Rip Patrol
Tuesday, November 6, 2001 by davad70 | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
Ok, I'm feeling like I'm on rip patrol this week, but in checking out visual styles for XP, I'm coming across all sorts of interesting items. Yesterday I found WC member's walls posted somewhere with no credit given. And today.......Alexandrie's Preluna skin sliced and diced into a visual style @ http://www.peakpeak.com/~nicks/themes.html There may some other interesting items there also. There's no contact info, but here's where the link came from http://www.neowin.net/bboard/showthread.php?s=2b515212848513d1fdea3d8a47da7ecb&threadid=4243
 |
|
Page 4 of 5 | |
|
|---|
GrymmWolf
Reply #62 Saturday, November 10, 2001 10:38 AM
Reply #62 Saturday, November 10, 2001 10:38 AM
Aww c'mon people don't we have to deal with enough crap? Why keep compounding things?Call it "Porting" or whatever you wish but the problem seems to be more than a concern over ripping. First it is possible as you all know that several themes/skins are similar and this is due to the vast amounts of themes/skins available and the fact that with so many people skinnin, it is enevitable that many similarities will occur. Second, if I don't have/use WB but I really like the look of a theme/skin, as long as credit for the inspiration or "Ported from" acknowledgement for the artist's actual work itself is given what's the problem?? Many of you old-timers have been skinnin for years and several of you have "ported" themes/skins from eFX,and others, as well as Enlightenment styles to improve or at the very least take ownership of your machine. There are enough problems why add more?? Hell, I am a newbie to skinnin but I know what I like and if I like a style I'll use it or a variation of it,I mean you gotta start somewhere and if I have to use someone's theme/skin as a base and tailor it to my tastes then that's what I'm going to do. Of course I'll give credit to the original author's great work naturally.
Firestorm
Reply #63 Saturday, November 10, 2001 11:56 AM
Reply #63 Saturday, November 10, 2001 11:56 AM
Grymm, haven't the skinners' rights to protect their work been explained throughly enough?
Sorry, but the "why make trouble?" ideology doesn't fly with me. Protecting one's property is not "making trouble."
Sorry, but the "why make trouble?" ideology doesn't fly with me. Protecting one's property is not "making trouble."
GrymmWolf
Reply #64 Saturday, November 10, 2001 12:55 PM
Reply #64 Saturday, November 10, 2001 12:55 PM
I do believe in the rights of the skinner to protect their work. I never ment to give the impression of a "why make trouble?" ideology and if that is how it is taken I do apologize for that. What I am getting at is that it's hard enough nowadays to NOT create a skin/theme that bears similarities to others out there without having to worry about being flamed for it.
Now, I know there are some people who intentionally rip stuff and try to pass it off as their own, well, we know the truth.Is it really that hard for people to e-mail an artist to ask for permission?? I have done so in the past and noone has refused. I also give credit via a 3KB text file, to whomever was the originator/artist of what I modify AFTER iI get permission. Hell I've even gone as far as requesting imput from the artist long before I post whatever I've done.
Co-Operation in our community I believe, is so very important.
Its not hard, just look at how long it takes to create some of these fantastic works and how much you've put into them and remember to ask first, and to give credit where its due.
Now, I know there are some people who intentionally rip stuff and try to pass it off as their own, well, we know the truth.Is it really that hard for people to e-mail an artist to ask for permission?? I have done so in the past and noone has refused. I also give credit via a 3KB text file, to whomever was the originator/artist of what I modify AFTER iI get permission. Hell I've even gone as far as requesting imput from the artist long before I post whatever I've done.
Co-Operation in our community I believe, is so very important.
Its not hard, just look at how long it takes to create some of these fantastic works and how much you've put into them and remember to ask first, and to give credit where its due.
neodescis
Reply #65 Saturday, November 10, 2001 1:57 PM
Reply #65 Saturday, November 10, 2001 1:57 PM
Jafo - I have no idea what "on-top" buttons even are, but it does skin roll-up buttons. It can also skin track ars (sliders), the logoff buttons, and much more (I can come up with more examples if you want).
T-Man - you are right, StyleXP doesn't actually skin XP, but by that token, neither does WindowBlinds. It merely translates the .UIS format into something the XP skinning engine can understand.
T-Man - you are right, StyleXP doesn't actually skin XP, but by that token, neither does WindowBlinds. It merely translates the .UIS format into something the XP skinning engine can understand.
Istari
Reply #66 Saturday, November 10, 2001 4:47 PM
Reply #66 Saturday, November 10, 2001 4:47 PM
neo, there are no roll-ups in msstyles. I've had a year to look at msstyles now. It's a UIS1 type skin format. The only buttons support by msstyles are min,max,close and help. And they didn't execute on much of the code. You can't put buttons on the left even though the format says you're supposed to be able to.
