ObjectDock 2.0 Beta Feedback
Tuesday, March 30, 2010 by Island Dog | Discussion: ObjectDock
ObjectDock 2.0 beta went out today to customers who have pre-ordered. To keep some order in the forums, lets try to consolidate some of the feedback into this thread.
If you are posting an issue please be as descriptive as possible so we can address it if possible. Thanks for your feedback and enjoy!
March 30:
Beta Release
July 29th:
Beta v1.98 released
https://www.wincustomize.com/article/389526/
 |
|
Page 5 of 23 | |
|
|---|
Reply #82 Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:08 PM
Not everyone has screen recording software...
Reply #83 Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:08 PM
here is something funny about the missing flyout menus, there is still an option for it in additional advanced options
Reply #84 Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:09 PM
how do you back up your config? this option also seems to be missing, thats not good.
Reply #85 Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:20 PM
I just upgraded to the beta and noticed that the Run as Administrator option has gone when you right click an icon.
How can I get this back?
Im using Windows 7.
Reply #86 Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:22 PM
Guys,
Relax a bit. This is a BETA. How about reporting the bugs and not all the missing features you miss/want. 
Reply #87 Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:38 PM
Relax a bit. This is a BETA. How about reporting the bugs and not all the missing features you miss/want.
well, if we could get some sort of planned features list, then at least we would know it's coming.
Reply #88 Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:46 PM
Relax a bit. This is a BETA. How about reporting the bugs and not all the missing features you miss/want.
I agree.
Reply #89 Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:57 PM
Quoting runamonk, reply 86Guys,
Relax a bit. This is a BETA. How about reporting the bugs and not all the missing features you miss/want.
I agree.
isn't this topic for feedback? about what we think/want/issues?
Reply #90 Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:00 PM
what type of performance should we be getting? it doesn't perform very well from what i can tell, are there recommending specs? things we can do to improve performance? i don't see much.
Reply #91 Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:10 PM
But not too much. 
Reply #92 Wednesday, March 31, 2010 3:13 PM
Seems to be a pre alpha in fact 
Reply #93 Wednesday, March 31, 2010 3:20 PM
Relax a bit. This is a BETA
Seems to be a pre alpha in fact
You say that about EVERYTHING.
Reply #94 Wednesday, March 31, 2010 3:41 PM
Backing up topic:
Under Program settings->troubleshooting there is a button that takes you to the setting folder so you can HAND COPY the files elsewhere! WOOHOO! Serioulsy, this is a feature that will be 'upgraded' to an automatic backup in final release, right?
Reply #95 Wednesday, March 31, 2010 4:01 PM
Under Program settings->troubleshooting there is a button that takes you to the setting folder so you can HAND COPY the files elsewhere! WOOHOO!
Reply #96 Wednesday, March 31, 2010 5:14 PM
Check your memory setting under "program settings->performance settings" might help out. default was to use only 256 mb. Also some of the settings in that section have to do with speed of zooming and autohide.
Not sure how to measure performance...checked with FRAPS and am getting roughly 30 fps...but with a qcore machine, 64 bit Win7 and 4 gigs ram i would be upset if it was choking.
Reply #97 Wednesday, March 31, 2010 5:35 PM
Suggestions:
Tabbed Docks should have a minimum vertical size based on number of tabs. Currently, can vertically shrink dock to a point where tabs are difficult to use or access. (thought about screen wide, skinny drawers/tabs on tabs with larger number of icons 
)
Is there a way to change the fonts in the tabbed docks? I've tried changing the overall fonts in OD, as well as the fonts in Windows. neither had an effect on the tabbed docks.
Reply #98 Wednesday, March 31, 2010 6:05 PM
Quoting MichaelG04, reply 90what type of performance should we be getting? it doesn't perform very well from what i can tell, are there recommending specs? things we can do to improve performance? i don't see much.
Check your memory setting under "program settings->performance settings" might help out. default was to use only 256 mb. Also some of the settings in that section have to do with speed of zooming and autohide.
Not sure how to measure performance...checked with FRAPS and am getting roughly 30 fps...but with a qcore machine, 64 bit Win7 and 4 gigs ram i would be upset if it was choking.
my laptop is running windows 7 ultimate x86, 4gb of ram, core 2 duo t9500 2.6, and gf 8600m gt, but it runs like crapola, i even changed to only 256mb, lowest quality, looks and runs the same. maybe it's not actually chaning those options?
Reply #100 Wednesday, March 31, 2010 6:35 PM
Absolutely, would be great if we could specify a different font color for selected/not selected tabs.
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
|
|
Page 5 of 23 | |
|
|---|
Reply #81 Wednesday, March 31, 2010 12:36 PM
https://forums.wincustomize.com/378475
thx..but i saw that ine...10 times
stmg new...maybe...from u beta testers 