Fair & Balanced Reporting : David Brooks Considers Sarah Palin Fatal Cancer of the Republican Party

Palin Represents ‘Fatal Cancer’ to GOP, Top Conservative Pundit Says

Wednesday, October 8, 2008 by AtlanticCanadianScot | Discussion: Internet

FrankenbarbieConservative New York Times columnist David Brooks, who has expressed doubts about Sarah Palin's readiness to serve as vice president, said this week the Alaska governor represents a fatal cancer to the Republican Party

From

(CNN) – Conservative New York Times columnist David Brooks, who has expressed doubts about Sarah Palin’s readiness to serve as vice president, said this week the Alaska governor “represents a fatal cancer to the Republican Party.”

Brooks praised Palin’s debate performance and called her a natural political talent, but told a New York audience Monday that “experience matters”: “Do I think she’s ready to be president or vice president? No, she’s not even close to that,” he said.

“…Reagan had an immense faith in the power of ideas,” he also said, in remarks first reported by the Huffington Post. “But there has been a counter, more populist tradition, which is not only to scorn liberal ideas, but to scorn ideas entirely. And I'm afraid that Sarah Palin has those prejudices. I think President Bush has those prejudices."

 

Other prominent conservatives, including George Will and David Frum, have publicly questioned Palin's readiness to be vice president. Prominent conservative columnist Kathleen Parker, an early supporter, said late last month that recent interviews have shown the Alaska governor is "out of her league" and should leave the GOP presidential ticket for the good of the party.

Brooks himself has also written skeptically about Palin. "Sarah Palin has many virtues," he wrote in a recent column. "If you wanted someone to destroy a corrupt establishment, she'd be your woman. But the constructive act of governance is another matter. She has not been engaged in national issues, does not have a repertoire of historic patterns and, like President Bush, she seems to compensate for her lack of experience with brashness and excessive decisiveness."

First Previous Page 18 of 18 Next Last
Excalpius
Reply #341 Thursday, October 16, 2008 12:57 AM

Sniff...thanks seansky! 

Excalpius
Reply #342 Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:03 AM

Xiandi

You do realize that part of that administration is a Democrat controlled congress.

Inaccurate.  The Democrats only gained the majority of the HOUSE of Representatives in 2006.  Without control of the Senate and/or a veto-proof majority in both, the Democratically controlled House is and was unable to override Bush's veto and veto threats.  This has meant the control has been in a stalemate for 2 years, with the Democrats unable to end the war in Iraq, etc. and the White House stopped in its tracks to a large extend by Democratic filibustering.

So, nothing could get done.  It's part of the checks and balances of our system of government and why the Senate and House are structured differently from each other and the Presidency as far as term limits, voting cycles, and responsibilities.

It's American Civics 101 and it helps A LOT in separating the spin from the truth.

 

Excalpius
Reply #343 Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:08 AM

She will not be a superpower for long if Obama is elected. http://macsmind.com/wordpress/2008/06/08/obama-wants-to-protect-america/

I watched the video in its entirely and saw nothing presented that would relegate our economic or military superpower status.  In fact, many of these proposals are in complete agreement with Republican initiatives and some of McCain's own votes over the years.

starkers
Reply #344 Thursday, October 16, 2008 5:27 AM

She will not be a superpower for long if Obama is elected.

What downright and utter bollocks!  America will no longer be a superpower if McCain/Palin get elected.  Osama bin Laden and his cohorts will descend upon her with a vengeance with such an obvious airhead as Palin at the helm.  I mean, why would they respect her when the majority of her own countrymen/women don't cos she doesn't know which magazine she reads... er, looks at the pretty pictures in  Like whoa, even her teleprompter has pictures on it cos she finds it easier to understand.

Well you didn't seriously think McCain would actually be there??  Apparently he likes fishing, so he's gonna take time out to fish with the other grumpy old men.

Oh, that's right, you wouldn't have heard!!  Yeah, various Repubs discussed MacCain's bumbling senility and felt it was a liability to the Party, so he was going to announce his retirement from politics after his final debate with Barack Obama last night.... trouble was, he forgot to while he was forgetting not to attack/assassinate Obama's character... and how to debate real issues.

 

WebGizmos
Reply #345 Thursday, October 16, 2008 6:31 AM

Don't worry...GW has everything under control!

 

 

NightTrainthedark
Reply #346 Thursday, October 16, 2008 7:18 AM

We baled out AIG so the execs could go on a luxurious spending spree.

It's ridiculous that taking from the poor to give to the rich is ok but taking from the rich to give to the poor is socialism.

Everyone talks change yet we are a confused country that fears change.    

