Decision on Web radio reached
Sunday, June 23, 2002 by DavidK | Discussion: WinCustomize News
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Internet music broadcasters and the recording industry, opponents in the debate over online music royalties, are both unhappy with a government decision setting rates for webcasters. The U.S. Copyright Office decided Thursday to charge webcasters 70 cents per song heard by 1,000 listeners, or half of what a government panel had proposed in February.
John Potter, executive director of the Digital Media Association, said the rate was still too high, but was an improvement over the earlier proposal.
The recording industry had sought even higher royalties to compensate artists and music labels for using their songs.
The 70-cent rate "simply does not reflect the fair market value of the music," said Cary Sherman, president of the Recording Industry Association of America.
If the decision is not changed, the first monthly royalty payments will be due in November. The fees are retroactive to 1998 and full payment of royalties from past years will be due in October.
Internet radio -- either simulcasts of traditional over-the-air radio or Internet-only stations streamed through the Internet to computers -- is becoming more popular as people get high-speed connections at home.
Webcasters said the rates initially proposed were too high and would cost larger Internet radio broadcasters hundreds of thousands of dollars annually, more than they get from advertising or listener contributions.
John Jeffrey, vice president of Live365 Inc., the largest Internet radio network, said even the lower rate may kill the fledgling industry. He said it will cost his cash-strapped company about $100,000 a month.
"This is a rate that still means the majority of independent webcasters will cease to operate," Jeffrey said.
Reply #2 Sunday, June 23, 2002 2:50 AM
Reply #3 Sunday, June 23, 2002 8:27 AM
i suppose someone will just create a new service which cant be classed as a radio broadcast, similar to alternatives appearing after napster
Reply #4 Sunday, June 23, 2002 11:21 AM
Are they actually crying because they can't make money for free anymore??
Reply #5 Sunday, June 23, 2002 12:06 PM
Reply #6 Sunday, June 23, 2002 12:09 PM
Reply #7 Sunday, June 23, 2002 12:51 PM
The potential of the internet is astounding in its ability to expand information and culture to every corner of the world. It can give anyone access to a global audience. I hate seeing any restrictions that try to keep cultural content from being available. When you force web-broadcasters off the net you are silencing more than just music, you prevent the sharing of ideas and inspiration that could ultimately serve to untie people in a cross-cultural awareness.
Reply #8 Sunday, June 23, 2002 1:12 PM
i used to be a dj. not only do radio station not have to pay the per play royalty, they don't have to pay it per capita. -that- requirement is just preposterous. the -only- reason it's in there is because it can be.. radio has no way of determining exactly how many listeners they have, but the net streamers do - so they use it against them. the rules should be the same for radio and net radio.
this is one rare case where the oh-so-popular-these-days phrase 'that isn't fair' actually applies perfectly.
Reply #9 Sunday, June 23, 2002 1:35 PM
but then again... breaking down nationalistic borders between cultures is a bit like un-tying the people...
Reply #11 Monday, June 24, 2002 8:38 AM
SomaFM already shut down... I imagine there won't be any internet stations left in 2 months. The reason is that, as migellito was saying, these royalties are hundreds of times higher than regular broadcast stations- as in a radio station with no commercials and 2000 listeners would have to pay $500 a day in royalties. Insane...
Reply #12 Monday, June 24, 2002 2:15 PM
Reply #13 Monday, June 24, 2002 4:05 PM
Records - Why pay to see someone live when you can buy the record and listen to it hundreds of times? Wrong!
Radio - Why buy a record when you can hear it for free on the radio? Wrong!
Cassette tapes - Why buy a record when you can tape a friends record? Wrong!
In every case record sales went up.
Yet they never realize the opportunity before them.
With such blunders of vision it is amazing they haven't folded up.
Reply #14 Monday, June 24, 2002 7:56 PM
Reply #15 Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:23 AM
Reply #16 Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:55 AM
I don't suppose it could be the fact that they ignore music and promote short term crap in the mainstream.
AAaaaaaargh. >
Thanks, I feel a little better now.
Reply #17 Friday, June 28, 2002 8:19 PM
I would think the same thing applies to music. Noone get popular by attacking popular services.
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!








Reply #1 Sunday, June 23, 2002 2:22 AM