Sry but i reupload my wall
Saturday, March 8, 2008 by PhoeniXLegenda | Discussion: Wallpapers
It was this wall - https://www.wincustomize.com/skins.aspx?skinid=36054&libid=8
I reupload it again couse i really work hard on it all the night, to show my diligence to another. But after 2 hours as mine wall has appeared on a site it it has appeared on 2 or 3 page. Dont blame me pls 
Here my small gallery: https://www.wincustomize.com/skins.aspx?acid=3032693 
Here my small gallery: https://www.wincustomize.com/skins.aspx?acid=3032693 
 |
|
Page 2 of 2 | |
|
|---|
Jafo
Reply #22 Saturday, March 8, 2008 7:51 PM
Reply #22 Saturday, March 8, 2008 7:51 PM
Never in question. ( Agreed), more of an attempt, at least for my part in this thread, to see if there was a recommended or preferred method of handling the various res sizes and size of downloads.
Probably just the way Quentin did it...
Maybe the only negative to this is if the skinner creates ALL those different resolutions it is ONLY practical to put them in separate uploads, thus looking like it unfairly dominates the new uploads.
Converely, only upping two [big] resolutions...for normal and wide is fine for some, but not everyone is comfortable with a graphics proggy...resizing images to suit their particular [odd] screensize.
Sure, some [like me] don't really car what size/proportion a wall is...if they like it they'll go the extra yards to 'make it fit'...
Bebi Bulma
Reply #23 Saturday, March 8, 2008 8:02 PM
Which is why I think uploading the largest practical size for each ratio would be easier, thus using that size to scale down to whichever resolution a person is running (that's how interfacelift does it).
16:9 (widescreen): 2650x1600 (for use with 1920x1200, 1680x1050, 1440x900, 1280x800, etc)
4:3 (fullscreen): 1600x1200 (for use with 1280x960, 1024x768, etc)
5:4: (fullscreen): 1280x1024 (this one is an odd ratio, doesn't quite scale down from either widescreen or full screen accurately)
So in the end, only 3 files and should cut down the overall package filesize.
Reply #23 Saturday, March 8, 2008 8:02 PM
Converely, only upping two [big] resolutions...for normal and wide is fine for some, but not everyone is comfortable with a graphics proggy...resizing images to suit their particular [odd] screensize.
Which is why I think uploading the largest practical size for each ratio would be easier, thus using that size to scale down to whichever resolution a person is running (that's how interfacelift does it).
16:9 (widescreen): 2650x1600 (for use with 1920x1200, 1680x1050, 1440x900, 1280x800, etc)
4:3 (fullscreen): 1600x1200 (for use with 1280x960, 1024x768, etc)
5:4: (fullscreen): 1280x1024 (this one is an odd ratio, doesn't quite scale down from either widescreen or full screen accurately)
So in the end, only 3 files and should cut down the overall package filesize.
Lantec
Reply #24 Saturday, March 8, 2008 8:16 PM
for single monitor setups......
3 more for dual
3 more for triple
3 more for quad..... )
Reply #24 Saturday, March 8, 2008 8:16 PM
So in the end, only 3 files and should cut down the overall package filesize.
for single monitor setups......
3 more for dual
3 more for triple
3 more for quad..... )
teddybearcholla
Reply #25 Saturday, March 8, 2008 8:46 PM
..... this is also the way I see it. Or if they do not know how, they can ask, or ask for the size emailed, since going to a personal gallery may be too much trouble to pick up that odd size.
....When I create a wallpaper, I do so now at 1920x1200. Many times I go to great lengths to make it fit properly in the fullscreen 1600x1200. I'm not talking about rendering an apophysis, because those can be rendered in any given size. So for the dual, triple and quad...and could be someone will have a row of monitors like Circuit City
...well I just can't see me working on so many versions of the same wallpaper.