TheMasterBaron
Reply #347 Thursday, October 16, 2008 10:16 AM

Everyone talks change yet we are a confused country that fears change.

To this point, I was looking for bumper stickers this week as I was driver to and from work (I live in Colorado and have to trek 45 minutes to work).  It funny because I have see many Obama/Biden stickers but no McCain/Palin stickers.  However, I have seen a few NObama stickers.  It gives the impressions that people are more afraid of Obama than they like McCain/Palin.

 

AtlanticCanadianScot
Reply #348 Thursday, October 16, 2008 12:22 PM

Sniff...thanks seansky!
...hey Excalpius..your efforts in this thread have brought much needed clarity as well as your point of view as a citizen who has known what the American dream actually was and what levels it could be taken to with the right government, collective mind set & environment & also serve as a reminder as to why the Republican Neo-Con agenda leaves people cold;the acknowlegement of a contributor of your magnitude was certainly warranted & I would have been remiss to have not done so....

AtlanticCanadianScot
Reply #349 Thursday, October 16, 2008 12:44 PM

The 'Joe the Plumber Debate'

Are The Republicans Better Off Losing This Election?....

Did anyone notice that John McCain didn't take his dive until the markets tanked?

 

Mike Huckabee, clown politician-turned-Fox News Channel host, recently joked, "We may have the first election in history where it's the winner who demands the recount!" The bad news for Barack Obama is that his victory margin will probably be too big for that.

Before the worst of the fiscal meltdown, I cautioned against rosy scenarios. Now it looks like the polls that are most generous to Obama may be the most correct—the Rasmussen and Gallup daily tracking polls that have him at or above 50 percent.

Rasmussen, with a 5-point lead for Obama (50 percent-45 percent) may not look as good for the Democrat as Gallup's 10-point lead (51 percent-41 percent). But actually, it's fine: with a smaller number of undecided voters, McCain has less chance to catch up.

Rasmussen uses controversial "robo-calling" (automated polling by voicemail), which generally cuts down on the number of undecideds—more than a few McCain supporters are embarrassed to tell live operators how they are voting. Party lines are so deeply etched that McCain probably has a floor of 46 percent. But that still leaves room for a substantial Obama win.

Unfortunately, that means Obama is screwed. It's obvious he'll take office with his hands tied behind his back thanks to the war, the deficit, and the Crash of '08. Even worse, he'll have heavy majorities of Democrats in both the House and Senate.

Full responsibility plus zero options equals political disaster for Obama and the Democrats.

Each time the Democrats have held both the presidency and strong congressional majorities, it's been a trainwreck. Bill Clinton barely got Democrats on the Hill to pass his economic program—which produced the prosperity we're all so nostalgic for this week—and they killed his health care plan. After two years, Clinton was rewarded with a Republican majority for the rest of his term, leading ultimately to the public release of a government-sponsored report on his sexual practices. The first president whose semen stains became federal property—this is what happens when Democrats control all branches of government.

Clinton, however, thrived with a Republican Congress around to share responsibility for risky decisions like the Kosovo war. (The impeachment unpleasantness aside, of course.)

It took Democrats 12 years to recover from Jimmy Carter's presidency. If only the genial Gerald Ford had won the very tight 1976 election, instead of Carter and a Democratic Congress, the Republicans would have held power during those malaise years of energy shortage, Middle East turmoil, stagflation and unemployment. Ford and his chief of staff, the young Richard B. Cheney, would have been blamed. The country would never have turned to Ronald Reagan. Dan Quayle would be quietly managing his family's small newspapers, and George W. Bush would never have given up drinking.

To be sure, the Democrats have caught some lucky breaks over the years. In the summer of 1988, Michael Dukakis was leading George Bush Sr. by 17 points, but wisely took a dive. The recession of 1991-92, which cost Bush his reelection, was way overdue.

And if John Kerry had been elected four years ago, he'd be running for reelection right now, as the markets unravel. We'd probably elect John McCain to clean up the mess. Kerry saw this coming, and fed the Republicans a steady diet of flip-flops, gaffes, and soporific oratory. He was able to watch the grim events of the past four years from the comfort of the Senate cloakroom.

Obama can hope for a Rev. Wright book tour, a Tony Rezko plea deal, or even those Diebold machines to let him off the hook. But it looks like it'll be no use: the Democrats are stuck with this cleanup. Look for a rough 2010 election cycle.

http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2008/10/republicans-lose-election.php

starkers
Reply #350 Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:37 PM

Is that a roll of toilet paper representing US currency ob George Dubbya's desk?????

