Windows 9 Is Coming. What Do You Want to See?

Thursday, August 21, 2014 by Island Dog | Discussion: Personal Computing

We are going to start to see the Windows 9 preview fairly soon according to various reports.  

Link: http://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-expected-to-announce-windows-9-on-september-30

We've heard the rumors of supposed features and user interface changes, so we can only wait and see what really to expect in Windows 9.

The real question is, what do you want to see changed or added in Windows 9?

 

Image via Neowin.

First Previous Page 2 of 5 Next Last
benmanns
Reply #21 Friday, August 22, 2014 9:15 PM

Would like to see an option for the USER to pick the kind of shell they want for the OS
so that both parties are happy windows7 users will have the startmenu back , while windows8 users can get the windows 8 style startmenu.
A one click solution would be nice to quickly switch between those styles.

Most important:
I would like to be not forced to upgrade windows8.1 to windows Threshold aka Windows10 because I don’t want to have the old/NEW startmenu10 back unless they have an option like mentioned above. Edit: turns out it has 


Would like to see some improvements on the personalisation also.
Aero and Blur -an extra option to choose to install that would be nice.
I hope they will make some improvements to Ad-Hoc .

A simpler safe mode boot function without activating F8 or checking boxes.( an extra option besides restart maybe ? ) something better than shift restarting...that’s all the rest was smooth in windows8 already cant wait to see what actually has been improved

GFireflyE
Reply #22 Friday, August 22, 2014 9:24 PM


Windows 7 with a proper file search and a static tool bar!

 

Wintercross
Reply #23 Saturday, August 23, 2014 1:24 AM

Oh really? I only just upgraded to windows 7......

bluedxca93
Reply #24 Saturday, August 23, 2014 8:35 AM

What i personally expect from win 9:

1) NTFS with real sym and hardlinks, no registry crap.

2) Global menu bar option  for applications insode panels  ( main menubar inside panel)

3) a grey theme design with nice borders for buttons

4) a launcher/start dock with opened apps on the right or bottom side.

5) a desktop icon / fences like  full screen start menu woth real icons

6) nicer and rounder  min max close buttons.

7) wine integration into the system:  https://www.winehq.org  ( yes the windows emulator schould also be integrated to win7 with a patch ( really necessary) !!!)

8) the new metro ui apps windowed with menu and toolbar.

If microsoft implement these 8 points in their systems i would buy it. if not win 7 is enough for me.

regards bluedxca93

 

Tattyhat
Reply #25 Saturday, August 23, 2014 10:44 AM

I want to see windows 7 with a 9 on it.  No more than that.  What I don't want is to smell windows 8 anywhere near it.

Uvah
Reply #26 Saturday, August 23, 2014 11:05 AM

^^^^What he said.

kona0197
Reply #27 Saturday, August 23, 2014 11:52 AM

bluedxca93

7) wine integration into the system: https://www.winehq.org ( yes the windows emulator schould also be integrated to win7 with a patch ( really necessary) !!!)

Why would you want to run a Windows emulator when you have the real thing?

bluedxca93
Reply #28 Saturday, August 23, 2014 1:46 PM

 

 hi,

  ah , yes i did forget dosbox integration as 9. point.  

Why? Test old/early 32 bit applications and some xp apps  on windows 7 and on slitaz with wine. If they run on wine they run normally more stable and faster. For these apps you would not need a VM normally .

And windows 64 bit does nearly break these apps runtime processes and you have to run most of them with administrator rights why ? that is the question here.   I need it especially for editing simple pdfs. ( on linux there program works and on windows it crashes often even if its a windows program.) .Photo Line a graphic editor  is really fast on wine, but so slow on windows.

 Also why doesn`t my norton  commander work well on windows 7 ? i did search for reasons but didn`t find one. 

i do find it frustrating that approx. only + 50 mb of installation disk cache could ensure backward compatibility. Microsoft does like to force the users to buy new programs, even if there is no reason. I hope that win9 would add a compatibility layer for 32 and 16 bit programs. They don`t even think that a system more compatible to older software could increase the sales of the Os in this case win9. No they try to invent new GUI what is a good thing, but don`t respect the fact that users like to run older software too. Its natural that they can`t support every old program , but they don`t  even try to make old simple apps runable without support. The win 7 xp 95 etc combatibility layer is only a fake for some registry matters and some what os am i using calls from these appplications. DAMN

 regards bluedxca93

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Snowman
Reply #29 Saturday, August 23, 2014 3:30 PM

bluedxca93

Also why doesn`t my norton commander work well on windows 7 ?

