Centralized List of Ideas and Suggestions for The Forums
Just to Help Centralize Things
Wednesday, January 21, 2009 by DrJBHL | Discussion: Community
Many WC'ers have advanced ideas for The Forums and problems encountered using them. They're spread out all over the place. That's the reason I'm making this Post: To centralize things to make the job of others who want to make WC the best it can be easier.
Everyone is welcome. Have fun. I'll do my best to sift through it all and post it up here to try and save evryone's time (Zubaz's suggestion)
A. Make last post read work.. for everyone
B. 1. Return to top of page at bottom of each page.
2. Clicking on Recent forum Activity take you to latest post not first page.
3. Expanded smiley list.
4, Separate section for Political discussions, Humor (including shopping shots) and personals.
5. General section would be for general Stardock and WC realated conversations.
6. Recent posts list either expanded to 20 listings, or separated into help related and non-help related subjects.
7. Better search function.
C. 1. Polls.. everyone could create polls.
2. Introduction of negative karma.
3. Increased Firefox compatibility.
4. Lower/shorter render times.
5. Bann on using adult words
6. Animated Gif avatars less than 100 kb
7. Integration between WC main site and forums.....(sign on)
D. actually having the built-in browser spell checkers function in these post boxes.
E. I think rather than trying to implement more ideas for the forums...like birthdays etc...as done previously....best to try and get what we already have working.....or back to working....again.
F. 1. Fix the "insert link" function. It currently works backwards. It should work as follows: Click the insert link, put in the url, it puts in the appropriate code with the url doubled as the name, which is highlighted so you can name it whatever you wish. (any problems with this suggestion please ask bebi bulma for a better/fuller explanation).
2. actually having the built-in browser spell checkers function in these post boxes.
G, 1.subscription emails for watch list) and other features that are totally broken/nonfunctioning (guestbook comment deletion, the photo albums) that those should be fixed before anything else gets added.
2. make the smilies style='vertical-align:middle' like they were before.
3. fix the Quote mechanism: attribution should work even for limited portions of posts/replies.
H. Please make the comment book 'remove comment' function work again.
I. I would like to see a timer perhaps. You have 2 minutes to edit your post . .and then it's locked.
J. There are times when you need to edit something after 2-5 min.
K. 1. uploading images directly into the post as opposed to calling on an external site to relay the image back. this would be especially helpful in the help sections of the forums .
2. [do something with the wiki to make it effective, it seems pretty barren on information/help.]
L. 1. Faster refresh rate for the forum pages to prevent mistimed replies.
2. Fixing the "double post" problem.
M. 1. No changes to karma. Should remain positive incentive.
2. Mod edit objectionable picture content.
N. No animated avatars. Forums not a video store.
O. 1. Several ideas for time limit to "edit" function: Range from 2-10 minutes from time of post.
2. the time limit should be fairly long until they get around to putting a spell checker in the editor.
3. Edit would only add new comment in the same box and require printed 'reason for edit' above the newer post and notfication in the thread that a post was changed.
4. Karma should not be anonymous. Karma has become pointless.
5. Karma is ok, it's meant to be taken lightly, and there's no need to kill the fun
6. Karma is nothing but a novelty. It's FUN trying to get that karma up. Add negative Karma and the fun is gone, and with that it'll be entirely useless.
7. Karma: It's kind of relative and for me it has had a positive effect.
P. 1. Edit function should last a few minutes. Original post/reply should remain along with it.
2. Freezing the post after a short time, if someone wants to correct or change a thought, let them post another.
3. Re the editing of comments....I'm totally against it. Posts [and threads] being altered for whatever 'agenda' is not acceptable. Whatever is decided, the number one demand is accountability....the thread comment must be tagged with 'edited by....' publicly .... and ideally if that's the case the edit text should be linked [hidden] but visible for review by the Admins. I've always thought the height of bad manners was/is to edit a thread topic, etc AFTER several/many people have taken the time/effort to respond/comment.
Q. 1. The forums shouldn't parse any html whatsoever from the post box.
2. Unless you are a member of a specific user class, your html isn't parsed, period.
3. User posted html just wrecks havoc on the forums and should be completely ignored from parsing. It should all be plain text (with the exception of the bbcode buttons in the editor). There just doesn't seem to be any checking for open tags, which causes all the problems.