Now ya know why the economy went down the shit-shute

AtlanticCanadianScot
Reply #351 Thursday, October 16, 2008 2:46 PM

David Frum

You Know It's Bad For the Conservatives When David Frum Throws in the Towel....

Halfway through the debate last night, a link to a The Week article popped up in our box, where David Frum, that crazy Maddow-baiter (and the guy who confused Keith Olbermann with a comedy writer at 23/6) switches tactics midstream and starts bemoaning the fall of the old guard.

Which means, halfway through Grandpa's stories about Joe Plumber and abortion litmus tests, even the most steadfast soldiers of the Republican party start to question their ability to win the war:

Trouble is, by founding his campaign on a full supply-side message, McCain denied himself the opportunity to say anything new. Worse, because that message originally took shape as a (correct) response to the problems of the 1970’s, McCain’s attempt to dust it off and reuse it as a response to the very different problems of the 2010’s only made him look more out of date.

That’s not a failure of campaign tactics. It’s not even a failure of strategy. It’s a failure of the Republican Party and conservative movement to adapt to the times.

Very soon, this election will be over. Then Republicans and conservatives will confront a much harder question: How long will this adaptation take? It took Democrats 12 years to understand and accept their defeat in 1980. Surely we can be faster learners?

First David Brooks, then Christopher Buckley, Bill Kristol, and now smugosaurus Frum. Tomorrow, is it too much to hope for a public apology from Bill O'Reilly?

http://www.jossip.com/you-know-its-bad-for-the-conservatives-when-david-frum-throws-in-the-towel-20081016/#more-36369

Elsius Saint
Reply #352 Thursday, October 16, 2008 3:18 PM

POOR LIBERTY

 

It hurts me deeply! If she can do this to our beautiful and sexy liberty

I wonder what she would do to America then.

 

I guess we all can say out loud, "God Bless America", our home sweet home  

WebGizmos
Reply #353 Thursday, October 16, 2008 4:08 PM

Is that a roll of toilet paper representing US currency ob George Dubbya's desk?????

Now ya know why the economy went down the shit-shute

Yeah...He pretty much used a sledgehammer to finish the job his cohorts started. (did ya notice the toilet tank and lever behind him?)

DrJBHL
Reply #354 Thursday, October 16, 2008 4:10 PM

I so can't wait for this nonsense to end.

I.D. and Brad: There was no need to abuse Snidely. You can support McCain without becoming him.

Excalapius and Starkers: A bloke could learn to lurv you two guys!

Seanskycanadian: You're officially a member of the crew (Starkers: Your vote is requested, Cap'n!).

Dr.J.

DrJBHL
Reply #355 Thursday, October 16, 2008 4:11 PM

WebGizmos

Is that a roll of toilet paper representing US currency ob George Dubbya's desk?????

Now ya know why the economy went down the shit-shute
Yeah...He pretty much used a sledgehammer to finish the job his cohorts started. (did ya notice the toilet tank and lever behind him?)

You might say he's flush with success.

Yet another "Mission Accomplished". My hero.

starkers
Reply #356 Thursday, October 16, 2008 11:53 PM

(did ya notice the toilet tank and lever behind him?)

Yeah, I missed that... I was captivated by the blank 'is anybody home' look on George Dubbya's face.  Well not so much captivated by his vacant look, more bemused as to how come this twit became the President of the United States.

Seanskycanadian: You're officially a member of the crew (Starkers: Your vote is requested, Cap'n!).

Aye, Seanskycanadian be welcome aboard t' join tha crew... he be an 'onerable bloke wot'll bring 'e's experience n' wisdom t' tha noble profeshun o' piratin' threads.

You might say he's flush with success.

Not flush enough for my liking.... he could at least hop in the bowl and go down with the excessive crap he generates.

Draginol
Reply #357 Thursday, October 16, 2008 11:58 PM

Dr J0622


I so can't wait for this nonsense to end.
I.D. and Brad: There was no need to abuse Snidely. You can support McCain without becoming him.
Excalapius and Starkers: A bloke could learn to lurv you two guys!
Seanskycanadian: You're officially a member of the crew (Starkers: Your vote is requested, Cap'n!).
Dr.J.

Excuse me? Where did I abuse anyone?

From what you just wrote above, it would seem your definition of abuse are those who don't share your political views. Besides, I don't support McCain.

Well, my tolerance for obnoxiousness has reached its end.  Be thankful that I'm not as intolerant as some of you in this thread.

If there is one thing that is most definitely "ignorant" (or at least unwise) it is patronizing or antagonizing the guy who owns the place you're talking in.  

 

Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

  • Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
  • Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
  • Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
  • It's simple, and FREE!



web-wc01