Hmmmm...
Tuesday, November 26, 2002 by Delicious | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
Seems there is a law in the town I live that prohibits smokers from lighting up within 25 feet of an entrance of a building.
Reply #2 Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:20 PM
I quit smoking but I think anti-smoke persecution is getting absurd.
Yet, they won't ban cars (1000 times more polluting and harmful) from 25 feet of the building, will they?
I heard of a town in the US that outlawed smoking in the town completely. Even in your own home. Don't know the name of the town, I don't even know if it's true. Probably not, but it will get there.
What IS true is a story where a woman got sued for smoking in her own apartment, when a asthmatic child that lived in the apartment under hers died. Very sad for the kid, but heck, the woman was in her own apartment. OK, sue the building owner for bad ventilation, but for crying out loud, give me a break. Or actually, give smokers a break.
Reply #3 Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:32 PM
Reply #4 Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:36 PM
But, there might be cases where that law makes sense. For example, offices and places of employment often frown upon having a gathering of smokers outside their door. I smoke, but I can totally understand that. On the other hand, if it's a public building, and that 25 foot mark is on public property, I think I'd have to test the law.Reply #5 Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:44 PM
i dunno though. it doesn't seem particularly fair to herd a group together to light up, but it does make it easier for me to breathe...
Reply #6 Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:47 PM
Reply #7 Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:50 PM
The anti smoking campaign should be directed towards an anti greed campaign instead.
As someone once said, "It's all nickels and dimes, Arthur"
Reply #8 Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:01 PM
Reply #9 Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:02 PM

Being a spectator at a race meeting is one thing, but to be 'on your toes', concentrating on cars, drivers and car numbers, as they wizz by at 260 clicks [and more] and be able to tell if the smoke is from a deflating tyre or an engine whose ups and downs are about to go 'sideways', or, did Schumi REALLY deliberately nerf Hill and win the championship [he didn't] and who DOES belong to that little lump of carbon fibre on race-line and has anyone hit it yet, and where is the lead car and have the 'blues' been shown to those being lapped and why is that twit sitting in the tree over the track and did 12 pass 3 under yellows and where ARE the bloody numbers on a Williams anyway and........

Reply #10 Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:09 PM

Reply #11 Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:18 PM
one might aswell be inside. Having recently quite smoking myself I fully understand the addiction, and I always respect others health and would leave to a place I would not bother others... 
Reply #12 Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:08 AM
Wom I roll my own too
Oh you mean tobacco 
Reply #13 Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:51 AM
Call me paranoid, but the problem is that cigarette companies are actually pharmacutical companies that use cigarettes as a carrier instead of pills. I think moderate use of tobacco has never harmed anyone, but when it is chemically and genetically engineered...
As for the topic at hand the only time I am pissy about smoking is when children are present.
Reply #14 Wednesday, November 27, 2002 4:34 AM
Reply #15 Wednesday, November 27, 2002 10:37 AM
As for your building question, our office building (in Dallas, TX) made everybody go out back. Couldn't smoke anywhere else around or in the building. The building and the surrounding structures were laid out such that, when the winter winds started blowing, the structures would funnel the wind right through our smoking area. Felt like an arctic blast.

Reply #16 Wednesday, November 27, 2002 10:51 AM
Smoking indoors has been banned where I work. Not too uncommon I don't think. So smokers have taken to gathering outside the doors to the buildings. It can get cold in Canada so they want to indulge, yet stay warm. Problem is, they block the doors so you can't get in or out without being rude - they simply will not make way. I don't give a damn about the smoking, it's their inconsideration that bugs me. Whether or not it's a reaction to the indoor ban or not.
Now the employer is looking at banning smoking on campus altogether. This should create even more animosity. Great!

Reply #17 Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:53 PM
http://www.smokesearch.com
Very reliable, excellent prices.
Reply #18 Wednesday, November 27, 2002 2:38 PM
By the way, so the the land of the free does not tax me to death this is where I get my smokes.
http://www.yesmoke.com/index.php

Reply #19 Thursday, November 28, 2002 2:49 AM

Reply #20 Thursday, November 28, 2002 3:55 AM
Oi, how about a law requiring smokers to take a bath before entering a room with other people in it?
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!







Reply #1 Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:16 PM