Reply #25 Saturday, March 8, 2008 8:46 PM
Sure, some [like me] don't really care what size/proportion a wall is...if they like it they'll go the extra yards to 'make it fit'
..... this is also the way I see it. Or if they do not know how, they can ask, or ask for the size emailed, since going to a personal gallery may be too much trouble to pick up that odd size.
Which is why I think uploading the largest practical size for each ratio would be easier, thus using that size to scale down to whichever resolution a person is running (that's how interfacelift does it).
16:9 (widescreen): 2650x1600 (for use with 1920x1200, 1680x1050, 1440x900, 1280x800, etc)
4:3 (fullscreen): 1600x1200 (for use with 1280x960, 1024x768, etc)
5:4: (fullscreen): 1280x1024 (this one is an odd ratio, doesn't quite scale down from either widescreen or full screen accurately)
So in the end, only 3 files and should cut down the overall package filesize.
16:9 (widescreen): 2650x1600 (for use with 1920x1200, 1680x1050, 1440x900, 1280x800, etc)
4:3 (fullscreen): 1600x1200 (for use with 1280x960, 1024x768, etc)
5:4: (fullscreen): 1280x1024 (this one is an odd ratio, doesn't quite scale down from either widescreen or full screen accurately)
So in the end, only 3 files and should cut down the overall package filesize.
....When I create a wallpaper, I do so now at 1920x1200. Many times I go to great lengths to make it fit properly in the fullscreen 1600x1200. I'm not talking about rendering an apophysis, because those can be rendered in any given size. So for the dual, triple and quad...and could be someone will have a row of monitors like Circuit City
...well I just can't see me working on so many versions of the same wallpaper.
Bebi Bulma
Reply #26 Saturday, March 8, 2008 10:03 PM
Well...in that case, break them up into 2 packs: Single Screen, Multiple Screen.
Reply #26 Saturday, March 8, 2008 10:03 PM
So in the end, only 3 files and should cut down the overall package filesize.for single monitor setups...... 3 more for dual3 more for triple3 more for quad..... )
Well...in that case, break them up into 2 packs: Single Screen, Multiple Screen.
ArileenDesign
Reply #27 Sunday, March 9, 2008 9:53 AM
Reply #27 Sunday, March 9, 2008 9:53 AM
(Triplescreen)
_5760x1200
_4800x1200
_3840x1024
(Dualscreen)
_2560x1024
_3200x1200
_5120x1600
(Widescreen)
_2560x1600
(Fullscreen)
_1280x1024
_1600x1200
that's only the high one for each ratios. = 9 walls total 6Mo in the best case.
I think pack them in single and multiple screen would be ok for some. But honestly as i said before i prefer see what i'll dld before and a triple or dual or widescreen is really not done the same way in general than a fullscreen and differe from the artistes.
And that way you'll get a single screen pack at around 1 Mo and the second at 5Mo (or higher if you take the time to make the Quadscreen)
_5760x1200
_4800x1200
_3840x1024
(Dualscreen)
_2560x1024
_3200x1200
_5120x1600
(Widescreen)
_2560x1600
(Fullscreen)
_1280x1024
_1600x1200
that's only the high one for each ratios. = 9 walls total 6Mo in the best case.
I think pack them in single and multiple screen would be ok for some. But honestly as i said before i prefer see what i'll dld before and a triple or dual or widescreen is really not done the same way in general than a fullscreen and differe from the artistes.
And that way you'll get a single screen pack at around 1 Mo and the second at 5Mo (or higher if you take the time to make the Quadscreen)
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
|
|
Page 2 of 2 | |
|
|---|
Reply #21 Saturday, March 8, 2008 7:30 PM
Well if I was wrong that have loaded my wall again. In the future it will be normal if I shall load all these: Fullscreen, Widescreen, Dualscreen, Triplescreen? And if others begin to do too I most that suspect to the main page will be a current of work of 2 people...
(nothing against you Quentin94)