Incredible!
Tuesday, June 14, 2011 by sydneysiders | Discussion: Community
Just incredible!!
throws it 'round like a toy...
The Piper Cub is actually specifically built to withstand an enormous amount of stress and has a very powerful engine.
This type of stunt is actually the most dangerous of air show acts, because of the low altitude at which the pilot performs.
Obviously, this pilot possesses unbelievable skill.
Viewing this content requires Silverlight. You can download Silverlight from http://www.silverlight.net/getstarted/silverlight3.
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!







Reply #21 Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:37 AM
Yes...both are propelled....and both by 'props'...hence the name. One MUST have 'thrust' that exceeds weight...the other does not NEED to.
Whether a plane has a wide body or not only affects 'glide ratio'. The best/worst 'glide ratio' in 'modern times' was the F104 .... some twit forgot to bother with wings at all [almost] so landing was inherently 'problematic' and why it's killed more of its own pilots than any plane has. The higher the wing-loading the more 'ballistic' the aircraft needs to be able to approach.
As for tail rotors to react against yaw [helicopters] or roll [aircraft] there are other solutions...vectored thrust is a recent preference....twin contra-rotating props was an earlier trend.
There ARE high-output contra aircraft that could quite possibly emulate the RC plane's efforts... no torque issues at all....