Tile vs. Picture wallpaper
Monday, October 15, 2001 by eidylon | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
It would be really nice if there were a differentiation between the imaged wallpapers, like get posted now, and simple tiling pictures. The tiling ones are often very nice too, and dont drag the machine as badly as a full-screen image.
KenLin
Reply #2 Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:01 PM
Reply #2 Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:01 PM
I would like different sections myself.
sorry about the image, just testing
sorry about the image, just testing
XX
Reply #3 Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:09 PM
Reply #3 Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:09 PM
hm usually small size picture uses less resources but more cpu ( tiling pictures.. ) but not so much that full screen is better. but with nowdays computers its moot point.
currently im using a tiled legos wallpaper.
currently im using a tiled legos wallpaper.
MobiusCo
Reply #4 Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:36 PM
Reply #4 Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:36 PM
The only effect I have noticed on resources between full image and tiles is if you have the active desktop activated. Needless to say a definite resource hog. but other than that no noticabe difference even on an old P133 with 64megs of ram. One suggestion is put tile in the title, maybe that will draw specific attention to the tiles and allow for a search.
T-Man
Reply #5 Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:27 AM
Reply #5 Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:27 AM
There is a tiles category for the wallpapers but apparently noone is using it 
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
Reply #1 Monday, October 15, 2001 7:51 PM