Is it easier to skin Winamp3 over Winamp2?

Monday, August 19, 2002 by joetheblow | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk

Has anybody tried to skin Winamp3? is it pretty easy once you get the idea or is Winamp2 easier?
werewolf
Reply #1 Monday, August 19, 2002 3:14 PM
wa3 is all xml, like windows media player. I did several wmp skins once, it's not a horrible experience , but it's not all that easy either.

Powered by SkinBrowser!
treetog
Reply #2 Monday, August 19, 2002 3:54 PM
I didn't tried it yet, but I bet it is harder, today, I can make a winamp 2 skin with my eyes closed and am pretty sure that I cannot make a wa 3 skin.
bakerstreet
Reply #3 Monday, August 19, 2002 4:03 PM
Winamp 3 is harder to skin, i.e. you actually have to work at it, but it is actually easier to make a *nice* skin. The problem with Winamp 2.x was that it was hard to skin it *well*, but it was easy to skin, especially with skin generators. What you ended up with was a ton of half-ass skins that were cranked out in ten seconds, burying the small minority of good work. Winamp 2 was very confiing and difficult to make anything very 'new', due to its static components.

Now with Winamp 3, you have freeform skinning, potent scripting, and even the Wasabi SDK to mess with. So while you will actually have to work to skin it (which will be new to 90% of Winamp skinners), you will have a much easier time making spectacular looking skins.

bakerstreet
Reply #4 Monday, August 19, 2002 4:06 PM
p.s. Treetog is in the upper end of the other 10%...

Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

  • Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
  • Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
  • Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
  • It's simple, and FREE!



web-wc01