Norton Commander? NC's been "dead" for years......

I believe you mean Windows Commander - which by the way works just fine in any Windows version.

Sinkillr
Reply #30 Saturday, August 23, 2014 9:01 PM

MOAR TILES

bluedxca93
Reply #31 Sunday, August 24, 2014 6:12 AM

Snowman

Norton Commander? NC's been "dead" for years......

Not really its linux clone midnight commender is still alive on linux . Looks very much like nc5.exe......

 

oh i forgot  a gui  without back , forward and min max close title bar buttons would be great too [to increase usability )= . This amazing and great  idea was already implemented in win 8 somewhere )= ]  .

ElanaAhova
Reply #32 Monday, August 25, 2014 8:13 AM

A destop tha can easily be morphed into a win 7 formant.  Hate, hate, button being moved, changed, dialog boxes changing, and menus revamped.  OH, did I mention I hate relearning the basic use of the desktop cause MS shuffles all the elements around?

delve-miller
Reply #33 Monday, August 25, 2014 8:48 AM

will you guys bring back desktopX? saw it mentioned above..

Island Dog
Reply #34 Friday, August 29, 2014 5:51 PM

delve-miller

will you guys bring back desktopX? saw it mentioned above..

I'd say probably not.

the_Monk
Reply #35 Friday, August 29, 2014 7:42 PM

kona0197

Why would you want to run a Windows emulator when you have the real thing?

 

Correct me if I'm wrong please, but haven't you been a proponent of all things Linux and (as far as phones go) droid over windows whenever you get the chance?  I would think 'emulating windows' would be exactly up your alley no? 

Jafo
Reply #36 Friday, August 29, 2014 8:40 PM

the_Monk

Quoting kona0197,

Why would you want to run a Windows emulator when you have the real thing?



 

Correct me if I'm wrong please, but haven't you been a proponent of all things Linux and (as far as phones go) droid over windows whenever you get the chance?  I would think 'emulating windows' would be exactly up your alley no? 

 

That's probably only the stance taken on dates that are a prime number....at other times it'll be 'something else' ....

Seleuceia
Reply #37 Friday, August 29, 2014 8:43 PM

Dual booting windows is usually better for performance than running a virtual machine or emulation program...since the windows is typically for games, performance kind of matters....

kona0197
Reply #38 Saturday, August 30, 2014 12:10 AM

the_Monk

Correct me if I'm wrong please, but haven't you been a proponent of all things Linux and (as far as phones go) droid over windows whenever you get the chance? I would think 'emulating windows' would be exactly up your alley no?

Sure, I like to root for the little guy. I root for Linux and Android when I can, but here's something you probably did not know. I could never use Linux as my main OS, and in all of the time I have been a member here I have used Windows.

I have my reasons why I could never use Linux everyday, wrote a blog article about it. I just think MicroSoft has gotten a bit to big and taken Windows in a direction not many people like.

DARCA1213
Reply #39 Saturday, August 30, 2014 12:53 AM

Windows 7 2.0

but likely they will make a harder to use not as controllable OS with stuff that was free that we must now pay for.

And I didn't know SD could redo windows 8 to look and be like windows 7! So I could press the Microsoft button and be sent to the good old desk top again vs the tiles when playing galciv3???!!! Someone tell me more about this?!???!?

 

DARCA

Jafo
Reply #40 Saturday, August 30, 2014 1:52 AM

DARCA1213

And I didn't know SD could redo windows 8 to look and be like windows 7! So I could press the Microsoft button and be sent to the good old desk top again vs the tiles when playing galciv3???!!! Someone tell me more about this?!???!?

Darca.... you're posting from Stardock's GalCiv II website forum.... whereas others [like me] are posting from Stardock's WinCUSTOMIZE website forum - they're interlinked [and with others too].

Post OS2, Stardock turned its attention to MS Windows [last millennium] and has been closely connected with MS ever since - designing ways to Improve the Windows Experience [GUI].

Pop over and have a look ...

www.wincustomize.com

Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

  • Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
  • Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
  • Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
  • It's simple, and FREE!



web-wc01