How do you define 'Acceptible' Porn ?

Saturday, November 24, 2001 by thecat2000 | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk

I am still frustrated about is the Still Questionable Logonui's on BoomGames.com. I say they are (That some) are Pornographic, and is unacceptible to have them available for download where Minors can easily Access them.

Basically I think that(they)the ones that are Unacceptible should be Removed.

Or is this just me ? am I the only one that cares whether they can do this or not !

Check the place out and judge for yourself

http://www.boomgames.com
First Previous Page 2 of 2 Next Last
T-Man
Reply #21 Monday, November 26, 2001 9:48 AM
Craeonics - 'Nah, parents should just keep an eye on their kids and not let the law do that for them.'

Yes parents should keep an eye on their children as much as they can. But in reality its not always possible. (And if you think it is then you live in a fantasy land ).

Anyway, I'm not asking the Law to enfore it. I am asking the website to voluntarily rate their site via the standards that have been put in place so that someone who chooses to filter sites, that are rated to have adult content, can do so.
paxx
Reply #22 Monday, November 26, 2001 10:10 AM
I am much more disturbed by the amount of gore and violence in certain wallpapers, than I am by showing a woman in a bikini. But for some reason, no one would even think of rating these as adult content...
paxx
Reply #23 Monday, November 26, 2001 10:12 AM
I think it was Jack Nickolson who, talking about movie ratings, once said someting like "Kiss a breast and the movie is rated PG, but cut it off with a chainsaw and it will be rated G."
Disturbing but true.
davad70
Reply #24 Monday, November 26, 2001 10:13 AM
Good point paxx....didn't think about that.
craeonics
Reply #25 Monday, November 26, 2001 11:29 AM
That just proves things. Sex is taboo, violence is not.

T-man: What standards? I don't feel much for rating sites at all.

Hmm, there was more, but it slipped...
Jafo
Reply #26 Monday, November 26, 2001 4:22 PM
Walls have been 'moderated' here for violence-related imagery....some of the Sept 11 walls didn't see light of day...not 'just' because they sucked as walls, but also for insensitive imagery.
I failed to see the appeal of a photo-montage of victims jumping from towers as a valid wallpaper subject.

I will always consider violence a greater justification for censorship than sex and/or nudity....
Orion
Reply #27 Monday, November 26, 2001 4:40 PM
After checking out the Logon Screens...I have only one comment: thecat2000 needs to lighten up.

Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

  • Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
  • Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
  • Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
  • It's simple, and FREE!



web-wc01