Poll Results: Cell Phone Themes
That didn't come out how I expected
Monday, March 10, 2008 by Zoomba | Discussion: WinCustomize News
Polls are interesting things. Sometimes you ask what you think is a no-brainer, a question that could only have one reasonable outcome, but then you're surprised when it turns out to be the exact opposite. Last week's poll worked just like that.
Last week I asked if users would like to see WinCustomize add a cell phone theme gallery to the offering. My expectation was that everyone would be up for more customizable content on the site. More skins = more users and that's good right? Evidently I was wrong though as the poll came out 56 to 44% against the new gallery. This is especially surprising considering the conversation on the thread supporting the poll with users generally being positive towards the idea.
Either way, the poll sparked a good debate and was one of our most voted on polls in ages, so it seems the idea at least got people excited enough to vote when they normally wouldn't.
Here's the graph...

For those who voted against, I'd be interested in hearing your reasons why.
Reply #22 Monday, March 10, 2008 3:08 PM
Reply #23 Monday, March 10, 2008 4:30 PM
That is exactly how I voted, I wouldn't use cell phone themes, hence why would I want a gallery library for them. Yea, rather selfish attitude I would now admit. It doesn't take into account the broader picture of keeping customizing current and relevent to new devices coming on the market. Plus if I don't use a particular customizing capability I can just not look at the skins.
Would you look at that, I'm wearing one black and one white sock!!!
Reply #24 Monday, March 10, 2008 4:35 PM
Reply #25 Monday, March 10, 2008 4:47 PM
What?
Reply #26 Monday, March 10, 2008 5:01 PM
I like my new Chocolate and Apparently it is skinable.
Reply #27 Monday, March 10, 2008 5:19 PM
By the way, I don't mean to imply that the vote for "No" was the wrong one, merely that I was surprised and didn't entirely understand it. I was seeking clarification and explanation.
As to polling people on the site for what they'd like added to the site... seems perfectly reasonable to me. People here visit many different websites for different content. I'd like to make WC the place they come for most, if not all of it over time. So I ask the current audience what would be a good value add to the site in terms of galleries. Now though I know that if I add a Cell Phone Themes gallery to the site, it will partially be to service existing members (44%), but largely as an effort to attract a completely new crowd.
Every poll I take regarding site expansion and policy is very helpful in letting me know how such changes will impact both the existing community, and how it will play to draw in new users. The results help advise me on my plans for future additions and changes to the site.
The name of the game is growth. Bigger, better community serving more users, more skins, more skinners, better features. So I try and find the path that gives the community what it wants, and is attractive to new users.
Reply #28 Monday, March 10, 2008 5:34 PM
Reply #29 Monday, March 10, 2008 7:13 PM
Reply #30 Tuesday, March 11, 2008 7:55 AM
Reply #31 Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:01 AM
Like Xion (and soundpackager, and dreams, etc), I'd guess it'll level off.
Reply #32 Tuesday, March 11, 2008 8:03 AM
Reply #33 Tuesday, March 11, 2008 8:07 AM
Like Xion (and soundpackager, and dreams, etc), I'd guess it'll level off.
Reply #34 Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:22 AM
56% vs 44% is not particularly earth-shattering either way. In real terms it can be as insignificant as 14 to 11 people voting.
A discrepancy of 3 isn't going to change the world...![]()
It's one of the issues with statistics [and damn lies]....they have to be quite dramatic to be genuinely relevant....one way or another.
If those 25 [minimum to get those %'s] voted 22 for and 3 against...then you may infer something tangible....![]()
Perhaps what can be read into such an average sort of result is that the wrong group was asked....so there was no strong reaction...either way....and that can simply mean that those most likely to want to skin cell [mobile] phones are NOT the same group of people here already....the ones who DO like to skin their Computer OS...![]()
Reply #35 Tuesday, March 11, 2008 10:21 AM
Then there's the question of....
'the question'.
Polls are famous [especially election time] for being as slanted as the desired outcome.
Questions that are real trouble like...
"Do I look fat in this?"
"Are you still beating your wife?"
....get you no-where [at least not with your manhood still intact].
Like "Cat, or Dog?" .....simple enough...which pet do you prefer?
But "Cutie widdle fluffy kitten, or slavering, rabid, bloodthirsty hound?" ....maybe a wee bit slanted.
The poll here relating to possible popularity for a Phone skinnables gallery on Wincustomize....probably got a bit wobbly due to confusion or lack of clarity about what it might entail.
I wonder what the poll result would look like if it were worded....
"Attraction of new skinners and expansion of public awarness for Wincustomize.com through the addition of cell phone skinning galleries.....Good or Bad?" ...![]()
Reply #36 Wednesday, March 12, 2008 5:28 AM
"Attraction of new skinners and expansion of public awarness for Wincustomize.com through the addition of cell phone skinning galleries.....Good or Bad?" ..
Reply #37 Wednesday, March 12, 2008 12:20 PM
Reply #38 Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:59 PM
First, this is WC, not "Stardock". Second, we feature what is good. If there is an outstanding skin (no matter who it appeals to) then it gets featured. Not all females like "girly" crap, anyway. Most of the stuff that I have seen that is intended to appeal to females makes me shudder. I use my computer all day long, the last thing I want to stare at is frilly, girly or other stuff that most people see as "feminine".
We try to appeal to the general masses. Deciding to feature stuff just because we think it would appeal to a certain group would be wrong. If people want feminine stuff featured, then they have to make high quality feminine skins that can compete with the other submissions. If they are as good as the other things we feature, then they won't be featured.
Reply #39 Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:45 PM
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!







Reply #21 Monday, March 10, 2008 3:04 PM