Just release damn 2.0 already
Friday, January 1, 2010 by OhHayThere | Discussion: ObjectDock
Enough said. It's been how long now? 2 years? Either refund us money, or start working, because that's why you get paid!
Reply #82 Sunday, January 3, 2010 11:42 AM
good grief, incognito! we all get it! trust me, we get it. you're not happy with objectdock for some reason. for whatever reason(s) you're not happy, i don't give a damn. what i do give a damn about is being able to read a thread on this forum without having to see mutliple posts by you bitching about the same thing over and over again. come on, dude! you've made your displeasure known to the entire planet and no amount of bitching on your part is going to make the app get updated any faster. would we all like to see a new version of OD? yeah, we would. do you see me making hundreds of posts about the same damned thing in every thread created about OD? no, you do not. only you have that distinction. either grow up or shut up. do like hankers suggested and email or call stardock about it.
Reply #83 Sunday, January 3, 2010 12:07 PM
First of all, let me make something very clear: I obviously do not speak for Stardock, and the opinions stated here are just that: my own personal opinions. I have no 'inside sources' at Stardock and I'm just making educated guesses, which are based on my own experience in this business and on the 10 year old 'relationship' I have with them. This said:
You seem to forget that Jeff works for Stardock and that it is Stardock that tells Jeff what to work on next. Stardock's vision and direction might also not necessarily be the same as yours. All you care about right now is an update to ObjectDock, but perhaps Stardock is busy frying bigger fish at the moment? Everything takes time...
Companies normally have to diversify their portfolio of products, one of the reasons being that if one stops selling for any reason you still have others to keep the company afloat. That also means resources are sometimes spread thin, but it is a risk every company must take in order to fulfil their long term vision.
Err... Possibly? Companies are made of people. Some of them are key people, others not so much - size of the company also matters in that respect. Another reason why diversification is so important, as it makes a company less dependent on key people.
I remember a recent story about a company called LxLabs that sold and developed HyperVM, a very popular web based application used on thousands of servers worldwide. When Ligesh, the company's founder, committed suicide on 8 June, 2009, the company died with him. It can happen because in reality companies are not big faceless 'things': they're made of, and depend on, people - and life is full of surprises.
You're still thinking in terms of 'database' programmers, which are (and I don't want to hurt any feelings here) the rule rather than the exception. One goes to work somewhere else and another one immediately takes his place, with nearly no disruption to the company. Not so with specialized software such as this (and again I speak from experience, having been on both sides of the fence).
By this I'm not implying in any way (God forbid!) that we are 'better' programmers than anyone else, just that we specialized in this type of software and have many years of experience working on it.
Again, you're forgeting about the need companies have to diversify their products. Not every company has the (nearly) unlimited resources of a Microsoft or Google.
Bottom line is: you use what you have, things take time, and nobody can split themselves in two.
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!







Reply #81 Sunday, January 3, 2010 11:38 AM
There ya go again... sneaking in between posts again.
However, that's not my main gripe (and being this is a gripe thread... I'm entitled)
Anyhow, wots the big idea?? Just cos tha missus puts up a pic of me in a collar and tie, it don't mean you gotta go 'shop' it and portray me beating up on a poor defenseless "dead' horse. I mean, like it's not bad enough that my image has been tarnished with a collar and tie??? No, you gotta go put me in a situation that'll have the DAPPS (Dead Animal Persecution Prevention Society) breathing down my neck.
Well let me tell yer summat, if they come knocking at my door, I'm gonna level accusations that'll have MDPS (Madass Doctor Prevention Society) beating down your door. Yup, attributing you with the PhotoShopping of Mad Comics characters faces onto the heads of Playmate centerfolds oughta do the trick.