access one and you better duck and cover!
The USA is made up of 99.9% innocent citizens whom try to vote the best they can… Our leaders represent us but the difference between “US” and “THEM” is as a US citizen we DO have a choice… WE the PEOPLE speak with our vote… Some other less fortunate countries have no such rights… (Unless you call it a right to vote against your dictator if you don’t mind your head being lopped off for it).
Is the USA evil for being powerful and wealthy and strong? NO… If a country such as Iraq etc. had the same power the USA now…do you think they’d have diplomatic talks with the higher ups? Do you think they’d not force their ‘religion’ on people all over and not use their nukes as threats?
WHY is the USA so successful? Because we have FREEDOM…
I’ll probably get flamed for this but I don’t frickin’ care.
I’m sick of being called an “ugly American” just because we have does not mean we don’t care about the ‘have nots’ and doesn’t mean we want to fire off our weaponry at every given chance. Heck no! Nobody in their right mind wants to send their son/daughter off to fight a war if they can help it…except for the psycho wackos who want to sacrifice their children for some whacked out religious fairytale that was brainwashed into them since DAY ONE. What kind of choice is that?
Angel_Wings won't even go into how WOMEN and CHILDREN are treated in many of those countries! Talk about backasswards! >

Reply #33 Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:11 AM
Sexual freedom in our country was supressed by 'Medieval Western Morality'. We have had the nuclear option for 20+ years, but we have declared a no first-use policy. We share our foodstocks with countries that are poorer than us, break bread with our enemies.
We did make some mistakes by meddling in Sri Lanka's affairs in the early eighties but after burning our fingers once, never repeated it.
I do not use much gas, oil, CFC's as much as countries with tenth our population, but have to suffer the brunt of the climatic changes due to pollution.
And we respond to our leaders' decisions in the most blatant way possible, voting them in or out of power. We question them and analyse each and everyone of their decisions.
We have around 20 religions in our countries, 32 languages and over a 150 dialects.
There are occassional hiccups but we carry on, thank you.

Reply #34 Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:19 AM
Reply #35 Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:22 AM
Reply #36 Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:29 AM

If one wants peace...then why not be upstanding enough to try and keep it rather than stir the pot? You've only proven one thing to me...I am right in what I know...people like you almost NEVER waver from their own staid beliefs.
Peace to you nonetheless...

Reply #37 Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:55 AM
Reply #38 Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:00 AM
Reply #39 Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:52 AM
But as long as nothings found (weapons, rockets etc etc) I cannot see a single reason to start any kinda military actions.
I'll keep it at that, won't stir up more shit

Reply #40 Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:54 AM
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!







) true
Reply #21 Monday, January 13, 2003 11:07 PM
We as netizens need to rise above this now mundane concept of 'nationalism' cause the whole human race is one.