Centralized List of Ideas and Suggestions for The Forums

Just to Help Centralize Things

Wednesday, January 21, 2009 by DrJBHL | Discussion: Community

Many WC'ers have advanced ideas for The Forums and problems encountered using them. They're spread out all over the place. That's the reason I'm making this Post: To centralize things to make the job of others who want to make WC the best it can be easier.

 

Everyone is welcome. Have fun. I'll do my best to sift through it all and post it up here to try and save evryone's time (Zubaz's suggestion)

 

A. Make last post read work.. for everyone

B. 1. Return to top of page at bottom of each page.

    2. Clicking on Recent forum Activity take you to latest post not first page.

    3. Expanded smiley list.

    4, Separate section for Political discussions, Humor (including shopping shots) and personals.

    5. General section would be for general Stardock and WC realated conversations.

    6. Recent posts list either expanded to 20 listings, or separated into help related and non-help related subjects.

    7. Better search function.

C. 1. Polls.. everyone could create polls.

  2. Introduction of negative karma.

  3. Increased Firefox compatibility.

  4. Lower/shorter render times.

  5. Bann on using adult words

  6. Animated Gif avatars less than 100 kb

  7. Integration between WC main site and forums.....(sign on)

D. actually having the built-in browser spell checkers function in these post boxes.

E. I think rather than trying to implement more ideas for the forums...like birthdays etc...as done previously....best to try and get what we already have working.....or back to working....again.

F. 1. Fix the  "insert link" function. It currently works backwards. It should work as follows: Click the insert link, put in the                  url, it puts in the appropriate code with the url doubled as the name, which is highlighted so you can name it whatever you          wish. (any problems with this suggestion please ask bebi bulma for a better/fuller explanation).

  2. actually having the built-in browser spell checkers function in these post boxes.

G, 1.subscription emails for watch list) and other features that are totally broken/nonfunctioning (guestbook comment deletion, the photo albums) that those should be fixed before anything else gets added.


  2. make the smilies style='vertical-align:middle' like they were before.

  3. fix the Quote mechanism: attribution should work even for limited portions of posts/replies.

H. Please make the comment book 'remove comment' function work again.

I. I would like to see a timer perhaps. You have 2 minutes to edit your post . .and then it's locked.

J. There are times when you need to edit something after 2-5 min.

K. 1. uploading images directly into the post as opposed to calling on an external site to relay the image back. this would be            especially helpful in the help sections of the forums .

    2. [do something with the wiki to make it effective, it seems pretty barren on information/help.]

L.  1. Faster refresh rate for the forum pages to prevent mistimed replies.

    2. Fixing the "double post" problem.

M. 1. No changes to karma. Should remain positive incentive.

    2. Mod edit objectionable picture content.

N. No animated avatars. Forums not a video store.

O. 1. Several ideas for time limit to "edit" function: Range from 2-10 minutes from time of post.

    2. the time limit should be fairly long until they get around to putting a spell checker in the editor.

    3. Edit would only add new comment in the same box and require printed 'reason for edit' above the newer post and                     notfication in the thread that a post was changed.

    4. Karma should not be anonymous. Karma has become pointless.

    5. Karma is ok, it's meant to be taken lightly, and there's no need to kill the fun

    6. Karma is nothing but a novelty. It's FUN trying to get that karma up. Add negative Karma and the fun is gone, and with that it'll be entirely useless.

    7. Karma: It's kind of relative and for me it has had a positive effect.

P. 1. Edit function should last a few minutes. Original post/reply should remain along with it.

    2. Freezing the post after a short time, if someone wants to correct or change a thought, let them post another.

    3. Re the editing of comments....I'm totally against it. Posts [and threads] being altered for whatever 'agenda' is not                     acceptable. Whatever is decided, the number one demand is accountability....the thread comment must be tagged with             'edited by....'  publicly .... and ideally if that's the case the edit text should be linked [hidden] but visible for review                   by the Admins. I've always thought the height of bad manners was/is to edit a thread topic, etc AFTER several/many                 people have taken the time/effort to respond/comment.

Q. 1. The forums shouldn't parse any html whatsoever from the post box.

    2. Unless you are a member of a specific user class, your html isn't parsed, period.

    3. User posted html just wrecks havoc on the forums and should be completely ignored from parsing. It should all be plain             text (with the exception of the bbcode buttons in the editor). There just doesn't seem to be any checking for open tags,             which causes all the problems.

    4. I think 2-3 mins for the post locking. negative Karma is a bad idea.

    5. Several of the classic smilies do not match when posted...would be nice to have them tidied up...the sad goes to                       angry and the Yum goes to the big smile.

    6. Cross posting errors if two windows are open.

R. {1. Inaccurate time/date stamping keeping comments at the top of notes on Personal sites}

S. Fix the need for double sign in @ WC Home page then again @ Forums.

T. Subscribers still see ads.

 

 

First Previous Page 8 of 11 Next Last
wulfn1
Reply #141 Sunday, January 25, 2009 3:03 PM

lol thanks for thinking I was that intelligent!! I think it's called "old age" setting in... can't keep me threads straight anymore!

DrJBHL
Reply #142 Sunday, January 25, 2009 11:02 PM

Try an ..... iron  

PuterDudeJim
Reply #143 Monday, January 26, 2009 12:08 AM

lol thanks for thinking I was that intelligent!! I think it's called "old age" setting in... can't keep me threads straight anymore!

Hey Wulfie!  Haven't seen you around for a while, good seein ya!

Tailsgirl
Reply #144 Monday, January 26, 2009 12:09 AM

All I know is.. I've got that 'Miss Me Blind' song stuck in my head..   how did this end up about Fagboy George?

superman
Reply #145 Monday, January 26, 2009 4:06 AM

Negative karma is not a bad idea...