4. I think 2-3 mins for the post locking. negative Karma is a bad idea.
5. Several of the classic smilies do not match when posted...would be nice to have them tidied up...the sad goes to angry and the Yum goes to the big smile.
6. Cross posting errors if two windows are open.
R. {1. Inaccurate time/date stamping keeping comments at the top of notes on Personal sites}
S. Fix the need for double sign in @ WC Home page then again @ Forums.
T. Subscribers still see ads.
Reply #182 Tuesday, January 27, 2009 6:22 PM
that's where the comment box comes in....
the star rating is not particularly accurate...and when all's said and done... you rate with your download......there have been things I've liked and downloaded at 2 stars....and things I've disliked at 4/5....basically....download what you like...and leave contructive comments/praise/critique.....
The star method isn't great. Maybe a system with "Creativity/Originality: (enter 1-10) Technical Skill: (enter 1-10)" type box would be good.
trouble is....your general user is not particularly equipped to rate technical skill......and creativity/originality is often in the eye of the beholder...
This is true also. Can't argue with you Syd. I just know I don't wish to abdicate my own feeling about a skin I feel something about. The comment box is good too. I'd get rid of the smileys there, but that's just my opinion.
What do you mean?
![]()
Reply #183 Tuesday, January 27, 2009 6:34 PM
Reply #184 Tuesday, January 27, 2009 6:37 PM
Doc, it's just that a post, isn't a topic, on most forums, a topic is a topic, but here it's called a post.. and a post here is a reply [hehehe are you confused yet?
] yet a reply is usually referred to as a post![]()
Zu.. I wasn't complaining............![]()
Reply #185 Tuesday, January 27, 2009 7:25 PM
I understood, TG...was just funnin'...ta make you smile and giggle a little. ![]()
Reply #186 Tuesday, January 27, 2009 7:31 PM
I thought this whole thing was a thread and each bit (like this) was a post. A topic is an area of discussion.
Or am I old fashioned... ![]()
Reply #187 Tuesday, January 27, 2009 7:45 PM
As a new member here, I think it would be great if the search worked on the forums, I would love to be able to search for answers before I post questions.
Reply #188 Tuesday, January 27, 2009 7:50 PM
No, you're right Fuzzy, these parts are the posts, and the thread is the topic... that's actually what I was saying. ![]()
Reply #189 Tuesday, January 27, 2009 8:33 PM
Zu.. I wasn't complaining............
Reply #191 Tuesday, January 27, 2009 10:23 PM
I guess I'am old fashioned also, cuss I agree with Fuzzy. Its a thread and this is a post on that thread.
Reply #192 Tuesday, January 27, 2009 10:26 PM
Me as well.
Reply #193 Wednesday, January 28, 2009 2:54 AM
You can reply to a post, but here, a reply becomes a post itself. For example, if I was replying to your post, this I am writing now would be attached to post # 190 rather than a new post # 193 ![]()
Reply #194 Wednesday, January 28, 2009 5:17 AM
When it's first written, it's a post. The replies and original content together become a thread. The replies are posted on the thread.
Ok, Doc you can have your Post.......eh thread.......back! ![]()
Reply #195 Wednesday, January 28, 2009 5:27 AM
What if someone makes a topic, aka thread, then replies to it, posts, no wait.. the post is the thread, or topic, the reply is the post.. nope.. the post is the reply, no that's the topic!.. what if the person quotes his own thread/post/topic, and replies to that quote, or post, topic, thread, what does that mean?... WHO's ON FIRST!![]()
Reply #197 Wednesday, January 28, 2009 6:16 AM
Doc, I'm a frayed knot [afraid not
..long joke hehe]
Edit.. Doc, that link froze me for 10 minutes, it was dancing?
no rabbits?![]()
Reply #199 Wednesday, January 28, 2009 6:26 AM
Thanks Doc
, I'm back in form, my old happy , slightly crazy, self again.![]()
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!









Reply #181 Tuesday, January 27, 2009 4:17 PM
Very true, but manners wouldn't go astray either.
and people shouldn't be put in the position of having to develop.. a 'thicker skin'
...anyway, as ID said.. it's about forum improvements now, and we can't seem to get back on track.

Doc, I don't know if I mentioned this before or not..[in this topic anyway hehe I did in another] they need to change 'Post' to 'Topic' and 'Reply' to 'Post', on the main forum page, hehe it can be confusing.