Talisman vs. Aston shootout
Wednesday, August 4, 2004 by Frogboy | Discussion: WinCustomize News
Aston and Talisman are replacement shells for Windows that compete head to head.
We are looking for advocates on both sides to put together reasonably detailed reviews of both products (pros and cons). The results we'll publish her on WinCustomize to give users an idea of what these shells are about.
In my view, both of them have reached that "maturity" level where they can be used by the non-hard core techie types. Comment on this thread with a link to a head to head and whether you want us to repost it (i.e. host) the review or just link to your head to head review.
Reply #2 Thursday, August 5, 2004 10:42 AM
Reply #3 Thursday, August 5, 2004 11:54 AM
http://shell-shocked.org/article.php?id=187
http://shell-shocked.org/article.php?id=183
Note that the author, Sacrat, is totally in love with Aston and despises Talisman, so it's not too balanced.
Reply #4 Friday, August 6, 2004 1:14 AM
I went ahead and spent the evening putting the latest versions through their paces.
IMO:
AstonShell is significantly better than the current Talisman.
Things going against Talisman:
- Felt sluggish
- Default themes buggy
- Style over substance (i.e. everything seems to be made to look pretty in a screenshot rather than actually work well)
- Poor system tray support
- Shell is less featured in core areas than Explorer (no drag and drop off menus, no taskbar grouping, etc.)
- Seems complicated to customize
Aston, by contrast had these points:
+ Felt snappy and fast
+ Seemed more polished
+ Seemed less system specific. The themes worked better on my system (taskbars didn't get messed up simply because I was running a lot of tasks)
+ Good system tray support
+ Theme chooser more straight forward
+ Easier to undertand
Going against Aston was:
- Felt less powerful than Explorer (no taskbar grouping and other things)
- Lost my desktop icons you don't really have a "Desktop" anymore as far as I could tell
- Goofy default directory c:\aston
- Includes a quasi-warez theme in there (Aqua theme compelte with Apple logo)
- Themes feel pretty static (like Talisman). No drag and drop anywhere.
Overall, Aston felt closest to being a professional level product. I don't think I'd use either one on a regular basis (I really don't like them taking away my desktop icons). The main reason though is that I'm used to Explorer so I'm more interested in extending that rather than replacing it.
But I can definitely see why Aston is preferred by many.
Reply #5 Friday, August 6, 2004 9:48 PM
Go to Aston Setup, the Desktop option, and click on "Get Explorer Icons". Voila! You have your icons back.
Of course, Aston offers .png support for icons, so just make my own anyway 
And I agree the skin you mentioned IS bad. There's plenty of GREAT ones though, available at DevArt or the AstonShell site.
EDIT: Oh, and I do believe they are working on the drag-and-drop thing for release within the next couple of versions.
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
Reply #1 Thursday, August 5, 2004 10:07 AM
The difference is that Aston is STABLE. Rock-solid stable. Aston has an easy learning curve, and has the benefit of having MANY plugins, which likewise are stable. Talisman, while it DOES do more (theoretically Aston can be made to do everything that Talisman does eye-candy wise), Talisman just does NOT appeal to me. Aston is what it needs to be, and does NOT try to impress you with things it does NOT need. Talisman is a good shell in looks ONLY. I bought a copy of Aston, and have never regretted it. Talisman leaves me feeling... well, kind of shallow.
My $.02