Dont go on its name 'negative', be affirmative and look at its postives..Thia will help to maintain discipline and also prevent use of abusive words...If you want to score from your good work, why not to lose for crossing your limits, The person who will be most at loss by implementing this is perhaps me, but still I welcome it as it will make  me more disciplined.... And if you dont want discipline thats other thing...You can impose certain limitations... like max 5 in a day etc...to prevent its abuse...

 

 

 

Bebi Bulma
Reply #146 Monday, January 26, 2009 4:18 AM

Karma as a form of "discipline" is a joke because as it is right now, it's totally useless. It serves no actual function other than who has the biggest fanclub, the same way the ratings works in the galleries. When they abolish the ratings they should toss out the karma while they're at it.

superman
Reply #147 Monday, January 26, 2009 4:27 AM

The fact that I dont repeat my statements twice and its a topic to be discussed by the website board are preventing me to restate..... And I dont want to say anything more.. Please leave me...

Tailsgirl
Reply #148 Monday, January 26, 2009 5:02 AM

Yep heman, Karma is ok, it's meant to be taken lightly, and there's no need to kill the fun.

Reguarding ratings, if you've spent a decent amount of time on the creative side of thing's, made something for others to view, or use.. then [to me anyway] their input [the raters] is valuable.. no system is foolproof, and it may not be 'spot-on', but at least those of us who have contributed, get to see, or get an idea in general, as to what others think of our work..  it's also 'incentive'.

mickeko
Reply #149 Monday, January 26, 2009 5:46 AM

Karma is nothing but a novelty. It's FUN trying to get that karma up. Add negative Karma and the fun is gone, and with that it'll be entirely useless. Why? Because just as is it is with positive karma, people will throw negative karma for the "wrong" reasons. That will just cause a negative attitude in the community.

Just take a look at giveaway of the day site. They have positive/negative voting on apps, and people vote things down just because they don't need it. It doesn't serve any purpose at all....

 

gmc2
Reply #150 Monday, January 26, 2009 6:32 AM

Bebi Bulma
Karma as a form of "discipline" is a joke because as it is right now, it's totally useless. It serves no actual function other than who has the biggest fanclub, the same way the ratings works in the galleries. When they abolish the ratings they should toss out the karma while they're at it.

I agree in a sense and sort of disagree. On one side of the coin I totally agree about the fanclub aspect. Why some have karma so high, for a little time as they have been here and for what little they actually contribute leaves me scrathcing my head. I give karma for help received and really good ideas.

on the other side of the coin (and this is about my experience), I, by nature, am cynical and can be caustic if I choose to do be. Since receiving karma I have attempted to tone down my abrasive behavior and be more a part of the community. I have even started looking at posts in my areas where I might help or provide an answer. This doesn't mean that I'm working on being perfect or that I won't rise to the occasion or that I'm seeking karma for my own self esteem. It's kind of relative and for me it has had a positive effect.

DrJBHL
Reply #151 Monday, January 26, 2009 6:46 AM

*note: summarized through here.

superman
Reply #152 Monday, January 26, 2009 1:34 PM

*denotes that values are approximate

Oll what about # 138.

Oh All these centralisations are centered around that karma...God knows ur fate.. karma

DrJBHL
Reply #153 Monday, January 26, 2009 2:51 PM

1. Please change the color of your * note in 152...to help me, superman.

2. #138: The date/time stamp was noted: see R. 1. {....}

    The rating system is off topic so it wasn't included...that's part of the Galleries not forums, and Frogboy has already dealt with that in      one of his 3 posts regarding WC.

superman
Reply #154 Monday, January 26, 2009 3:15 PM

I had to edit that post after 90 mins.. I was just going to sleep.

Should I remove that note? I have to go  to sleep...plz tell soon.

DrJBHL
Reply #155 Monday, January 26, 2009 3:54 PM

No, you did just fine,,,thank you very much for your help.

Tailsgirl
Reply #156 Monday, January 26, 2009 3:59 PM

That's a shame Doc, as one of the benefits of Subscription, is being able to rate skins, and since I don't download the skins available to Subscribers, all I can do, is rate, I hope they don't take all the personal stuff away from us.. I'd miss that feature, as inacurate as it may be.. sorry this isn't part of the list.. but I don't think it should be taken away from us.

superman
Reply #157 Monday, January 26, 2009 4:51 PM

There has not been a final decision yet..

DrJBHL
Reply #158 Monday, January 26, 2009 4:55 PM

I agree. The people should be heard, not just Mods. Their opinions of art and what pleases each of them is not more valid than ours.

Vox Populi for me.

Tailsgirl
Reply #159 Monday, January 26, 2009 5:00 PM

Yeah, I mean, are they definately removing this feature? as I've seen some work not rated very well on approval, and I think users should be able to rate [and as I said, so far, besides ad free browsing, rating is the only Subscriber feature I use and I enjoy it!] , as the opinion of just the Mods [no offense AT ALL to them] is only a handful of people, you know the saying.. majority rules. .. the opinion of many users is likely to be more accurate.

ZubaZ
Reply #160 Monday, January 26, 2009 8:27 PM

ratings have nothingto do with theforums . . but if you reread Brads post he discusses a different rating system.

Having said that, moderators don't work in a vacume.  We are a team with years of experience in the skinning world.  What might be good "art" is not always a good skin/wallpaper/etc.  There will always be a balalce of modertor moderation and community feedback when it comes to skins.

And, as always, if you are unhappy with a moderator decision you can address it with one of us and see what happens.

 

-sigh-

 

No one needs to get updset before anything happens

Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

  • Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
  • Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
  • Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
  • It's simple, and FREE!



web-wc01