DesktopX Review
Friday, November 18, 2005 by tjesterb | Discussion: Internet
Adam Baratz, of Ars Technica has posted a review of DesktopX 3.1. http://arstechnica.com/reviews/apps/desktopx.ars
While it's perhaps not the most flattering review, it does mention the great potential of DesktopX.
Some of the issues he noted were some of the same things that have kept me from utilizing DX to a greater degree.
Brad has stated that DX, while having much more power and configurability, has been Konfabulator's "Whipping boy" Maybe these are some of the reasons why.
While it's perhaps not the most flattering review, it does mention the great potential of DesktopX.
Some of the issues he noted were some of the same things that have kept me from utilizing DX to a greater degree.
Brad has stated that DX, while having much more power and configurability, has been Konfabulator's "Whipping boy" Maybe these are some of the reasons why.
Frogboy
Reply #2 Sunday, November 20, 2005 7:27 PM
Reply #2 Sunday, November 20, 2005 7:27 PM
A DesktopX widget uses around 2 or 3 megs of memory. Far less than a stand alone program typically does.
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
Reply #1 Friday, November 18, 2005 1:33 PM
It's things like this that seem unfair - nothing in the review to substantiate this or give comparisons to other similar programs, just the statement, and people read it and take it as fact.