The story for msstyles gets worse though because time is on Windowblinds side. You say how it will skin more apps eventually. Good but right now it don't skin 99% of the apps I run cept for the title bar. WindowBlinds does. By the time theme aware apps show up, WB will do mouse overs on radio buttons and sliders and any other obscure controls.
msstyles is a relic that is embraced by newbies to the skinning world. The only thing it has going for it is that it's bundled with XP and some people like me are willing to crack their systems to give them a try. But they are too limited for most WB users to go to.
The story for msstyles gets worse though because time is on Windowblinds side. You say how it will skin more apps eventually. Good but right now it don't skin 99% of the apps I run cept for the title bar. WindowBlinds does. By the time theme aware apps show up, WB will do mouse overs on radio buttons and sliders and any other obscure controls.
msstyles is a relic that is embraced by newbies to the skinning world. The only thing it has going for it is that it's bundled with XP and some people like me are willing to crack their systems to give them a try. But they are too limited for most WB users to go to.
Jafo
Reply #67 Saturday, November 10, 2001 8:45 PM
Reply #67 Saturday, November 10, 2001 8:45 PM
neodescis...
As Tandis said, there are no roll-up buttons in a Ms style skin....it is an added function of Windowblinds.
I am not referring to the scroll buttons on a scrollbar.
Also, you might try inserting a clock display in your ms-style skinning, or how about winamp/coolplayer controls?...I'd love to see those being skinned in msstyles.....and not to mention the quick launch menu you can attach to each and every WB skin.
You really need to investigate the capacity of WB's capabilities before attempting to draw comparison.
Oh yes....'On-top' buttons can lock a window to stay visible on top of others, even if focus is moved from that window to another.....often referred to as Z-order.
Bit of research.....great for discussions of fact...
As Tandis said, there are no roll-up buttons in a Ms style skin....it is an added function of Windowblinds.
I am not referring to the scroll buttons on a scrollbar.
Also, you might try inserting a clock display in your ms-style skinning, or how about winamp/coolplayer controls?...I'd love to see those being skinned in msstyles.....and not to mention the quick launch menu you can attach to each and every WB skin.
You really need to investigate the capacity of WB's capabilities before attempting to draw comparison.
Oh yes....'On-top' buttons can lock a window to stay visible on top of others, even if focus is moved from that window to another.....often referred to as Z-order.
Bit of research.....great for discussions of fact...
Jafo
Reply #68 Saturday, November 10, 2001 8:52 PM
Reply #68 Saturday, November 10, 2001 8:52 PM
Grymm....just a reminder...
People are entirely at liberty to download ANY skin they wish, and modify it, use it, eat it [if they must], provided they then do NOT re-distribute it to a third party by any means what-so-ever.
That is when the laws of copyright are broken.
To circumvent these laws, all that is required is to contact the original author, requesting permission to re-distribute [upload] this derived work and on receipt of this permission, include a text file to that fact [eg, log of email consent].
The rule is....Permission first, upload second.
People are entirely at liberty to download ANY skin they wish, and modify it, use it, eat it [if they must], provided they then do NOT re-distribute it to a third party by any means what-so-ever.
That is when the laws of copyright are broken.
To circumvent these laws, all that is required is to contact the original author, requesting permission to re-distribute [upload] this derived work and on receipt of this permission, include a text file to that fact [eg, log of email consent].
The rule is....Permission first, upload second.
Emily
Reply #69 Saturday, November 10, 2001 9:22 PM
Reply #69 Saturday, November 10, 2001 9:22 PM
I don't have MSWinXP and I do not envision this computer ever having it. The home edition is $90 up from Windows ME and offers little that I can't already do.
Even with that factoid in play...if I had MSWinXP they haven't made a good case why I should sabotage my system DLLs. I find WindowBlinds 2.2, the version currently in use on this particular Windows ME machine, to be plenty fast. Their rantings about WB being slow ring of the hollowness of deceit. Because it's "free"? If you got your copy of MSWinXP free ok. But isnt' WindowBlinds free? You just pay the $20 if you want more features. $20. That is what grinds me. These people who, I conjecture, just paid at least $90 for MSWinXP cannot cough up $20 for something that does 10X as much?
As a mere end-luser, their arguments sound like those who think that I should switch from Adobe Photoshop to MS Paint.
The ripping is just the straw that breaks this camel's back. It becomes representative of a group of people...simply put...I would rather have nothing to do with. I am not empassioned quite enough to create an accout on these..websites...and it does seem to dawn on the people in focus that plagarism is a contemptible thing to do...but I have read the posts and it is doubtless who this..program..hack..patch whatever you deem to call it is being marketed..targeted..aimed at a very particular type of user.
