Fair & Balanced Reporting : David Brooks Considers Sarah Palin Fatal Cancer of the Republican Party
Palin Represents ‘Fatal Cancer’ to GOP, Top Conservative Pundit Says
Wednesday, October 8, 2008 by AtlanticCanadianScot | Discussion: Internet
Conservative New York Times columnist David Brooks, who has expressed doubts about Sarah Palin's readiness to serve as vice president, said this week the Alaska governor represents a fatal cancer to the Republican Party
From CNN Associate Political Editor Rebecca Sinderbrand
(CNN) – Conservative New York Times columnist David Brooks, who has expressed doubts about Sarah Palin’s readiness to serve as vice president, said this week the Alaska governor “represents a fatal cancer to the Republican Party.”
Brooks praised Palin’s debate performance and called her a natural political talent, but told a New York audience Monday that “experience matters”: “Do I think she’s ready to be president or vice president? No, she’s not even close to that,” he said.
“…Reagan had an immense faith in the power of ideas,” he also said, in remarks first reported by the Huffington Post. “But there has been a counter, more populist tradition, which is not only to scorn liberal ideas, but to scorn ideas entirely. And I'm afraid that Sarah Palin has those prejudices. I think President Bush has those prejudices."
Other prominent conservatives, including George Will and David Frum, have publicly questioned Palin's readiness to be vice president. Prominent conservative columnist Kathleen Parker, an early supporter, said late last month that recent interviews have shown the Alaska governor is "out of her league" and should leave the GOP presidential ticket for the good of the party.
Brooks himself has also written skeptically about Palin. "Sarah Palin has many virtues," he wrote in a recent column. "If you wanted someone to destroy a corrupt establishment, she'd be your woman. But the constructive act of governance is another matter. She has not been engaged in national issues, does not have a repertoire of historic patterns and, like President Bush, she seems to compensate for her lack of experience with brashness and excessive decisiveness."
Reply #322 Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:30 PM
Seanskycanadian:
The Republican propensity for living in an "alternate reality" (dream world) should never be underestimated.
Reply #323 Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:41 PM
LOL. Yes, your personal interpretation defines universal truth.
Fact check me on my bios of those two candidates. Go ahead. Go for it. I double dog dare ya!
Fact check your cherry picking of events of bios along with your biased interpretation? Please.
Reply #324 Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:45 PM
Thinking Obama would be a terrible President does not make someone ignorant or evil or stupid or racist.
Neither does it mean they are not.
Usually, this is an issue of ideology rather than ignorance. This allows people to buy into the most ridiculous accusations as long as there is one mentally ill person with a blog (right or left wing) preaching the conspiracy theory gospel.
However!
If someone believes Obama is a Muslim, they are IGNORANT of the facts as vetted by countless organizations for years.
If they believe he is a secret terrorist because he met one, they are IGNORANT of the very nature of politics, especially CHICAGO politics.
I don't think anyone in this thread has suggested that Obama is a Muslim or a terrorist.
I think there is evidence that at one time, Obama was raised as a Muslim when in Indonesia but I don't think it really matters any way.
Obama certainly has spent time with and associated with people who intensely dislike the United States. Ayres, for instance, is an unrepentant terrorist in my opinion. My issue with Obama in that area is how many people who just despise this country happen to support him or be involved with him.
This is where you let your personal views interefere with facts.
So who decides whether a given fact is relevant or not? You? Ignorance is not knowing something. You expand the definition to include those who have opinions you don't agree with.
Reply #326 Wednesday, October 15, 2008 3:57 PM
It makes you wonder how Obama would do without the liberals group-think mentality. I really love how people disregard 0bama's association with Ayers, and all these other anti-American "friends" of his, just by saying we all have "crazy uncles". That is the most ridiculous thing I have read.
Why would 0bama start his political career with a known radical and domestic terrorist? Why?
Reply #327 Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:03 PM
Reply #328 Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:07 PM
Quoting Dr J0622, reply 22Seanskycanadian:
The Republican propensity for living in an "alternate reality" (dream world) should never be underestimated.
I think just the opposite is true so it's all good.
Alternatively speaking, that is. ![]()
Reply #329 Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:14 PM
LOL....I.D.: Obama was 8 years old when that crap happened....It was such a non starter that Republicans said, "Is that the best you've got?".
In fact, it wasn't the best. McCain hasn't got "a best". He just has a pretty little winking attack parrott from mooseland who doesn't know Government from family, and is so clueless she isn't even allowed to be interviewed by herself, nor does she even know how to answer the question, "What magazines do you read?".
Polar bears have more brains (and ethics).
What a hopeless, pathetic ticket.
Reply #330 Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:19 PM
It's pretty obvious you know nothing about Ayers, otherwise you wouldn't be copying Obama talking points.
What a hopeless, pathetic ticket.
I agree, the 0Bama-Biden ticket is pathetic.
Reply #331 Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:10 PM
Excalpius -
You know next to nothing about me. Typical of folks like you to make it personal rather than about facts or issues. Very lame.
Reply #332 Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:52 PM
a refresher for ya Daiwa...
Reply #333 Wednesday, October 15, 2008 9:45 PM
Figures you wouldn't get the pun, Seansky. And you're the cleverboots? I'm to bow at your altar of wisdom, I guess. But I think I'll pass, thank you.
