New toy coming out..
Tuesday, November 12, 2002 by Frogboy | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
http://draginol.stardock.com/images/frog-nov02.jpg
 |
|
Page 4 of 4 | |
|
|---|
da_zman20
Reply #67 Sunday, November 17, 2002 12:03 PM
Reply #67 Sunday, November 17, 2002 12:03 PM
I just want to say that im not a big fan of macintosh, so I don't really get it... but if they actually incorporated those features of the drag and drop, and the icon effects, one could make the most kick a$$ object bar theme ever. Same goes for desktop x if they put these features into destop x then desktop x would be the most awesome creation ever (well not that it already isn't, besides the integrated circuit- without either we wouldn't be here today 
) but think of the possibilites... and with those features implemented into those programs we wouldn't have to download any new programs, just the updates... 
) but think of the possibilites... and with those features implemented into those programs we wouldn't have to download any new programs, just the updates... 
DarkFlame178
Reply #69 Monday, November 18, 2002 12:36 AM
Reply #69 Monday, November 18, 2002 12:36 AM
Just wondering, is it gonna come out this year or what?!?
I can't wait!!
I can't wait!!
SkinneRyan
Reply #70 Monday, November 18, 2002 6:17 AM
Reply #70 Monday, November 18, 2002 6:17 AM
9 times?
Damn. That beats my 8. It's a pity I couldn't see it. Oh well
Anyway. From now on, when referring to windows 98 or ME, you must ALL (too bad if you're not reading this, you can find out from everyone else) use the \ to separate them, instead of /
Is that clear? SkinneRyan tries an evil glare but fails badly and ends up laughing at his own stupidity.
SkinneRyan thinks "hmmm, I wonder how many people will actually listen to me."
SkinneRyan decides it dosen't matter and returns to his labratory where he can make an evil clone race where everyone is living in a dictatorship as far as using slashes and talking about windows versions is concerned.
Damn. That beats my 8. It's a pity I couldn't see it. Oh well
Anyway. From now on, when referring to windows 98 or ME, you must ALL (too bad if you're not reading this, you can find out from everyone else) use the \ to separate them, instead of /
Is that clear? SkinneRyan tries an evil glare but fails badly and ends up laughing at his own stupidity.
SkinneRyan thinks "hmmm, I wonder how many people will actually listen to me."
SkinneRyan decides it dosen't matter and returns to his labratory where he can make an evil clone race where everyone is living in a dictatorship as far as using slashes and talking about windows versions is concerned.
Carlitus
Reply #72 Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:24 AM
Reply #72 Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:24 AM
Hi Frogboy and all wincustomizers!
You said: it can use icon and png's files. This sounds good (the .png option), but i have some questions:
-The .ico files will have different sizes (from 16x16 to .... 128x128 maximum on XP). I think that OdjectDock will change the graphic (ex. for a maximization at 58x58 it will use the 64x64 size, or at 128x128 will use 64x64 too if it is the maximum size included on the ico file) via software routines.
-It is needed some different sizes for the .png files? Ok, don't shoot me, it's very knowed: NO. I assume that a 128x128 size it's right for all reductions. Some software reductions used on dock apps don't make correctly the reductions from 128x128 png (the best on this task is Yzdock, more than OSX dock!). WELL: only a .png file it's needed, so i think: How Stardock/Wincustomize will make available .png files for using with ObjectDock? I know that it's not convenient for Stardock to create a new 'Icon general section', because it's contrary to IconPackages; but the 'Graphic section is hidden by deffault, and it's intended to be a general sharing of graphic resources section... this is not the right section for .png. and .ico files distribution!
-A section with only .png files is contrary to Stardock's skinning way: make availabe packages with enhanced skins that can be used only with their software. PNG is free... how Stardock/Wincustomize will assimilate a section for png files?
Thanks
You said: it can use icon and png's files. This sounds good (the .png option), but i have some questions:
-The .ico files will have different sizes (from 16x16 to .... 128x128 maximum on XP). I think that OdjectDock will change the graphic (ex. for a maximization at 58x58 it will use the 64x64 size, or at 128x128 will use 64x64 too if it is the maximum size included on the ico file) via software routines.
-It is needed some different sizes for the .png files? Ok, don't shoot me, it's very knowed: NO. I assume that a 128x128 size it's right for all reductions. Some software reductions used on dock apps don't make correctly the reductions from 128x128 png (the best on this task is Yzdock, more than OSX dock!). WELL: only a .png file it's needed, so i think: How Stardock/Wincustomize will make available .png files for using with ObjectDock? I know that it's not convenient for Stardock to create a new 'Icon general section', because it's contrary to IconPackages; but the 'Graphic section is hidden by deffault, and it's intended to be a general sharing of graphic resources section... this is not the right section for .png. and .ico files distribution!
-A section with only .png files is contrary to Stardock's skinning way: make availabe packages with enhanced skins that can be used only with their software. PNG is free... how Stardock/Wincustomize will assimilate a section for png files?
Thanks
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
|
|
Page 4 of 4 | |
|
|---|
Reply #61 Friday, November 15, 2002 3:16 AM