My skins..which are private because they cause milk to sour..are an expression of myself. It would pain me to see someone gut my work. And I skin with Windowblinds because it lets me do anything I want. The choice words, what I want. Not what some "dude" in the cyberworld wants to exploit it for.
Even with that factoid in play...if I had MSWinXP they haven't made a good case why I should sabotage my system DLLs. I find WindowBlinds 2.2, the version currently in use on this particular Windows ME machine, to be plenty fast. Their rantings about WB being slow ring of the hollowness of deceit. Because it's "free"? If you got your copy of MSWinXP free ok. But isnt' WindowBlinds free? You just pay the $20 if you want more features. $20. That is what grinds me. These people who, I conjecture, just paid at least $90 for MSWinXP cannot cough up $20 for something that does 10X as much?
As a mere end-luser, their arguments sound like those who think that I should switch from Adobe Photoshop to MS Paint.
The ripping is just the straw that breaks this camel's back. It becomes representative of a group of people...simply put...I would rather have nothing to do with. I am not empassioned quite enough to create an accout on these..websites...and it does seem to dawn on the people in focus that plagarism is a contemptible thing to do...but I have read the posts and it is doubtless who this..program..hack..patch whatever you deem to call it is being marketed..targeted..aimed at a very particular type of user.
My skins..which are private because they cause milk to sour..are an expression of myself. It would pain me to see someone gut my work. And I skin with Windowblinds because it lets me do anything I want. The choice words, what I want. Not what some "dude" in the cyberworld wants to exploit it for.
paxx
Reply #71 Friday, November 16, 2001 9:44 AM
Reply #71 Friday, November 16, 2001 9:44 AM
Lets not go into religion wars here. It's totally beside the point. Some people like Windowblinds, and some people like Msstyle. But the fact remain: you can't base a skin on another author's skin without his permission, and even more so if permission was explicitly denied. I personnaly never refuse permission to anyone when I'm asked, but i do require to be asked in the first hand.
davad70
Reply #72 Saturday, November 17, 2001 7:20 PM
Reply #72 Saturday, November 17, 2001 7:20 PM
I hate to be the bearer of bad news...especially in regards to people ripping alexandrie, because I know she's tired of this, but there is a visual style posted at deviantART that appears to contain parts of alex's xp copper skin. http://www.deviantart.com/deviation.php?id=101252
I've posted a thread on devART's rip reporting board and requested and admin to look into it.
I've posted a thread on devART's rip reporting board and requested and admin to look into it.
davad70
Reply #75 Saturday, November 17, 2001 9:48 PM
Reply #75 Saturday, November 17, 2001 9:48 PM
it's gone from devART....nice to see the quick response from some mature and responsible admins (attila & jark).....one rip down...ummm...186 to go
Jafo
Reply #76 Saturday, November 17, 2001 11:11 PM
Reply #76 Saturday, November 17, 2001 11:11 PM
The established and respected skinning/art sites are not going to be a problem with rip control....gosh, even Nullsoft and Winamp.com are learning....[about time]...
The problem is always going to be new skin-related sites and new software that can be skinned/facilitates skinning.
StylesXP is by far the biggest potential problem for rip and copyright theft...
Maybe Alex should download the pre-luna styles rip, and upload it to their site as her own submission....then see exactly whose aurthorship is the more defensible.
When the ripped skin is removed, the issue is resolved...hehe...
The problem is always going to be new skin-related sites and new software that can be skinned/facilitates skinning.
StylesXP is by far the biggest potential problem for rip and copyright theft...
Maybe Alex should download the pre-luna styles rip, and upload it to their site as her own submission....then see exactly whose aurthorship is the more defensible.
When the ripped skin is removed, the issue is resolved...hehe...
Alexandrie
Reply #78 Saturday, November 17, 2001 11:14 PM
Reply #78 Saturday, November 17, 2001 11:14 PM
this neodescis will always find a new place to upload his rip. He always say oh excuse me I understand now, and what you know few days later? he found another place to post it.
davad70
Reply #79 Saturday, November 17, 2001 11:21 PM
Reply #79 Saturday, November 17, 2001 11:21 PM
Here's another one... http://www.themexp.org/view_wall.php?id=123 at least it's not alex this time.....it's adni...one of his walls.
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
|
|
Page 4 of 5 | |
|
|---|
Reply #61 Saturday, November 10, 2001 5:52 AM
You seem to have the right attitude with regards to seeking permission for using other people's work.
If the original skinners were approached properly before their work was used, whatever, it is quite possible that they would give permission for others to use/modify/port the skins.
Bad karma is generated, however, when the first anyone knows of a skin's use is its being plastered all over web sites with the 'copier' praising the efforts of the original author, but without the balance of fore-thought to actually seek permission first.
This correct process is called being polite, or having 'common decency'. It is not a difficult thing to do, and will often reap rewards....