What Skins are the Perfect Skins?
and who made them?
Wednesday, May 10, 2006 by Chasbo | Discussion: WindowBlinds
1. Night Train - Nemo - as far as I can see, this skin is perfect and it BLOWS MY MIND.
2. Tiggz - GT3 - Could be the best skin ever made.
3. MikeB314 - StealthOS - There isn't anything about this skin that isn't great!
4. adni18 - (Your pick goes here) - Perhaps the greatest skinner. His body of work is uncomparable!
5. Treetog - Artwork - What else can I say but: PERFECTION.
Reply #2 Thursday, May 11, 2006 9:12 AM
Note - for any tech support readers, the issue above is not that the control button lights up in the example above, it is that it stay lit on mouse-away state. Therefore, the reset procedure.
Found using Vista v2 by Kol, which is not currently available due to MS restrictions.
Reply #3 Thursday, May 11, 2006 10:11 AM
1 Stealthos by Mike
2 DogmaX4 by Brewman
3 Vista by Kol

Reply #4 Thursday, May 11, 2006 10:12 AM
i would also add danilloOc WB skins as examples of perfection...all very functional and very beautifully themed...
-scion- skins are fantastic too, with his Aten skin being one of my all time favourites

Reply #5 Thursday, May 11, 2006 3:13 PM
Some of the more recent ones I'd consider perfect are
DogmaX4 by Brewman
Tronnix by Mike Bryant
5imple Alpha by DanilloOc
Thallos & Kuantam by Kol
Artwork by Treetog
Mirage, Fogger, Nemo & Badlands by Night Train
Candy Coated & GUI Magic by GUI Magic (whoever that is...
)I hate to have to single any out (or forget to include)but I think all the above pass the test.
Reply #6 Thursday, May 11, 2006 3:42 PM
Candy Coated & GUI Magic by GUI Magic (whoever that is...)
That would be me, Sir Lantec. It's the name of my website.
That's just sad.
Reply #7 Thursday, May 11, 2006 8:00 PM
| That would be me, Sir Lantec. It's the name of my website. That's just sad. |
I knew that. I was pokin fun because it IS the name of a website instead of the skinner. No harm intended. I'm a big fan of your work. I think Virtuality & Greeneyes would qualify also although they're not WB5 skins. They've both managed to stay on my machine for more than 3 years. Love to see both "updated"

Reply #8 Thursday, May 11, 2006 8:28 PM
stealthOS gets second place.
the rest i cant really use for long

Reply #9 Thursday, May 11, 2006 8:47 PM
Aura - Mike B (if it were darker, less white, and a diff start button, I'd use it more).
VistaXP - KoL_ (I just love this skin
! Even excluding the program wont let it run.)Most Funcational
StealthOS - Mike B (amazing... just amazing)
Artwork - Treetog (looks great once I made it not look blue lol. Really awesome skin)
Reply #10 Friday, May 12, 2006 5:41 PM
Blue Swirl is my personal favorite.

Reply #11 Sunday, May 21, 2006 1:36 AM
Reply #12 Sunday, May 21, 2006 2:19 AM
Too bad i can't see the full potential on trial.

Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!







Reply #1 Thursday, May 11, 2006 9:08 AM
StealthOS is the closest to a fully compatible skin that I have used.
The fact that WB has changed over the past two years (sometimes in big ways, and sometimes in small ways) does not seem to affect this skin from performing on a consistent basis.
Due to my now using the Adobe CS2 series of programs, I have seen some small issues with the WB5 program and these programs, but it appears to be linked to either the handling of the shell frame components and/or the use of video resources to accomplish performance. For instance, when multiple files are open and I mouse over the control buttons of a file behind the foremost file, the control button becomes active, yet the window does not move forward. The workaround I found for this was to click the file titlebar to bring it to the front and make it active, then click the file that was in front to reset. A bit of extra work, but not enough to condemn anything.
There are other small issues like this one, which I will assume that Stardock will correct in the upcoming builds.
This makes it a bit more difficult to assess the performance of the skin(s) vs. the performance of the WB5 program - IMO.
All in all, for anyone wanting to have control of the GUI shell look and feel, WB5 is still the best bet, and StealthOS is still the standard that I measure all skins by.
No highjacking intended, just some additional comment content.