Windows Home Server Specs, Price and Date Leaked
First person to go "But I can do this free with Linux" gets smacked
Thursday, August 23, 2007 by Zoomba | Discussion: WinCustomize News
WHS, possibly the only Windows release in recent memory to have *positive* buzz surrounding it has had a bit of a breach in secrecy. Today Ars Technica is reporting that details surrounding the soon-to-be-released OS were leaked to the 'net. Namely, specs and prices on the HP MediaSmart Home Server.
Set for release on September 15th, the HP MediaSmart Home Server will come in two flavors; a 500GB unit for $596 and a 1TB unit for $745. Both systems will have the 64-bit 1.8GHz AMD Semperon Processor and four slide-out drive bays for SATA drive expansion.
Not a bad price really for what you're getting, and considering how well-received WHS has been by the press and tech community, this may mark a major shift of PCs becoming home appliances that even the regular end-user can handle.
Reply #2 Thursday, August 23, 2007 11:53 AM
But I get really get confused when looking at anything other than my desktop computer.
Who or what type of people will find this interesting. The single computer home user (like me), someone who has a home network setup or are we only talking business people or corporations here? What situations would make this worthwhile to purchase?
The OS shown looks more like XP than Vista, is that correct?
EDIT: Of course I was slow typing. Thanks for the links Zubaz.
Reply #3 Thursday, August 23, 2007 12:02 PM
It discovers all networked PCs, backs up all of them (a la system restore), allows for restore of individual files, shares all media (unless flagged not to share by admin), allows remote access to the server from the internet, streams media to Xboxes.
The server itself doesn't need a keyboard or mouse. After install all management is done from console on the local PCs. So you can turn it on and stick the server in the closet. Then you install the console on your other PCs and go through the wizard to identify what feature you *don''t* want it to implement.
Reply #4 Thursday, August 23, 2007 12:05 PM
WHS is based on Windows 2003 Server, so yeah it has more in common with XP than Vista.
While this isn't 100% fire-and-forget for users, it's pretty darn simple. If the product takes off, I wouldn't be surprised if in the future there was a 1-step config for a WHS box. Plug the box into the network, turn it on, run an installer on your PC and *boom* it's all auto-detected and setup. No harder than installing a printer probably.
Personally, while the price on the HP is very attractive, I'd probably prefer to just buy a stand-alone copy of WHS and another hard drive and slap it into a spare PC. But for those who don't want to bother with that hassle, the HP prices are impressive.
Reply #5 Thursday, August 23, 2007 12:19 PM
Thanks very much.
(I'm going to go stand in the corner now, I was a bad boy. We have 3 desktops and one laptop and no network running).
Reply #6 Friday, August 24, 2007 12:06 AM
Wow. C'mon Philly - time to move out of the dark ages! What's the point of having multiple computers in your house if they can't communicate?
Reply #7 Friday, August 24, 2007 2:56 AM
As was I [A participant in the beta] ... and I completely agree with Zubaz.
I know I'll be using it at home for all my backup/sharing/remote access needs.
Microsoft is on the ball with this one ....and their prices are very reasonable.
Reply #8 Friday, August 24, 2007 7:01 AM
But I would think this could be interesting if it breaks the arbitrary 10 connections shares limit of XP. If it doesn't, there's nothing here of interest to me.
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
Reply #1 Thursday, August 23, 2007 11:52 AM
I was part of the beta for WHS and I had no complaints at all. Easy to set up and use.
I plan on pushing this to everyone I know. No one I know (outside of communities like this) back up data in any kind of organized way. The media and other file sharing, and remote access may be the door that opens the door to responsible back-ups.