Reply #334 Wednesday, October 15, 2008 11:23 PM
The "association" smear is precisely that. It is fallacious and self-delusional to claim otherwise.
And I was raised Canadian until the age of 4 when I moved to America and became an American citizen by choice. Do you think for a MINUTE I remember anything about being "Canadian"? Do you think it has any affect on my politics or religious beliefs, etc. today At 4 years old?! Puh-lease.
And I've worked directly with three recent Presidents. That doesn't mean I'm senile or helped bring down the Berlin Wall, a spy who's responsible for Noriega AND Saddam, or would cheat on my wife, now does it?! ![]()
So who decides whether a given fact is relevant or not? You? Ignorance is not knowing something. You expand the definition to include those who have opinions you don't agree with.
No, I expand the definition of ignorance to those who bury their heads in the sand so as to remain willfully ignorant of the facts just to keep from shaking up their personal ideology. There is uneducated and then there is ignorant and then there is willfully ignorant.
Ah, NOW we get to the meat of it. Are you one of those "America, love it or leave it" people who the corrupt count on when they sling that "your flag pin isn't as big as my flag pin" hooey?
In an effort to clear up the misrepresentation of those of us who love America enough to want to see her get back on track after being whored out to the highest bidder for the past 8 years, here is a list of what I don't think we believe in:
We don't believe we should put American soldiers' lives at risk by premptively invading already declawed countries just to slide a trillion dollars of graft to our cronies.
We don't believe that the Constitution is an anachronistic document that should be actively isubverted.
We don't believe that our systems and balances are quaint and should be ignored by an unchecked executive branch.
We don't believe in ceding the moral high ground our predecessors fought 200 years to establish.
We don't believe that you are guilty until proven innocent. re: the (un)Patriot Act.
We don't believe that our private lives are any of your goddamn business. re: recording US citizen phone calls.
We don't believe that this country has the "god given right" to treat the rest of humanity (and the planet for that matter) like shit, just because we were in the right place at the right time for the industrial age.
And we can't believe we are the only remaining industrialized nation in the world that still lets these HMO scumbags (thanks Nixon! ahem) kill our own citizens in the interest of more pennies to the stockholders.
We don't believe in torture.
We don't despise this country. We despise the LEADERSHIP of OUR country - what Bush's administration has done to OUR nation and we're holding anyone associated with it, including McCain, accountable.
I love this country. I, like you, Brad, and like Obama, have had more than my fair share of the American Dream. And I see that dream dying all over this nation. It is simply not possible for some people to get out of the holes they've been squeezed into by the policies of this administration. And I know that no amount of individual charity can counter the machines that are deliberately bleeding the poor and middle class of this country dry.
So, I think this GREAT nation can do better. And I love America enough to do whatever it takes to see her stay a superpower and remain the most blessed nation on the Earth.
And we aren't going to be able to make that happen with more decades of "me first" and "I need to save another 1% on my taxes" thinking.
"The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." -- Thomas Jefferson
In fact, nowhere do the founding fathers say anything even remotely like "America, love it or leave it."
Reply #335 Wednesday, October 15, 2008 11:39 PM
Because when he met him it was DECADES later and they were both on an Annenberg CHARITABLE foundation together, along with other Chicago Republicans and Democrats alike.
Because we don't hold McCain accountable for decades of personal affiliations with Saddam Hussein (when he was our paid for ally against Iran), Osama bin Laden (when he was our paid for ally againt Russia), and Noriega (when he was running drugs for Bush Sr.'s CIA through Panama).
In other words, we understand the definition and nature of politics enough to know this is an utter non-issue.
Reply #336 Wednesday, October 15, 2008 11:54 PM
re Reply #334...that is a tour de force of a response Excalpius;clearly, you truly are a learned & great man who has walked amoungst the greatest minds & achievers of your nation - my gawd...that 'from the heart' listicle would have been worthy in tonight's "Joe the Plumber" debate...and you are correct in stating that what your American electorate is hungering for & needful of, is what you so passionately articulated...not what the 'base' was high fiving Senator McCain for....
Reply #337 Thursday, October 16, 2008 12:11 AM
You, like Obama, are good at vague generalizations and demagoguery. Some sweeping rhetoric, without actually making the case for it. Simply a claim of belief.
Reply #338 Thursday, October 16, 2008 12:20 AM
Does no one realize that this election has basically de-evolved into a scene from Napoleon Dynamite?
"Vote for me, and all of your wildest dreams will come true."
Pedro '08
Reply #339 Thursday, October 16, 2008 12:56 AM
I guess we can take it from your comment that this is your FIRST election then? ![]()
Reply #340 Thursday, October 16, 2008 12:56 AM
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!







Reply #321 Wednesday, October 15, 2008 2:42 PM
thx for the shout out Excalpius & Doc...yeah..thank gawd for the internet having the reach to counter the Machevelian maneuverings of the well documented Republican election school of nasty;Rove, Atwater's disciple, mentor to McCain current svengali, Steve Smidt & Nicole Wallace - thus maybe the schitzoid seizures & fits of the McCain campaign can be explained that way, or to quote my Portugese grandfather 'if ya can't dazzle them with brilliance, bafffle them with bullshit'....