What Has Happened To DesktopX?
Lack of Activity
Friday, May 9, 2008 by PuterDudeJim | Discussion: DesktopX
Reply #2 Friday, May 9, 2008 7:42 PM
I like Making them too.
I have vista and all meters and task bars ect... Do not work so well with Vista.
So therefor I'm not so eager to make a Desktop theme.
Reply #3 Friday, May 9, 2008 7:44 PM
Put "American Idol" on my desktop and I'll hurl, I swear!
Reply #4 Friday, May 9, 2008 7:47 PM
Of the 21 you have submitted 8. Of the last 8 put in the library, 7 are yours. Downloads of the themes seem to be good so there are people or appears to be people using DX Themes. There are some pretty good skinners in the 21 themes that made it into the main library like gef, HAPTORK, Tiggz, BigDogBigFeet and bilbo1930 to mention a few.
I'm just a user of the skins here in the Gallery Libraries so can't really speak for the skinners. Maybe the skinners who were making themes feel they did what they could with what was available. What could be added in DX functions the might cause folks to start skinning again?
Or maybe someone needs to put together a DX Theme contest to help highlight it as a desktop customizing tool. That might work.
EDIT: Damn I took too long typing this. (
Reply #5 Friday, May 9, 2008 7:56 PM
I feel that it has something to do with the varying screen resolutions with many of the older themes being exclusively set. Loads of people are migrating to widescreen formats, which to me translates to very few utilizing DX themes because most of the older themes were made in lower resolutions.
And the users who are still within the standard format has to ponder and negotiate certain themes because of this and most novice users don't want to be bothered or don't have the know-how.
1024 X 768? 1280 X 1024? Resolution Independent? What the hell is that? People don't have to go through that with any other application.
Personally I love DesktopX and have actually created my own theme a while back!
But you are correct about the diminished interest in DesktopX Themes PuterDudeJim, I'm feeling that way too!
Sadly, I guess people are happy enough with DX widgets and objects.
Cp
Reply #6 Friday, May 9, 2008 7:59 PM
You nailed it right on the nose.
Reply #7 Friday, May 9, 2008 8:21 PM
Oh yes they do. Litestep has 'suffered' from resolution dependency since day one. Coding themes to genuinely be res-independent can be quite difficult, particularly with the more 'adventurous' themes. Wallpaper-specific themes [designed for one wall ONLY] were even worse....![]()
Reply #8 Friday, May 9, 2008 9:36 PM
A good DesktopX theme is resolution independent.
After all, the games that use it have UI that are resolution independent.
Reply #9 Friday, May 9, 2008 10:21 PM
Reply #10 Friday, May 9, 2008 10:46 PM
Wizard1956 now that sounds like a great plan.
Reply #11 Saturday, May 10, 2008 10:58 AM
Maybe as OS's start to have more customization built-in people are less into doing it themselves?
Personally, other than simply getting busy with other things, the biggest reason I periodically stop working with DX is that so many themes just don't work/don't meet my needs. I think I went through every theme going back to 2004 the other night and only found about 5 that were anything like I was looking for. Of those, 2 made my computer pretty much explode. And, I suppose if you are frustrated by just using the themes, you probably aren't going to want to go even further into it by making your own. (Though personally, I just find that a challenge to do better).
As far as making themes myself... well, I've never actually finished one. Lol. My problem is being a perfectionist. I don't wanna just throw something together that's been done 20 times. So I end up needing to get into major scripting, which I don't know how to do, and so I give up - thinking I'll get back to it later. By the time I do, there's a whole new version of DX out and I have to figure out new stuff, etc.
(Actually the theme I'm working on right now has minimal scripting so hopefully I'll have it done soon - keep an eye out.
RR
Reply #12 Saturday, May 10, 2008 11:31 AM
Reply #13 Saturday, May 10, 2008 11:34 AM
Reply #14 Saturday, May 10, 2008 11:43 AM
Reply #15 Saturday, May 10, 2008 11:48 AM
Also there are just so many skins out there for the standalone programs that I change my desktop every couple of days usually.
Reply #16 Saturday, May 10, 2008 12:03 PM
Reply #17 Saturday, May 10, 2008 12:49 PM
Then Litestep is another case in point Jafo and the same could be said about ObjectBar2. Most newbs will shy away from these extensive themes because they turn it on and it scares the hell out of them. They're pretty much over their heads from the gate, even though we all know they're just one touch shells. To be honest, I've been overwhelmed with some of this stuff when I first started.
Most of the people who I've helped that has new computers don't even know what a screen resolution is.
Reply #18 Saturday, May 10, 2008 1:30 PM
And PuterDudeJim?
Of course Jim too..
Reply #19 Saturday, May 10, 2008 3:07 PM
Ok I know what you meant by that was for them to discuss it on the podcast.
But theres an idea for a project for someone.
A media player widget linked to the WinCustomize Skincast so that those of us that don't use Itunes to be able to subscribe to it can just open the widget and see a list of the available episodes there.
Reply #20 Saturday, May 10, 2008 3:43 PM
The way I see it there's two problems with DX themes.
Making an efficient theme is hard work. It has to be pretty much ready to go on startup. That means resolution independence...which as stated before is quite an effort. It means, the shortcuts have to be easy to configure (can't tell you how many times I've seen someone asking how to change the shortcuts/font/labels etc). It means, creating several wallpaper sizes (if your theme is built around a wall). It means, taking the time to anticipate the user's needs, including meters, weather, time, startmenu, systray, taskbar, cursor position, pixel color, media player, shortcuts galore etc, etc. It basically means making the theme as familiar as a regular Windows UI. Eon by Richard Mohler comes the closest to that.
That last point is the basis for my second thought. DX themes are completely unlike WindowsBlinds. WB’s simply change the look of your interface, leaving everything the way you had it before. DX themes change how your interface functions. I've used quite a few DX themes over time and my biggest problem, from a consumer's perspective, is that it was just too foreign. Suddenly, it felt as though I was using someone else's interface. Everything wasn't where I had them before, the start menu didn't have all my usual shortcuts, the taskbar didn't have my quick launch, the floating windows of information (weather, meters, etc) was like having several widgets running at once, many of which I had no use for. I would have like for them to be consolidated into one window or one menu. There wasn’t much flexibility as far as customization or configuring things the way I wanted them, save for setting shortcuts. Simply put, it was too unfamiliar and I would end up using it only for a day or two.
I've uploaded only 2 themes to the gallery. I stopped because, looking back they were totally lacking in functionality. I decided if I ever upload another theme it will have to be vastly improved and more carefully considered. I started a new DX theme last year to try to address and solve the two problems I mentioned. Let's just say it is taking alot more time and effort than anticipated.
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!







Reply #1 Friday, May 9, 2008 7:16 PM
So the good news is that it's not dead.
I like DX desktops too. but so many recent ones look the same. The ones I've used the most are ones for my Kids and ones for guests. Not power user desktops but simplified, controlled desktops.
Having said that . . I'd love to see desktops based on the bullshit I see on TV that makes me cringe. Just so I can show people how crappy it would be to use. (My biggest beef these days . .the UI on any CSI:Miami PC - how can any of that crap be usable?